Demonstrative - Judgment Search Results

Chakareshwar Nath JaIn Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC2009; 1981CriLJ1690; 1981(Supp)SCC11

..... lulla that the respondent decided to abandon the appellant the letters demonstrated beyond any reasonable doubt that the wife did not demonstrated beyond band with the requisite animus but on the other .....

K. Jagannadha Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1519; 1981LabIC1096; (1981)IILLJ252SC; 1981(3)SCALE1079; (1981)3SCC604; [1982]1SCR69; 1981(2)SLJ234(SC); 1981(13)LC601(SC)

..... in s g jai singhani s case rests is knocked down because it can be demonstrably established that neither rule 4 nor the quota prescribed thereunder was statuary in character but .....

State of Assam and anr. Vs. Jitendra Kumar Senapati and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC969; 1981(1)SCALE328; (1981)2SCC221; [1981]2SCR850; 1981(13)LC189(SC)

..... for the purpose of providing maintaining or continuing any amenity at chandigarh this provision clearly demonstrates that the providing amenities is not linked to auction of plots on lease basis and .....

Hindustan Aluminium Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and an ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1649; 1983(13)ELT1656(SC); 1981(3)SCALE1130; (1981)3SCC578; [1982]1SCR129; [1981]48STC411(SC); 1981(13)LC605(SC)

..... this is more so when uniform taxes are levied the state cannot be asked to demonstrate equality simply stated the law is this difference in treatment must be capable of being .....

Shaik HussaIn and Sons Vs. M.G. Kannaiah and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1725; (1981)3SCC71; 1981(13)LC281a(SC)

..... of circumstances relevant to the inference as the sine qua non for action must be demonstrable if their existence is questioned it has to be proved at least prima facie it .....

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... incorporating the principles laid down in the recent english or american cases this intrinsic circumstance demonstrably proves that the view taken by the supreme court over the years is correct and ..... has its institutions and values rooted in the rule of law and that is plainly demonstrated by the provisions of our constitutional structure and the constitutional philosophy inspiring it the vitality .....

Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to states and public and private nonprofit agencies to establish model programs to demonstrate innovative habilitation techniques and to train professional and paraprofessional personnel with respect ..... make grants to university affiliated facilities to assist them in administering and operating demonstration facilities for the provision of services to persons with developmental disabilities and .....

Kassel Vs. Consolidated Freightways Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... value assertions of legislative purposes when an examination of the legislative scheme and its history demonstrates that the asserted purpose could not have been a goal of the legislation citing cases ..... value assertions of legislative purposes when an examination of the legislative scheme and its history demonstrates that the asserted purpose could not have been a goal of the legislation weinberger v .....

American Textile Mfrs. Inst., Inc. Vs. Donovan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... analysis before promulgating a toxic material or harmful physical agent standard the legislative history demonstrates conclusively that congress was fully aware that the act would impose real and substantial ..... 5 also provides development of standards under this subsection shall be based upon research demonstrations experiments and such other information as may be appropriate in addition to the .....

City of Memphis Vs. Greene

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the street closing violate the thirteenth amendment a review of the justification for the closing demonstrates that its disparate impact on black citizens could not be fairly characterized as a badge ..... racially discriminatory motive on the part of the city council footnote 41 instead the record demonstrates that the interests that did motivate the council are legitimate proper management of the flow .....