Demand - Year 2002 - Judgments

Jul 16 2002 (TRI)

ion Exchange (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-16-2002

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT499Tri(Chennai)

..... comprising of five parts eliciting the errors contradictions non examination evidences and contentions confirming demand in violation of natural justice based on documents copies of which were not ..... assistant commissioner and later commissioner appeals allowed their refund claim including setting aside the demands raised for the period on this very item thereafter the department approved the revised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 2002 (TRI)

Lady Amphthil Nurses Instns and Vs. Cc, Chennai and Cc, Cochin

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-22-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC630

..... for determination before us are whether customs authorities have jurisdiction to initiate proceedings of demanding duty and confiscation the goods for violation of the conditions of the exemption notification ..... following the procedure prescribed in the instant case the customs have initiated proceedings of demanding customs duty after following the procedure prescribed in law 50 further the hon ble .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 2002 (TRI)

Wipro Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Jul-24-2002

Reported in: (2003)86ITD407(Bang.)

..... of stay when the petition is by way of a common application for stay of demand pertaining to three different assessment years the learned departmental representative shri amitabh kumar submitted that ..... tribunal rules 1963 suggests that separate application shall be filed for stay of recovery of demand under different enactments this does not suggest that a common application for various years can .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2002 (HC)

Hari Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: May-31-2002

Reported in: I(2003)DMC654

..... beyond reasonable doubt that accused hari singh had been demanding dowry and since the demand was not fulfilled accused hari singh had harassed ..... had harassed or maltreated smt nirmala deceased on account of any demand for dowry soon before her death smt nirmala deceased was ..... since smt nirmala and her family members failed to fulfil this demand accused hari singh had harassed her to the extent that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2002 (HC)

Ram Prasad and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-31-2002

Reported in: II(2003)DMC154; RLW2003(1)Raj681; 2002(4)WLC774

..... been subjected to cruelty and harassment in connection with any demand for dowry when the above ingredients are fulfilled the husband ..... after santo reached her inlaws house the accused started raising demand for dowry and harassing her she further stated that santo ..... was being harassed or was subjected to cruelty on account of demand of dowry except general vague and inconsistant statements of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 2002 (HC)

Indian Commerce and Industries Co. Pvt. Limited Vs. the Commercial Tax ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-25-2002

Reported in: [2003]129STC509(Mad)

..... the basis of returns or no returns for any additional demand raised demand notice inform b3 is served on the assessee giving ..... accordance with provisions of the act without any notice of demand to the assessee while charging sections create tax liability the ..... of the act in other cases best judgment provisional assessment demand created will stand notwithstanding filing of the prescribed return after .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 2002 (TRI)

Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhawan Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-29-2002

Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC592

..... in all these connected appeals are whether the extended period for demanding duty under the proviso to section 11a 1 of the central ..... contended that in view of the board s circular even the demand for the 6 months period cannot be sustained against them 7 ..... period involved in all these appeals the revenue is justified in demanding the central excise duty for the normal period of limitation however .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2002 (HC)

Needhimanickam Vs. State by Dsp, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Madras

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-21-2002

Reported in: [2003]47SCL772(Mad)

..... 2 500 when they pleaded their inability to the accused he demanded rs 500 initially and after allotment order remaining amount can ..... explanation forthcoming from the accused whatsoever except a complete denial of demand or receipt of bribe if the accused would have taken a ..... to prove beyond the fact that prosecution witness had paid the demanded money to the appellant public servant in view of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2002 (HC)

Catholic Centre Vs. Pilot Pen Co. (India) (P) Ltd. (In Liquidation) an ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-04-2002

Reported in: [2003]259ITR252(Mad)

..... it is fairly stated that in this application he is questioning the demand for payment of interest penal interest towards income tax it is ..... of the revenue after income tax has been determined and its payment demanded from the liquidator they further held that it would be open ..... remit the admitted liability of rs 6 94 122 excluding the demand for interest and penal interest it is made clear that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 04 2002 (HC)

Catholic Centre Vs. Pilot Pen Co. (India) Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-04-2002

Reported in: [2002]112CompCas552(Mad); (2004)4CompLJ565(Mad)

..... is fairly stated that in this application he is questioning the demand for payment of interest penal interest towards income tax it is ..... the revenue after income tax has been determined and its payment demanded from the liquidator they further held that it would be open ..... it is made clear that the present order is confined to demand for interest and penal interest in respect of income tax liability .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Demand - Judgment Search Results