Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 46 repeals and savings Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 4 results (0.086 seconds)

Raja Ram and Another Vs. Joint Director of Consolidation, Allahabad an ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1993All72

..... respondents then relied upon firozi lal v. manmal : air1970sc794 . it was a case where a premiseswas governed by the rent control act and the landlord and tenant entered into compromise, the court took the view that section 13 of the delhi and ajmer rent control act provides certain restriction on ejectment of tenant and by merely entering into compromise by the parties the court .....

Kamlesh Kumar Gupta Vs. Special Judge and Others

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1213

..... 7 of delhi and ajmer merwara rent control act. in that case previously there was one shop which caught fire, then the walls above a height of 4-1/2 feet were demolished. the one shop ..... the existing walls would not lake out the tenanted accommodation from the operation of the act of 1972, reliance was placed by sri qadeer on the decision in air 1953 ajmer 54 (1) (vol. 40 cn 59) in the case of durgah khwaja sahib v. ram gopal mehra. that was a case pertaining to the interpretation of the provisions of section .....

Balley Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1967All341

..... by the supreme court. the supreme court in this connection quoted with approval the following observations of mahajan, c. j. in the case of cooverjee b. bharucha v. excise commr. ajmer, 1954 scr 873 at p. 879: (air 1964 sc 220 at p 228):'it was not disputed that in order to determine the reasonableness of the restriction regard must be .....

Rani Raj Rajeshwari Devi Vs. the State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All608

..... far as the proprietor is concerned, the consequences of the court of wards assuming superintendence have been lucidly stated in the recent case of -- 'raghubir singh v. court of wards, ajmer : [1953]4scr1049 to which reference will have to be made again in dealing with the question whether the fundamental right guaranteed by article 19(1)(f) of the constitution has .....

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... that case, the land was acquired by invoking urgency provisions under section 17 for the purpose of construction of a new transmitting station for the delhi airport after the correspondence of nearly eight years among the various departments of the government before the notification and the declaration was published in the gazette ..... 13899 of 1998, it observed: the national capital region plan act, 1985 is a central legislation. the intention of this central legislation is to decongest delhi, and yet retain the conforming uses of agriculture and greens, and to harmoniously coordinate and monitor industry and urbanisation without compromising with the conforming area and ..... , the bill provides for the establishment of planning committee consisting of the officers and town planners of the participating states and the union territory of delhi, to assist the planning board to discharge its functions. the bill also contains the provisions which are necessary to give effect to the aforesaid objects .....

Sagir Ahmad and ors. Vs. the Govt. of the State of Uttar Pradesh and o ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1954All257

..... to discuss those cases.147. the last point argued was that this act authorises the cancellation of permits granted by the officers of other states, namely, the state of delhi, and to this extent the act is ultra vires the u. p. legislature. this objection also is without substance, because the act authorises the cancellation of those permits ..... case.119. the next case cited by the learnedcounsel is also a supreme court case reported in -- 'raghubir singh v. court of wards : [1953]4scr1049 . the state of ajmer passed act no. 42 of 1950, and section 112 of that act provided that if a landlord habitually infringed the rights of a tenant under the act, he was deemed ..... of the supreme court reported in : [1950]1scr566 ', in this case rashid ahmad used to carry on the wholesale business in vegitables and fruits at kairana in a rented shop in a part of the town. on the 19th april, 1949 the municipal board of kairana passed certain bye-laws providing that wholesale business in vegetables shall be .....

Trivikram NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1987All362

..... , (s. p. mittal v. union of india, : [1983]1scr729 ). the hon'ble court after referring to the principle enunciated in shirur math's case : [1954]1scr1005 followed in durgah committee, ajmer v. syed husain ali, : [1962]1scr383 held : 'the words 'religious denomination, in article 26 of the constitution must take their colour from the word 'religion' and if this be so ..... settled that article 26 does not create rights in any denomination which it never had. they merely safeguard and guarantee the continuance of the existing rights. 46. in durgah committee, ajmer v. s. hussain ali, : [1962]1scr383 , the supreme court said : --'it is obvious that article 26(c) and (d) do not create rights in any denomination or its section which .....