Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi water board act 1988 Page 1 of about 348,435 results (0.372 seconds)

Delhi Jal Board Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : IV(2005)ACC746; 2006ACJ1025; AIR2006Delhi75; 125(2005)DLT120; (2006)142PLR33

..... section 14 of the delhi water board act, 1998 mention that the laying and maintenance of the sewer system is the function of jal board.9. ..... impliedly casts on those thus empowered 'the duty of filling up the ground again and of restoring the street to its original condition' similarly in forbes v lee cons board (1879) 4 ex 116 it was observed that a public authority authorised to make a bridge and take tolls is impliedly bound to keep it in proper repair ( see also'n.s.bindra's interpretation of ..... the railways act, 1890 (corresponding to section 124 of the 1989 act), section 140 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, etc ..... the bhopal gas tragedy, the chernobyl nuclear disaster, the crude oil spill in 1988 on to the alaska coast line from the oil tanker exxon valdez, and other similar incidents have shocked the conscience of people all over the world and have aroused thinkers ..... responsible for maintenance of sewer and and water system in delhi and is not responsible for maintenance of ..... its own rules as was thought at the beginning of this century and that the general principle behind the tort of negligence is that 'you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour', vide donoghue v. ..... it is stated in paragraph 9 of the counter affidavit of delhi jal board that:'admittedly, the manhole of the sewer line was covered properly, but the upper surface level of the manhole cover was not in tandem with the road surface .....

Maharaja Alak Narayana Science and Arts Society (Mansas) Vs. Buddaraju ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(1)ALD474; 2005(2)ALT106

..... for and examine the records relating to any proceedings taken by the tahsildar, the revenue court or the collector under this act for the purpose of satisfying itself as to the regularity of such proceeding or the correctness, legality or propriety of any decision made or order passed therein; and if, in any case, it appears to the board of revenue that any such decision or order should be modified, annulled, reversed or remitted for re-consideration, it may ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent contained in any other law for the time being in force or any statute having effect, the provisions of the inams abolition act would apply, and that civil court decree is 'instrument' within the meaning of section 15 and therefore the same does not bar the petitioner from filing ..... in such an event, first respondent cannot be expected to file an appeal before the revenue divisional officer within sixty days as per section 3(4) of the act, further, at the initial stages of issuing notices in form-v, vi and vii, sdt, prima facie determined that the petitioner would be entitled only to l/3rd share in the land ..... when the petitioner was constituting trust deed dated 12.11.1958, it could not have claimed benefit under section 4(1) of the act.therefore, prima facie, commissioner was correct in coming to the conclusion that sdt issued ryotwari patta in favour of petitioner without any representation or without verifying the title ..... [1988]1scr180 and gujarat water supply and sewerage board ..... delhi .....

E.S.i.C. Vs. C.C. Santhakumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(112)FLR636]; [2007(2)JCR132(SC)]; JT2006(10)SC549; 2007(1)KLT133(SC); (2007)IILLJ3SC; (2007)147PLR191; 2006(12)SCALE171; (2007)1SCC584

..... the determination of the claim or question before the employees' insurance court, that court shall direct the corporation to have the question decided by this act and shall thereafter proceed with the determination of the claim or question before it in accordance with the decision of the medical board or the medical appeal tribunal, as the case may be, except where an appeal has been filed before the employees' insurance court under sub- ..... is not restricted by any limitation nor could the government by recourse to the rule-making power prescribe a period in the teeth of section 68.in the above judgment this court has clearly held that section 68 of the act empowers the corporation to resort to coercive process, to recover the contribution from the employer as if it were an arrear of land revenue and the said right is not restricted by any limitation. ..... or between a principal employer and an immediate employer or between a person and the corporation or between an employee and a principal or immediate employer, in respect of any contribution or benefit or other dues payable or recoverable under this act, or any other matter required to be or which may be decided by the employees' insurance court under this act], such question or dispute '[subject to the provisions of sub-section (2a) shall be decided by the employees' insurance court in accordance with the provisions of this ..... nath ashok kumar : [1988]1scr180 and gujarat water supply & sewerage board v. ..... municipal corporation of delhi v. .....

Ajit Ravi vs.delhi Jal Board & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... delhi jal board shall ensure that all requisite permissions are obtained at the earliest and the work of replacement of the water pipes is carried out at the earliest so that the area does not receive contaminated water ..... sections 143, 160, 341, 409, 506, 426 and 120b ipc and the relevant sections of prevention of corruption act, 1988 to submit the report accordingly. 3. ..... this writ petition has been filed complaining that the delhi jal board has illegally issued work order no.161 to m/s shiv singh construction company on 31st march, 2017 to carry out repair work in gali no.3, north chajjupur ..... , standing counsel for the delhi jal board has handed over the written submissions on behalf of the delhi jal board which are taken on record ..... the delhi jal board has disclosed that complaints regarding the damage to the old ac water line were made by the writ petitioner himself and other residents of ..... was on account of regular complaints regarding the damage to the pipes and the water from the residents as well as the local mla that work was commenced in public ..... the residents of gali no.3, north chajjupur, shahdara stated approaching the delhi jal board about the progress of the work, evasive reply was received and digging commenced in gali no.1 on 24th february, 2018 as a cover of act. ..... justice c.hari shankar judgment (oral) gita mittal, acting chief justice crl.m.a.no.7207/2018 allowed, subject to ..... : hon'ble the acting chief justice hon'ble ..... april25 2018 aj acting chief justice c.hari shankar, .....

Cmdr. S.P. Puri Vs. Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2008(3)ARBLR465(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ635

..... reported in : [1988]3scr426 , gujarat water supply and sewerage board v. ..... ) has filed objections under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the act, for short) challenging the award dated 13th july, 2005 passed by the arbitral tribunal, consisting of three arbitrators appointed by the national stock exchange of india ltd.2 ..... it is also pointed out that in view of section 31(3) of the act, arbitrators are required to give a reasoned award.7. ..... other objections raised under section 34 of the act have no merit and are dismissed. ..... proviso to subsection 3 of section 31 the present act permits unreasoned award in cases where parties have agreed to such an award being passed ..... it is not the requirement of section 31(3) of the act, that the arbitrator must elaborately discuss all contentions raised by the parties ..... even in reply dated 30th july, 2004 to the legal notice dated 14th july, 2004 issued under the negotiable instruments act, 1882 no such claim is made. ..... even under the present act, an arbitration award need not have reasons if there is an arbitration agreement to that ..... bhambani reported in 0043/1988 : jt1988(1)sc342 , indian oil corporation ..... to satisfy the requirements of the act, reasons should be intelligible comprehensible, but need not be unnecessarily lengthy or elaborate ..... may note here that non-speaking awards under the arbitration act, 1940 are valid. ..... delhi development authority reported in ilr (1987) 2 del 526, bank of baroda v. b.j .....

Mrs. Rena Drego Vs. Lalchand Soni, Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)74; AIR1998SC1990; 1998(3)ALLMR(SC)173; JT1998(2)SC369; 1998(2)SCALE256; (1998)3SCC341; [1998]2SCR197

..... jagan nath ashok kumar, : [1988]1scr180 , this court has stated that 'the word 'reasonable' has in law prima facie meaning of reasonable in regard to those circumstances of which the actor, called upon to act reasonably, knows or ought to know. ..... (as his lordship then was) in gujarat water supply & sewerage board v. ..... when landlord may recover possession:-(1) notwithstanding anything contained in this act (but subject to the provisions of section 15 and 15a, a landlord shall be entitled to recover possession of any premises if the court is satisfied. ..... while interpreting the word 'reasonable' in section 13 of the act, the bombay high court has suggested in krishchand moorjimal v. ..... there is no legal requirement that the person who claims eviction on the ground under section 13(1)(g) of the act shall specify the area in his possession. ..... in municipal corporation of delhi v. ..... the material portion of section 13(1)(g) of the act is the following:'13. ..... net very wide covering a variety of grounds to have a decree for eviction, but what ultimately survived among them was the ground envisaged in section 13(1)(g) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act, 1947 (for short 'the act'), i.e. ..... we find no justification for the high court for quashing the decree of eviction passed by a competent court on satisfaction of the ground under section 13(1)(g) of the act. .....

Bhim Singh & Ors vs.delhi Jal Board

Court : Delhi

..... pw2/c proved that land admeasuring 48 bighas 7 biswas in khasra no.4 of village azadpur was transferred by military estate officer delhi to delhi water & sewarage board and the petitioners had not led evidence of possession since 1945; even otherwise, limitation of 12 years does not apply against government vide section 25 of limitation act, 1963, the period of limitation against government is of 30 years; and, (vii) the petitioners had been granted ample opportunity by estate officer and there was no violation of ..... aggrieved from the order dated 19th may, 2005 of the estate officer, ppas no.05/and 06/supra under section 9 of pp act were filed and which have been dismissed vide common order impugned in this petition, reasoning (i) that as per order dated 22nd july, 1988 disposing of the earlier appeals preferred by the petitioners, the estate officer was to determine whether the land fell in khasra no.4 of village azadpur; (ii) that the respondent djb, pursuant to ..... on the aforesaid contention of petitioners, ppas no.4/83 andwere disposed off vide order dated 22nd july, 1988, by remanding the matter to the estate officer, to, after recording fresh evidence, determine the khasra number of the land in possession of the ..... a reading of the order dated 22nd july, 1988 in earlier appeals preferred by the petitioners against the order of the estate officer shows that the petitioners were then claiming to be in adverse possession of the land and that though the petitioners were denying .....

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Sukhpal Singh Bal Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : III(2005)ACC785; AIR2005SC3324; 2005(4)AWC3073(SC); JT2005(8)SC115; (2005)7SCC615

..... it states that notwithstanding anything contained in section 9, no transport vehicle shall ply in the state under a temporary permit granted under the 1988 act unless the vehicle has paid a tax under section 4 calculated at the appropriate rate specified in the first schedule, as also additional tax under section 5 calculated at the appropriate rate specified in the sixth ..... counsel next contended that the vehicle in question was 'goods carriage' operating under national permit granted under section 88(12) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short 'the m.v. ..... act, 1988') and, therefore, it was liable to pay additional tax at the rate applicable to such 'goods carriage' under part 'b' of the third schedule [see: section 5(1)(b) of the 1997 act ..... act, 1988 by an authority having jurisdiction outside ..... act, 1988 by a authority in state of ..... act, 1988 can ply in ..... act, 1988 or under permit by section 88(9) of the said ..... act, 1988 or under national permit granted under section 88(12) of the ..... act, 1988 and, therefore, there was no discrimination between the two categories as ..... act, 1988 and goods carriage plying under permits granted by authorities outside uttar pradesh for inter-state route partly lying in uttar pradesh and, therefore, there was no discrimination to the levy of additional ..... the case of goods carriage plying under permits granted by the state authorities, the tax payable is different from the goods carriage operated under national permits granted under section 88(12) of the 1988 act. .....

Krishan Chander Bandral Vs. State of Jandk; and ors

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

..... now, therefore in exercise of powers conferred under section 7(1) of building operation act, 1988 read with jammu 2 minicipal area building operation controlling authority s no:- 4 dated 27.11.1999. ..... now, therefore, in exercise of powers vested in me under section 8(1) of the j&k control of building operation act, 1988 read with jammu minicipal area building controlling authority no:4. ..... admittedly, notice under section 7(1) of the act of 1988 does not allege any of the contingencies as are referred to in section 7(1) of the act of 1988. ..... admittedly, notice has been issued under section 7(1) of the jammu and kashmir control of building operations act, 1988 (for short the act of 1988). ..... section 7(1) of the act of 1988 is taken note of: 7. ..... issuance of such type of notice is not authorized by section 7(1) of the act of 1988. ..... notice dated 21.07.2012 does not refer to any such contravention, as mentioned in section 7(1) of the act of 1988. ..... the said order is taken note of: subject : notice under section 8(1) of j&k control of building operation act, 1988. ..... h dated 27.11.1999, i hereby direct the sealing of premises for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this act, and i therefore, direct for the sealing of the mentioned premises under this act, immediately. 4. .....

Amrin Rafiq Shah Vs. The President

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.49/2011 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.49/2011 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.183/2010 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed - 8 - nc:2024. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.39/2011 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.185/2010 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.157/2010 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.182/2010 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.195/2010 on the file of member, addl. ..... is filed u/sec.173(1) of mv act, 1988, against the judgment and award dated:18-04-2012 passed in mvc no.195/2010 on the file of member, addl. .....