Court : Allahabad
Reported in : AIR1993All72
..... respondents then relied upon firozi lal v. manmal : air1970sc794 . it was a case where a premiseswas governed by the rent control act and the landlord and tenant entered into compromise, the court took the view that section 13 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act provides certain restriction on ejectment of tenant and by merely entering into compromise by the parties the court .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1962P& H369
..... sri krishen v. radha kishen, air 1952 all 652. in the case before chopra, j., a petition for revision had been filed under section 35 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, and a preliminary objection was taken by the respondent that the same was not competent because the order was an appealable one and no appeal ..... orders. the language of the aforesaid sections of the indian companies act and of the provincial insolvency act is, however materially different from that of section 38 of the delhi rent control act, 1958, under which the appeal in question was filed. sub-section (1) of this section, which alone is relevant in the present case reads as ..... against the same had been preferred. this objection was repelled by the learned judge on the ground that the order in question was not one under the delhi rent control .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Reported in : (1997)2MLJ477
..... question was, what is the effect of that order. it was held that the award of the arbitrator was a nullity, since it was not passed by a rent controller under the delhi and ajmer rent control act and, there-fort, not executable.16. in goenka's case (1993) 3 s.c.c. 34 also, an argument was taken that it ..... . that decision has nothing to do with the exercise of jurisdiction by a court or tribunal. the second decision cited, which arose from the kerala buildings (lease and rent control) act, was with reference to the applicability of section 5 of the limitation act. the kerala high court has held that the appellate authority constituted under the kerala ..... to let out the building to the respondent, the respondent - handloom federation was allowed to occupy the building without prejudice to the petitioner's right to get proper rent fixed in accordance with the orders of the supreme court of india. in the application filed by the petitioner (landlord), it was further said that the building is .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1965P& H175
..... on payment of costs and ex parte proceedings were accordingly set aside. the tender of arrears of rent etc. was made on that very day. after referring to manohar lal v. bal raj, air 1953 punj 247 a case under the delhi and ajmer-marwara rent control act, 1947, the learned single judge observed that neither in law nor in equity could ..... the landlord be heard to say that the tender of arrears of rent could not come within the proviso to section 13(2) of the act. with ..... in accordance with the civil procedure code.'the facts of the above case do not show, that, when in response to summons the tenant appeared for the first time before the rent controller and prayed for an adjournment to file the written statement, he had not been served along with a copy of the application. therefore, this authority does not furnish .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 1972RLR66
..... because his lordship observed :- 'the argument that the municipal corporation was not precluded from taking into account the actual rent collected in the absence of the same being fixed by the controller under the provisions of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 was repelled by me in ram pershad's case. i can see no support for the view ..... that the taxing authority can merely have regard to the actual rent that is being collected, when the controller and the other relevant ..... letter dated february 1, 1961 addressed to the assessor & collector, municipal corporation of delhi, which is annexure 'a' with the petition, it is stated that the rent of the entire building was fixed by the court of shri tara chand aggarwal, sub judge, delhi in rent control case no. 978 of 1948. it has been further stated that the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : [1998]92CompCas680(P& H); [1998(79)FLR699]; (1997)117PLR470
..... not make a person tenant. a similar question arose before the supreme court in the case of dr. h. s. rikhy v. new delhi municipal committee, air 1962 sc 554. this was a dispute under the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952. a similar argument had been advanced and was repelled by the following findings in paragraph 6 which reads (page 558) :'it ..... was also contended that it was admitted by the respondent that rent was received and receipts for rent were granted by its agents. the use of the word .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1962SC646; [1962]2SCR947
..... on which the application of the appellant was dismissed disappears and the application must now be dealt with in accordance with law. our attention has, however, been drawn to the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (act no. xxxviii of 1952), which by s. 46 repealed the control act, 1947. that section, however, contains a saving clause which is as ..... ground is not correct and the application of the tenant-appellant for fixation of standard rent must now be determined in accordance with law. it would be for the competent authorities to consider now the effect of s. 46 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 or of any other law, bearing on the question which may ..... not exceeding 7-1/2 per cent of the cost of improvement. 27. these are, however, no grounds for holding the impugned provisions to be unconstitutional. the delhi and ajmer-marwara rent control act, 1947, came into force on 24-3-1947 originally for two years only and s. 7-a with schedule iv were introduced in september 1947. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : JT1994(5)SC49; 1994(3)SCALE712; (1994)5SCC465; [1994]Supp2SCR495
..... tenant, filed objections to the effect that he was a lawful sub-tenant and became a direct tenant under the decree holder by virtue of section 20 of the delhi & ajmer rent control act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the 1952 act). his claim was negative both by the learned single judge and the division bench of the high court ..... pay due regard to section 57 of the 1958 act. that says:57. repeal and saving:(1) the delhi & ajmer rent control act, 1952 (38 of 1952) in so far as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi is hereby repealed.(2) notwithstanding such repeal all suits and other proceedings under the said act pending at the commencement ..... notwithstanding this finding, the appeals came to be dismissed by the impugned judgment dated 31st of july, 1981, on the only ground that under section 17 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the 1958 act), the appellant had not served notice on the owner ahmedi begum. that being so, the protection available under .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Reported in : 7(1971)DLT14
..... civil revision 685-d of 1965 is whether in view of section 57 of the delhi rent control act (act 59) of 1958, section 15 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (ast 88) of 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the old act') or section 20 of the delhi rent control act (act 59) of 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the new act ) will ..... new act came into force on 9th of february, 1959, and section 57 of the same reads as follows: (1)the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (38 of 1952), in so far as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi, is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said act pending, at the ..... court or authority concerned is required to have regard to the provisions of the new act. it is only in respect of the matters relating to fixation of standard rent or eviction of the tenant that the provisions of the new act were directed to apply, and with regard to other matters pending under the act application of the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2004(2)Raj819; 2003(4)WLC790
..... tenant was empowered to sub- let the suit property. the appellant was sub-tenant. the landlord filed civil suit for eviction as the head tenant failed to pay rent. under section 20 of the delhi & ajmer rent control act, 1952, the tenant was empowered to sub-let the suit property. the suit of the landlord was decreed and in execution proceedings the high court ..... this stage, we must pay due regard to section 57 of the 1958 act. that says: '57. repeal and savings.- (1) the delhi & ajmer rent control act, 1952 (38 of 1952), insofar as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi, is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said act pending, at the commencement of this .....
Tag this Judgment!