Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2006(4)ALD666; 2006(3)ALT620
..... to prove the case. order vi rule 17 of the c.p.c. was re-introduced by the amending act (act 22 of 2002) by virtue of section 7 of the said act and the repeal and savings are dealt with by section 16 of the aforesaid act. in view of the fact that the suit was instituted prior to the coming into force of ..... ground that it was moved at a belated stage, and the same cannot be sustained. the learned counsel also placed strong reliance on m.p. rajasekharan nair v. raju 2003 (tls) 1103919 2003-tiker-0-59.3. heard the counsel.4. the unsuccessful petitioners-defendants in i.a. no. 453/2005 in o.s. no. 70/2001 on the file of junior ..... civil judge, jangaon, had preferred the c.r.p. under article 227 of the constitution of india being aggrieved by the dismissal of the application praying for the relief of amending the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : [1995]97STC316(AP)
..... c) of the additional duties of excise act was omitted by the additional duties of excise (goods of special importance) amendment act, 1985 (act no. 7 of 1986) with effect from february 28, 1986. section 4 of the said amendment act enacts that in the principal act for the first schedule, the schedule appended to the act 7 of 1986 shall be substituted. from ..... the above narration, it is clear that in the relevant assessment year 1987-88, item 19 of the first schedule of the central excises and salt act was not on the statute ..... allowed the appeals by a common order dated june 12, 1989. hence, these two revisions are preferred by the state. 5. the state of andhra pradesh amended the first schedule of the apgst act and inserted entry no. 174 initially by g.o.ms. no. 375, dated april 25, 1987, with effect from may 1, 1987, subsequently by .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1993(2)ALT1
..... . 3, 92,100/- to the claimant, calculated at the rate of rs. 20/- per square yard and also granted 12% additional market value and 30% solatium as per the amended act of 1984. he deducted 40% towards lay-out losses. the table of calculation made by the land acquisition officer, huda, so far as the claim of the present claimant is ..... date of award i.e., 14-7-1988. he is also entitled to interest as per the provisions of the amended act as the award passed by the land acquisition officer in this case is subsequent to the coming into force of the amended act.41. in the result, a.s. no. 2087 of 1991, the appeal preferred by huda, is allowed in ..... view of the growing trend of inflation and the persons possessing black money, there is every possibility of registering the documents for lesser amounts and that the amended section 269 of the income-tax act itself is a recognition that a lot of unaccounted money goes into transaction of real estate. this is what the delhi high court in tanvi trading & .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 1996(3)ALT306
..... published simultaneously at the site, would render the notification and the proceedings invalid. after the decision of the full bench, the land acquisition act, 1894 was amended by the andhra pradesh amendment act 9 of 1983, stipulating that the publication of the substance of the notification is to to be made at the site within forty days ..... invalid. it is after this decision that the cause of action for the present cases arose.9. section 4(1) of the land acquisition act was further amended by the central amendment act 68 of 1984 by virtually recasting the section, to read as follows:'whenever it appears to the appropriate government that land in any locality is ..... b.). was a case in which the question before the court was, whether publication of notification at the site within 40 days was still necessary evenafter the central amendment act 68 of 1984. the court held in the negative clarifying that no such publication was any longer necessary and any notice, if had not been so published .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2001(4)ALD747; 2001(4)ALT725
..... the licence. the petitioner accordingly entered into an agreement. subsequently, the petitioner applied to the authority under the a.p. cinema (regulation) act for amending the licence. the licence was accordingly amended and the searing capacity was mentioned as 793 by an order dated 29-10-1976. the petitioner then filed a revision before the deputy ..... judgment was rendered by this court while interpreting the rule, as it stood during the relevant point of time and it was specifically pointed out that the amended rules, after 21st november, 1984 were in contrast to the earlier provisions. therefore, the judgment of this courtreferred to above is not of any assistance to ..... 11-1988 and in fact the amended rule with effect from 28-11-1988 provides that if the revised or modified gross collection capacity results in decrease over the existing gross collection capacity, the proprietor shall continue to pay the amount of tax payable under section 5 of the act, before such revision or modification .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : (2008)12VST112(AP)
..... to be taxed at four per cent with effect from may 1, 2006.12 the apvat act, 2005 was amended by the a. p. vat (second amendment) act, 2006 (act no. 34 of 2006) and the amendment, in g.o. ms. no. 502 dated may 1, 2006, was inserted into the act as entry 100 of schedule iv. in addition entries 102 to 113 were also added ..... . no. 1615 dated august 31, 2005, ostensibly issued in exercise of the power conferred by section 76(2), is referable to section 79(1) of the act, rightly so, since exercise of the power to amend the schedule under section 79(1) is hedged by the restrictions stipulated in sub-section (2) thereof. the very fact that the notification, in g.o ..... . 1615 dated august 31, 2005, is in exercise of the power conferred under section 76(2) of the act to remove difficulties and cannot run contrary to the provisions of the act. since entry 16 of schedule iv of the act, prior to its amendment by act 34 of 2006, did not classify bulk drugs on the basis of its coverage by hsn codes, no .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2004(1)ALD287
..... land acquisition submits that the petitioners are at liberty to claim benefits in accordance with the provisions of the amended act, but they are not entitled to claim initiation of fresh land acquisition proceedings.6. on 8-9-2003, upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned government pleader for land acquisition for some time ..... and the learned government pleader for land acquisition.3. the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners would contend that having regard to the provisions of the amended act, particularly section 11-a thereof, which came into effect from 24-9-1984, the land acquisition proceedings are required to be completed within two years from the ..... 9-2003 i.e., nearly after lapse of twenty four years from the date of publication of declaration under section 6 of the act on 14-6-1979. in that view of the matter, the land acquisition proceedings must be held to have lapsed.11. be that as it may, it may be noted that the amendment act came .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(2)ALD737; 2005(3)ALT330
..... the market value of the land from rs. 3,765-00 to rs. 8,000-00 per acre and also directed to pay all statutory benefits as per the amended act. further the government pleader for appeals opined that there are no grounds to carry the matter to supreme court by way of slp then the special deputy collector prepared a ..... directed by the government in the above go. it is submitted that on the letter from engineer-in-chief, the superintending engineer, hlc anantapur through letter dated 31-3-2003 authorised the pay and accounts officer, l.a. hlc stage-ii to make payment of decretal charges to the respondent on submission of bill. the pay and accounts officer ..... 4,96,322-00. a similar phenomenon is found in various other calculation memos.4. secondly, the senior civil judge observed that in the calculation memo dated 13-10-2003 the claimant has referred to total market value i.e., the amount awarded by the land acquisition officer and also the amount enhanced by the high court and thereafter claimed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2007(5)ALD171; 2007(4)ALT72
..... council (3 supra), this court observed as under: (scc p.758, para 33).in the absence of any challenge having been laid, the constitutional validity of the amendment cannot be gone into.recently, in president, poornathrayisha seva sangham v. k. thilakan kavenal (4 supra), in para 9, it was observed as under: (scc pp ..... injustice. achutananda baidya v. prafulla kumar gayan : [1997]3scr709 ; state of a.p. v. hanumantha rao : (2003)10scc121 . in the present case the tribunal has acted contrary to the provisions of the administrative tribunals act and the rules made thereunder in allowing the o.as. at the admission stage without notice to the respondents and without ..... representation filed by the respondent-applicants taking into consideration the judgment of the high court in w.p. no. 17497 of 1999 and batch dated 21-11 -2003, the writ petition filed there against was not maintainable.8. sri p. balakrishnamurthy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of some of the petitioners, would submit that, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(3)ALD422; 2005(4)ALT59
..... published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1894, shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of publication of the notification.provided further that no such declaration shall be ..... 43 and 45, ward 51, block f of nampally village. the land acquisition proceedings are in accordance with the act and the amendment act of 1984 and there is no violation of sections 4, 5 and 11 of the act as alleged by the writ petitioner. it was further stated that at the first instance the draft notification under section ..... covered by a notification under section 4, sub-section (1):--(i) published after the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment and validation) ordinance, 1957 (1 of 1957), but before the commencement of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1894, shall be made after the expiry of one year from the date of the publication of the notification.(ii) .....
Tag this Judgment!