Denigrating - Judgment Search Results

The Karnataka State Accounts Department Employees' Association, Bangal ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR3035; 2000(4)KarLJ452

order1 since the questions raised in these petitions are same and identical all these petitions are taken up for hearing...

V.V. Narayana Murthy Vs. Chairman-cum-managing Director, New India Ass ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(5)ALD704; 2000(5)ALT690

order1 the petitioner who was working as divisional manager under the administrative control of the 3rd respondent regional manager who...

Suresh Singh Vs. Director, North Central Zone Cultural Centre, Allahab ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2000(2)AWC1079; [2000(84)FLR713]; (2000)IILLJ1315All; (2000)1UPLBEC626

m katju j 1 this writ petition has been filed against the impugned orders dated 13 1 1998 annexures 25...

R. Sivakumar, Ias Vs. Union Public Service Commission

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

1 the applicant in oa nos 238 and 781 of 1998 is the same person and has assailed the impugned...

Subhash Chand Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Jaipur

Reported in: (2003)(2)SLJ330CAT

1 in this application filed under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act the applicant seeks following reliefs i downgradation...

J. Alexander Vs. Central Bureau of Investigatin, Bangalore

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR1418; 2000(3)KarLJ628

..... held the comparative advertisement is permissible so long as such comparison does not disparage or denigrate a trade mark or the products of a competitor the comparison of different features of ..... enjoy over the other is also permissible provided such comparison stops short of discrediting or denigrating the other product though the defendant has every right to market its product by claiming .....

Kannambadi Sreenivasa Iyengar's Sri Harihareswara Devasthana Trust and ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2000Kant356; ILR2000KAR3201; 2001(4)KarLJ264

..... held the comparative advertisement is permissible so long as such comparison does not disparage or denigrate a trade mark or the products of a competitor the comparison of different features of ..... enjoy over the other is also permissible provided such comparison stops short of discrediting or denigrating the other product though the defendant has every right to market its product by claiming .....

Delhi Pollution Control Committee Vs. National Chemical and PharmA. En ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001(4)SCALE231

..... delineating the spheres of powers between the three organs of the state would tend to denigrate the constitutional objectives and destroy the balance and disturb the harmony of power per k .....

Bimalendu De and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2001Cal30

..... deprave corrupt or injure the public morality or morals l denigrates children m contains visuals or words which reflect a slandering ..... of the country or encourages superstition or blind belief or denigrates women through the depiction in any manner of the figure ..... deprave corrupt or injure the public morality or morals or denigrates children or contains visuals or words which reflect a slandering .....

Nixon Vs. Shrink Missouri Government Pac

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the messages that the contributor wishes to convey absent the ability to rest on the denigration of contributions as mere proxy speech the arguments fall apart 3 the decision of individuals ..... n c inc 487 u s 781 790 791 1988 b the court in buckley denigrated the speech interests not only of contributors but also of candidates although the court purported .....