Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi rent control act 1958 repealed schedule iii the third schedule Page 98 of about 2,135 results (0.199 seconds)

Aug 28 2020 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Ashok Kumar Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... , in which the power is to be exercised, is specifically indicated, as we have noticed on a perusal of sections 19 and 20. section 68 of the gold control act, 1968 has expressly conferred power of arrest, the conditions in which the power could be exercised and further procedure to be followed.137. we have noticed that the inspector ..... emphasis supplied) 69. this was a case where the fir had been quashed by the high court under section 482 crpc on the ground that the police officer at delhi was not having territorial jurisdiction. it was a case under section 498a of the ipc. this court set aside the judgment of the high court quashing the fir, ..... having jurisdiction over the area in which the crime was said to have been committed. (emphasis supplied) 9 air1993sc264492 68. in satvinder kaur v. state (govt. of nct of delhi) and another10, this court held, inter alia, as follows: to investigate. 10. it is true that territorial jurisdiction also is prescribed under sub-section (1) to the extent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2020 (SC)

The Project Director Project Implementation Unit Vs. P.v. Krishnamoort ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... ) vol v c1769 :1964. all wr (hc) 512 :1964. all cr r379[u.p. road side land control act (10 of 1965), section 2(6)]. national highways means the highways specified in the schedule to the national highways act, 1956 or any other highway declared as national highway under sub section (2) of section 2 of the said ..... 14.9.2006 reads thus: (published in the gazette of india, extraordinary, part ii, and section 3, sub section (ii) ministry of environment and forests new delhi 14th september, 2006 notification s.o. 1533 whereas, a draft notification under sub rule (3) of rule 5 of the environment (protection) rules, 1986 for imposing ..... of tamil nadu & ors. vs. l. krishnan & ors., (1996) 1 scc250 secretary, ministry of chemicals & fertilizers, government of india vs. cipla ltd. & ors., (2003) 7 scc1 delhi development authority & anr. vs. joint action committee, allottee of sfs flats & ors., (2008) 2 scc672 sooraram pratap reddy & ors. vs. district collector, ranga reddy district & ors., (2008) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2022 (SC)

Maniben Maganbhai Bhariya Vs. District Development Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... conditions of his employment and which are paid or are payable to him in cash and includes dearness allowance but does not include any bonus, commission, house rent allowance, overtime wages and any other allowance.29. the definition of wages is very wide. it means all emoluments which are earned by an employee on duty ..... to him in cash and includes dearness allowance but does not include any bonus, commission, house rent allowance, overtime wages and any other allowance.7. act, 1972 on the genre of statutes like the minimum wages act, employees state insurance act, etc. is a welfare measure to secure social and economic justice to employees to assist them ..... followed by the delhi high court in the case of akhil bhartiya anganwadi kamgar union (regd.) (supra). these decisions, for the reasons recorded earlier, have no bearing on the issue involved in these appeals. the learned single judge was right in holding that the 1972 act was applicable to awws and awhs. the controlling authority has .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 2022 (SC)

The Secretary To Govt. Of Kerala . Vs. James Varghese .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... decide rights after hearing evidence and opposition, it is amenable to the writ of certiorari. in bharat bank ltd., delhi v. employees [(1950) scr459 the question whether an adjudication by an industrial tribunal functioning under the industrial tribunals act was subject to the jurisdiction of this court under article 136 of the 91 constitution fell to be determined: mahajan ..... justice and have some of its trappings also would fall within the ambit of article 136 and would be subject to the appellate control of this court whenever it is found and necessary to exercise that control in the interests of justice. it was also observed by fazi ali, j.at p. 463, that a body which is ..... required to act judicially and which exercises judicial power of the state does not cease to be one exercising judicial or quasi judicial functions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2023 (SC)

C.b.i. Vs. Dr. R.r. Kishore

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government.2. the delhi high court before whom the challenge was brought answered the question by holding that the ..... respondent accused was entitled to the benefit of the said provision. accordingly, the high court took the view that the matter required fresh consideration for grant of previous approval under section 6a(1) of the delhi special police establishment act ..... (b) such officers as are appointed by the central government in corporations established by or under any central act, government companies, societies and local authorities owned or controlled by that government. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), no such approval shall be necessary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2015 (SC)

Director General of Foreign Trade and Anr Vs. M/S Kanak Exports and An ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... shah v. mohanlal bhagwandas & anr.[16]., while considering the nature of amendment to section 29(2) of the bombay rents, hotel and lodging house rates control act as amended by gujarat act 18 of 1965, observed as follows: the amending clause does not seek to explain any pre-existing legislation which was ambiguous ..... the gujarat high court allowing the writ petition filed by the exporter, namely, m/s. welspun india limited. .............................................j.(a.k. sikri) .............................................j.(rohinton fali nariman) new delhi; october27 2015.-.---------------------- [1]. special civil application no.1676 of 2004 [2]. (1986) 4 scc566[3]. (2000) 10 scc619[4]. (2002) 2 scc333[5]. ..... 's letter dated 11-5-2004 (hereinafter referred to as the letter dated 11-5-2004 ). the aforesaid letter is being reproduced below: new delhi, 11-5-2004 to, the chief commissioner of income tax (cca), chandigarh subject: fixation of inter se seniority of dr and promotee income tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 22 2016 (SC)

Sayyed Ratanbhai Sayeed (D)th. Lrs and Ors Vs. Shirdi Nagar Panchayaat ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . as on the date of the decree, as well as when the execution thereof was applied for in the year 1990, neither the development plan nor the control line under the highways act was in existence, the defence of inexecutability thereof is fallacious and the finding to the contrary recorded in the earlier proceedings is patently unsustainable in law and on ..... to the 45 shopkeepers i.e. the appellants. the triangular space in which the appellants were to be temporarily rehabilitated was clearly identified by the parties. the rate of rent to be paid by them and the other stipulations pertaining to the continuing lease were also enumerated in the compromise. resultantly, a decree was passed by the trial court in ..... , as expeditiously as possible, however on proper identification.65. the appeals are dismissed, however subject to the above terms. no costs. ....................................j.(v. gopala gowda) ............................................j.(amitava roy) new delhi; february22 2016. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1963 (FN)

Kennedy Vs. Mendoza-martinez

Court : US Supreme Court

..... to separation of power and substantive constitutional restrictions and its use in the lovett, trop, perez, and speiser cases, 34 ind.l.j. 231, 279-253 (1959); comment, the communist control act of 1954, 64 yale l.j. 712, 723 (1955). [ footnote 30 ] mackenzie v. hare, 239 u. s. 299 , and savorgnan v. united states, 338 u. ..... that a fugitive draft evade "can easily cause international complications" while he remains page 372 u. s. 194 an american citizen, because the united states cannot exercise control over him while he is on foreign soil. such a "problem," obviously, exists equally with respect to any fugitive from american justice, and cannot be thought confined ..... intended to reach was obviously far from neutral. but the fact that the word "penalty" was used by an individual senator in the congressional debates is hardly controlling. as the chief justice has so wisely remarked, "how simple would be the tasks of constitutional adjudication and of law generally if specific problems could be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1986 (FN)

Fec Vs. Mass. Cit. for Life

Court : US Supreme Court

..... actors and that by organizations not benefiting from "the corporate shield which the state [has] granted to corporations as a form of quid pro quo " for various regulations. citizens against rent control v. berkeley, 454 u. s. 290 , 454 u. s. 300 (1981) (rehnquist, j., concurring). [ footnote 2/2 ] the court explains the decisions in nrwc and ncpac by reference ..... 6 ] in buckley v. valeo, 424 u. s. 1 (1976), this court said that an entity subject to regulation as a "political committee" under the act is one that is either "under the control of a candidate or the major purpose of which is the nomination or election of a candidate." id. at 424 u. s. 79 . it is undisputed on ..... and concurring in the judgment. i join parts i, ii, iii-b, and iii-c, and i concur in the court's judgment that 316 of the federal election campaign act (act), 2 u.s.c. 441b, is unconstitutional as applied to the conduct of appellee massachusetts citizens for life, inc. (mcfl), at issue in this case. i write separately, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 01 1987 (HC)

Lt. Col. H.N. Tripathi Vs. State

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 1988CriLJ582

..... with the powers, functions and privileges and be subject to the liabilities of a police officer belonging to that police force. a notification under the 1946 act, for extension of the jurisdiction of delhi spe to any other state can, however, be issued only with the consent of the state government as provided by section 6 of the 1946 ..... act. the members of the delhi spe would, thus, acquire the jurisdiction in the other states only if the notification is issued by the central government with the consent of the state ..... government may by notification in the official gazette specify the offences or class of of fences which are to be investigated by the delhi special police establishment (spe, for short). under section 5 of the 1946 act the central government has been empowered to extend to an area, the jurisdiction of the members of the spe for the investigation .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //