Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 36 limitation Page 3 of about 3,078 results (0.247 seconds)

Nov 05 1982 (HC)

Mewa Devi and ors. Vs. Sri Kishan Das and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1983Delhi176; 23(1983)DLT148; 1983(4)DRJ161; 1983RLR73

..... for residential purpose and the premises not let for residential purpose. 1947 act was not applicable at all to vacant land. the 1947 act was repealed by the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (act no. xxxviii of 1952) hereinafter referred to as 1952 act' and this act again contained provisions from sections 6 to 9 for ..... for the consideration of these questions that the matter has now been placed before us.(13) for the urban area of delhi, the first comprehensive legislation for control of rents and evictions was introduced by way of the delhi and ajmer-merwara rent control act, 1947 (act no. xix of 1947) (hereinafter referred to as '1947 act'. section 2(d) ..... of the 1947 act denned tenant as under:- (d) 'tenant' means a person who takes on rent any premises for his own .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1967 (HC)

Rattan Chand and ors. Vs. Arora Provision Stores

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 4(1968)DLT61

..... ) because the purpose which appears to me to have been intended to ha achieved by this proviso is to apply to the pending controversies the provisions of the delhi and ajmer rent control act of 1952. i do nto find any principle on which the appeals should have been allowed to be governed by the previous act and nto the ..... iny attention to section 57 of the said act which reals as under :- '57. repeal and savings.-(i) the delhi and ajmer rent control act, ;952 (33 of 1952), in so far as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi is hereby repealed. (2) ntowithstanding such repeal, all suits and toher proceedings under the said act pending, at the ..... arora, learned counsel for the respondent m/s. arora provision stores, has raised a preliiminary objection that no petition for revision is competent in the present cass. the delhi rent control act no 50 of 1958 was enforced 31st december, 1958 and the present revision was presented in this court on 9th august, 1963. it is argued that under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 1981 (HC)

Manphul Singh Sharma Vs. Ahmedi Begum and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1982Delhi87; 20(1981)DLT364; 1981(2)DRJ262; ILR1982Delhi253

..... and on passing of the decree of ejectment against the tenant he became a direct tenant of the entire property under the decree-holder under section 20 of the delhi & ajmer rent control act, 1952 (hereinafter called the 1952 act'). his objections were decided by jagjit singh, j. on 23rd february, 1968. it was held that though the ..... section 57 of the 1958 act. this section reads as under; '57: repeal and savings: (1) the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 (38 of 1952) in so far as it is applicable to the union territory of delhi, is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said act pending, at ..... under the sub-tenant surinder kumar sharma. the appellants allege that they sent separate notices regarding creation of sub-tenancy in their favor under section 17 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter called the 1858 act'). the appellants claim that they have been in occupation of the premises in their possession as lawful subtenants .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1993 (HC)

M/S. Daily Foods Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1993Delhi278

..... of the words 'shall have regard to the provisions of the act' as appearing in section 57(2) of delhi rent control act. 1958 came up for consideration. the delhi rent control act, 1958 has repealed the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952. section 57(2) provides that notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said ..... abundance as mr. madan lokur, learned counsel appearing for ministry of agriculture, very fairly conceded that during the period in question the milk available in delhi was in abundance. learned counsel, however, contended that restriction under paragraph 20 on production of milk product can be imposed by the controller even when ..... says that there is no nexus between the prohibition on conversion of skimmed milk into skimmed milk powder and the object of maintaining milk supply in delhi. according to petitioner, there is no reasonable basis to prohibit the conversion of skimmed milk into skimmed milk powder when manufacture of desi ghee, khoya .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 1973 (HC)

Murari Lal Vs. Abdul Ghaffar and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi45; 1974RLR39

..... act. (10) the act came into force on february 9, 1959. by its section 57 the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, in so far as it was applicable to the union territory of delhi, was repealed. (11) before the delhi and ajmer rent control act came into force, which was with effect from june 9, 1952, a sub-tenancy could ..... singh, j.(1) in this second appeal the only question which arises for decision is as to whether under the provisions of section 18 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') murarilal appellant can be deemed to have become a tenant holding directly under the landlords in ..... be validly created with the consent of the landlord but it was not necessary to obtain a written consent. experience showed that it was often very difficult to ascertain whether a sub-tenancy was lawfully created. to remove this difficulty while enacting the delhi rent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1965 (SC)

Lakhmi Chand Khemani Vs. Smt. Kauran Devi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC1003; [1966]2SCR544

..... appellant was a tenant under him in respect of certain accommodation in the building. on june 3, 1955, mehtab singh filed a suit under the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 against the appellant for his ejectment. on october 11, 1956 that suit was decreed. the appellant filed an appeal against that decree which, however, was dismissed on ..... also that no civil court had jurisdiction to entertain it in view of s. 50 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 which had come into force on february 19, 1959 repealing the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 in so far as that act applied to delhi, as he continued to be a tenant of the rooms in spite of the decree in favour ..... issues nos. 2 and 3 together and held that the real question involved in them was whether the appellant was a tenant. he observed that s. 2(1) of the delhi rent control act, 1958 no doubt provided that a tenant for the purpose of the act would 'not include any person against whom any order or decree for eviction has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2004 (HC)

Khazan Chand Nathi Ram Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : [2004]136STC261(P& H)

..... act.12. in manphul singh sharma's case : (1994)5scc465 , the honourable supreme court was considering the matter where the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, was repealed by the delhi rent control act, 1958. sub-section (2) of section 57 of the delhi rent control act, 1958, contemplated that notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the said act pending at the commencement .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1993 (HC)

Daily Foods Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1993(25)DRJ514

..... of the words 'shall have regard to the provisions of the act' as appearing in section 57(2) of delhi p73 rent control act, 1958 came up for consideration. the delhi rent control act, 1958 has repealed the delhi and ajmer rent control act. 1952. section 57(2) provides that notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under the ..... in abundance as mr.madan lokur, learned counsel appearing for ministry of agriculture, very fairly conceded that during the period in question the milk available in delhi was in abundance. learned counsel, however, contended that restriction under paragraph 20 on production of milk product can be imposed by the controller even when ..... says that there is no nexus between the prohibition on conversion of skimmed milk into slammed milk powder and the object of maintaining milk supply in delhi. according to petitioner, there is no reasonable basis to prohibit the conversion of slammed milk into skimmed milk powder when manufacture of desi ghee, khoya .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1992 (HC)

Subhash Manchanda Vs. Maya Devi

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 48(1992)DLT449; 1992(24)DRJ94; 1992RLR394

..... of a residence. it nowhere speaks of a suitable residence. it is pertinent to note that this factor of suitability was recognised in the earlier act, namely, delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952 which has been repealed by the present act of 1958, and this expression suitable has been deleted from the latter act. the inference is ..... tenant, certain limited rights to get possession of tenancy premises in certain given circumstances or contingencies have also been conferred on the landlord which, in the case of delhi rent control act, 1958, are set out in various clauses of the proviso to section 14(1).(15) the intention of the legislature that a tenant should not ..... inescapable that in these days of paucity of housing accommodation in delhi, the real intention is that a tenant should not be allowed to keep two residential houses- .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 1973 (HC)

Raghubir Singh Vs. Savitri Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : AIR1974Delhi108; 9(1973)DLT352; 1973RLR331

..... conditions on which the tenant would have held from the landlord, if the tenancy had continued.' 5. the 1958 act replaced and repealed the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952, hereinafter referred to as 'the 1952 act', clause (b) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 13 ..... evict a tenant on the ground referred to in clause (d) of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 14 of the delhi rent control act, 1958 hereinafter referred to as 'the 1958 act.'in a case where the premises shall be deemed to have been lawfully sub ..... bath room on the first floor and a barsati on the second floor of the house bearing municipal no. 4593, darya gunj, south estate, delhi, since may 7, 1949 that is, before the relevant date june 9, 1952 and had, thereforee, to be deamed to be a lawful ..... that a notice within the contemplation of section 17 is served in accordance with rule 21 of the delhi rent control rules, 1959 framed under section 56 of the act.'10. in tara chand v. mst. marrium bi, 1970 ren cr 438 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //