Court : Supreme Court of India
..... any such use in the farmer s field without due approval from cib&rc would attract appropriate legal action under central insecticides act 1968 and rules 1971, ep act 1986 and the rules made thereunder.17.3 it is learnt by the petitioners that ht transgenic mustard hybrid dmh-11 seed was sown for seed selection in kanpur and bharatpur at the directorate of rapeseed and mustard research (drmr). ..... union of india, writ petition (civil) no.12069 of 2015, filed before the delhi high court, in which the petitioner therein had challenged the price control order issued by the union of india under the essential commodities act, 1955 as regards bt cotton seeds. ..... decisions; (zq) risk management means the process, distinct from risk assessment, of evaluating policy alternatives, in consultation with all interested parties considering risk assessment and other factors relevant for the protection of health of consumers and for the promotion of fair trade practices, and, if needed, selecting appropriate prevention and control options; x x x (zu) standard , in relation to any article of food, means the standards notified by the food authority; x x x (zw) substance includes any natural or artificial substance or other matter .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... therefore, the offence which was committed under the repealed act would not cease to be triable after the repeal of the act, and section 6 of the general clauses act will come into play enabling the continuation of proceedings, including the investigation, as if the repealing had not been passed.1) nar bahaddur bhandari (air1998sc2203;2) mohammed abdul raheemkalota -vs- union of india (2009) 2 scc13) justice k s puttaswamy (retd) -vs- union of india (2019) (1) scc14) kapur chand phokraj -vs- state of bombay (air1958sc993 ..... 2018 c/w wp no.3624 of 2018 wp no.3625 of 2018 wp no.3632 of 2018 wp no.3642 of 2018 wp no.3829 of 2018 wp no.3943 of 2018 wp no.4381 of 2018 wp no.4671 of 2018 wp no.6074 of 2018 wp no.11889 of 2018 iv) if a repealing act does not make any changes to the procedure prescribed for prosecuting offences under the repealed act and expressly saves offences committed under the repealed act, the procedure prescribed under the repealed act should continue to be followed. ..... r gopinath (wp36422018) captain g r gopinath, one of the promoters of dal, who took the non- compete fee and conspired with accused no.5 in the merger process, obtained illegal gratification and gained the control of deccan charters ltd. ..... jatia vs state of nct of delhi, (2019) 17scc1932) sunil bharti ..... (1968 scc online sc32, the hon'ble supreme court held that by virtue of the provision of section 391 of the act, 1956, a scheme is statutorily binding even on creditors and shareholders who dissent from .....
Tag this Judgment!