Dependency Deduction - Judgment Search Results

Umadevi and ors. Vs. Chandrashekharaiah and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2012(1)KCCR138

..... was 14 and that the deductions that is required to be calculated in cases where there are four dependents deduction should be th and ..... 3000 which is proper but while considering loss of dependency the tribunal has wrongly deducted 1 3rd from his income towards his personal ..... his avocation and income and further while calculating loss of dependency the tribunal has taken only 1 3rd of the notional .....

Umadevi and Others Vs. Chandrashekharaiah and Others

Court: Karnataka

..... 14 8217 and that the deductions that is required to be calculated in cases where there are four dependents deduction should be th and ..... 3000 which is proper but while considering loss of dependency the tribunal has wrongly deducted 1 3rd from his income towards his personal ..... his avocation and income and further while calculating loss of dependency the tribunal has taken only 1 3rd of the notional .....

Lalitesh Chauhan and ors. Vs. Harvinder Singh and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... the net income of the deceased available for the support of himself and his dependants and to deduct therefrom such part of his income as the deceased was accustomed to spend upon ..... of the deceased for the purpose of assessment of the loss of dependency of his legal representatives should have deducted the sum of 2 100 therefrom which as reflected in ex pw2 .....

Chandrashekar (D) by Lrs. and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2012(1)KLT6(SN); 2012(1)SCC390; AIR2012SCW73; 2012(2)SCJ55; AIR2012SC446

..... value for housing or commercial purposes normally 1 3rd amount of compensation should be deducted depending upon the location extent of expenditure involved for development the area required for roads ..... apart for developmental activities it was also sought to be clarified that the applied deduction would depend on whether the acquired land was rural or urban whether building activity was picking .....

Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization Vs. Winn

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 3 ca3 holding that plaintiffs as taxpayers have standing under flast to challenge a tax deduction for dependents attending religious and other private schools grit v wolman 413 u s 901 1973 ..... in that instance the taxpayer s direct and particular connection with the establishment does not depend on economic speculation or political conjecture the connection would exist even if the conscientious .....

Sumathikutty Vs. N. Manoj and Others

Court: Kerala

..... the net income of the deceased available for the support of himself and his dependants and to deduct therefrom such part of his income as the deceased was accustomed to spend upon ..... by the tribunal to arrive at the loss of dependency are i additions deductions to be made for arriving at the income ii the deduction to be made towards the personal living expenses .....

P.S. Somanathan and ors. Vs. District Insurance Officer and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... the net income of the deceased available for the support of himself and his dependants and to deduct therefrom such part of his income as the deceased was accustomed to spend upon ..... by the tribunal to arrive at the loss of dependency are i additions deductions to be made for arriving at the income ii the deduction to be made towards the personal living expenses .....

Bali Singh and ors. Vs. Ram Kumar Paswan and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... corporation and anr 2009 6 scc 121 where the deceased is survived by seven dependant family members deduction of only one fifth of the income of the deceased towards his personal and ..... 3 100 divide 2 for the purpose of computation of loss of dependency 8 adverting next to the aspect of deduction for personal and living expenses i accept the contention of the .....

U.P. State Road Tansport Corpn. Vs. Jyotsana Yadav and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... towards his personal expenses keeping in view the fact that the deceased had four dependant family members deducting one fourth of the income of the deceased towards his personal expenses the loss ..... contended that for the purpose of calculating the monthly dependency of the respondents no 1 to 4 the learned tribunal ought to have deducted not more than one fourth of the income .....

D.T.C. Vs. Lata Mansukhani and ors

Court: Delhi

..... behind him his wife and three daughters that is four dependents a deduction of one fourth only is required to be made from ..... iii the learned tribunal ought to have capitalized the loss of dependency suffered by the claimants by the multiplier of 15 keeping in ..... his income towards his personal expenses thus the average monthly loss of dependency .....