Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 36 limitation Court: kerala Page 1 of about 39 results (0.176 seconds)

Fantacy Sales Corporation Vs. Sales Tax Inspector and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : [2007]8STT33; (2007)7VST323(Ker)

..... state of assam : [1961]1scr809 , state of punjab v. jullundur vegetables syndicate : [1966]2scr457 , devi dass gopal krishnan v. state of punjab : [1967]3scr557 , municipal corporation of delhi v. birla cotton, spinning and weaving mills : [1968]3scr251 , yogesh trading co. v. intelligence officer of sales tax : air1970ker218 , govind saran ganga saran v. commissioner of sales tax ..... clear and offers sufficient guidance to the central government in exercising its powers under section 3.5. in edward mills co. ltd., beawar v. state of ajmer : (1954)iillj686sc this court considered the question whether section 27 of the minimum wages act under which power was given to the government to add to ..... and agricultural lands act was challenged as permitting excessive delegation of legislative power as it enabled the government to fix a lower rate than the maximum rent payable by the tenants of lands situate in any particular area or to fix such rate on any suitable cases as it thought fit. this court .....

Khadeeja Vs. District Collector

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT654

..... excise and the appeals were rejected by the appellate authority. appeals nos. 398 to 408 preferred against the above mentioned order before the central board of excise and customs. new delhi were also dismissed as per order dated 21.2.1980. relevant portion of the order reads as follows: as regards kallatra abdul kader haji, the board observes that the plea ..... are not directed against the legal heirs but against the properties left behind by the defaulter. 11. provision regarding confiscation of goods under the customs act is a penalty in rent enforceable against the goods while the personal penalties under section 112 and other provisions of the act are penalties in personam enforceable against the person concerned. this legal provision is .....

Sumathi Vs. S. Devasan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1991Ker295

..... issue that the petition for eviction had abated by virtue of section 50(2) of the delhi rent control act of 1958. his application for that purpose was dismissed. he took up ..... some right or liability of any party. thus, an order of the rent controller refusing to set aside an ex parte order is subject to appeal to the rent control tribunal.'bant singh gill v. shanti devi, air 1967 sc 1360 was a case under the delhi and ajmer rent control act of 1952 in which the tenant attempted to raise a preliminary ..... order impugned affected the rights or liabilities of parties and was not one merely procedural in nature. the ratio of this decision was reiterated in a case arising under the delhi rent control act, 1958 in central bank of india ltd. v. gokal chand, air 1967 sc 799. the tenant against whom a petition for eviction had been filed, applied .....

Mar Appraem Kuri Co. Ltd. Vs. Dix

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2004(1)KLT678

..... by granting the application will not outweigh the advantages to the landlord. we therefore find no illegality, irregularity or impropriety in the findings rendered by the rent control court and appellate authority.13. under such circumstance revision lacks merits and the same is dismissed. however, in the facts and circumstances of the case ..... transfer of property passes forthwith to the transferee all the interest which the transferor had in the property, including the easement annexed thereto as also the rents and profits accruing/due from that property after the transfer. if the transferor/lessor assigns any part of the property, the transferee acquires all the rights ..... may be caused to the tenant by granting the application will not outweigh the advantage to the landlord. aggrieved by the concurrent findings rendered by the rent control court and appellate authority this revision has been filed.6. counsel appearing for the tenant revision petitioner sri. p.b. krishnan submitted that the .....

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Ayilammal Syamala Thamburatti and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1980Ker82

George Vadakkel, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 8A of the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, (hereinafter, the Act) from the decision of the Forest Tribunal, palghat, under Section 8 thereof in O. A. Nos. 503 to 506 of 1975 on its file. Besides providing for an appeal to this Court from such a decision, Section 8A also prescribes therefor a period of limitation of 60 days from the date of the decision: If the time requisite for obtaining the certified copy of the order produced along with this appeal is excluded, it is well within time; and otherwise it is out of time. The principal point that is mooted herein is this question of limitation, and the answer thereto depends on the applicability or otherwise of Section 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to this appeal.2. It is not disputed that the Act is a 'special or local law' falling within Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963. Nor can there be now any controversy as regards the applicability of S...

itty Kurian and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1962Ker267

..... bean laid down by his lordship patanjall sastri, c. j, at pages 199 and 200:'this court had occasion in dr. n. b. khare v. state of delhi, 1950 scr 519: (air 1930 sc 211) to define the scope of the judicial review under clause (5) of article 19 where the phrase im-posing reasonable ..... to show the liberal interpretation that has been placed in interpreting the particular entries in the legislative lisa. in that case, the ajmer legislative assembly enacted the ajmer (sound amplifires control) act 1952 -- ajmer act iii/1952 and the said act was challenged on the ground that the state legislature has no power to enact the particular ..... . 1935 to the effect:'land, that is to say, rights in or over land, land tenures, including the relation of landlord and tenant, and the collection of rents; transfer, alienation and devolution of agricultural land; land improvement and agricultural loans; colonisation; couris of wards encumbered and attached estates; treasure trove.'91. the question was as .....

Kokkalai Rice and Oil Mills Foundry, Etc. Vs. Regional Provident Fund ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1961Ker57; (1960)IILLJ528Ker; (1960)IILLJ528Ker

Madhavan Nair, J.1. This case raises certain questions as to the scope of the Employees' Provident Funds Act, 1952 (hereafter referred to as 'the Act').2. The appellant is the owner of a factory at Kokkalai, Trichur, where several industries like rice and oil mills, foundry and engineering works, and soap works are carried on; and the respondent is the Regional Provident Funds Commissioner, Trivandrum.3. On 31-10-1952 the respondent issued a letter to the appellant requesting him to furnish the declaration and the list required by paragraphs 33 and 36 (1) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme 1952 and intimating him that collection of contributions to the Fund would commence from the 1st November 1952. That letter is marked in this case as Ext. A. Subsequently on 10-3-1953, he sent another letter to the appellant, demanding deposit of the contributions to the Fund and the administrative charges as enjoined by the Act and the Scheme. That letter is produced as Ext. B. In it the respo...

Vasudeva Menon and Others Vs. M/S. K.J. Plantation

Court : Kerala

..... 116 regulates the rights of a lessor and lessee, when a suit for ejectment is brought. in m/s. jagatjit industries ltd., new delhi v. rajiv gupta (air 1981 delhi 359), the matter arose under the delhi rent control act. it is held that the lease stands determined on the expiry of the period and eviction notice was not necessary. in mst. ..... apply even to agricultural leases on the basis of it embodying principles of equity, justice and good conscience. in this connection we may refer to a bench decision of the delhi high court in amrit lal v. mamleshwar (air 1973 del. 75). the court held as follows: "16. shri bindra placed reliance on section 117 of the transfer of ..... as much necessary for the tenant to accept a tenancy by holding over as it is for the landlord to assent to it either expressly or by acceptance of rent, as rent, or otherwise. the negative implications of the assertion by the appellant of a larger right, in our opinion, excludes a consensual bilateral act necessary to bring a .....

The State of Kerala and ors. Vs. Annam and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR1969Ker38

..... object of the order, the contention fails.36. according to mr. krishna iyer the very provision allowing concessions at different rates to producers, rent-receivers and non-producers among the stockholders, all of which are at a rate much above that given to other citizens and even to ..... stockholder has suppressed his stock, the con-cession allowed to him is only for a period of one month at the rate allowed to rent-receivers. article 14 of the constitution guarantees equality before the law and equal protection of the laws. but that does not exclude a ..... conditions of labour the workmen as a class have a direct or substantial interest.'in kanwar singh v. delhi administration, air 1956 sc 871 the supreme court held:'in the context in which it occurs in section 418(1) (of the ..... delhi municipal corporation act) the meaning which can reasonably be attached to the word 'abandoned' is 'let loose' in the .....

Dr. V.K. Rajan Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2008CriLJ909

J.B. Koshy, J.1. In all these cases, main questions to be considered are common. Validity of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Ordinance') and jurisdiction of District Judge under the Ordinance after enactment of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (in short 'P.C. Act') are the main questions to be considered in these cases. In Cri. Appeal No. 1400 of 2007 appellant was facing investigation for the case registered against him for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the P.C. Act alleging that the appellant had amassed wealth disproportionate to his income. The check period is 1-1-1994 to 12-5-2005. While the investigation was continuing, an application was filed by the Investigating Officer before the District Court for attachment of his properties invoking provisions of Sections 3 and 5 of the Ordinance. The District Court passed an order attaching certain properties scheduled in the petition. When the ...