Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: delhi and ajmer rent control act 1952 repealed section 36 limitation Court: kolkata Page 2 of about 112 results (0.387 seconds)

Sm. Sita Agarwalla and ors. Vs. Harrimally Currimbhai Lalji Sajan and ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1979Cal273,83CWN669

..... s court at alipore. on the 12th january, 1942, the second additional subordinate judge, alipore, allowed the appeal granting a decree for ejectment and confirming the decree for rents and mesne profits which the trial court had passed.6. on the 6th march, 1942, gangjee sajun & co. the lessee under the said lease preferred a second ..... what may be embodied in a contract with the landlord. the provisions of the transfer of property act afford them little protection against arbitrary eviction and enhancement of rent. to meet such a situation, the government set up of a committee of enquiry in 1938 to investigate the existing rights and obligations of the non-agricultural ..... j. the suit was decreed on august 31, 1950. the landlord obtained delivery of possession in execution of the decree on december 1, 1950. the west bengal premises rent control act, 1950 came into force on the 30th november, 1950, changing, inter alia, the definition of tenant as already noted. an appeal against the decree for .....

General Electric Co. of India Ltd. and anr. Vs. Corporation of Calcutt ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1959Cal413

..... reasonably be expected to let. on appeal to this court, guha ray and sen, jj., who heard the appeal differed on two questions namely (i) whether the standard rent, fixed as above, could be taken into consideration in determining the valuation of the building and (ii) as to the meaning of the expression 'at the-time of ..... 28. section 127 (a) of the act relates to valuation of buildings, erected for letting purposes, and the method of valuation, prescribed therein is to ascertain the gross annual rent, at which the building 'might at the time of assessment reasonably be expected to let from year to year.' in the case, : air1957cal466 , the corporation had started proceedings ..... can only be even admissible in evidence, if they are situate in the area of an authority which is a party to the appeal. such evidence, whether of rents or assessments, could amount to no more than this, that the court should take it into consideration as some guide to actual value of the hereditament under appeal; .....

Kedarnath Kanoria and ors. Vs. Khaitan Sons and Co.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1959Cal368

..... by the supreme court in the case of nalinakhya bysack v. shyam sunder haldar. : [1953]4scr533 when dealing with the marginal note of section 18 of the west bengal premises rent control act, the indication of the marginal note must yield to the clear words in the section itself. in the present case, rule 10 of order xxii is, in my .....

Tata Motors Limited and anr. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... of lease made not in the normal course of management but in anticipation of legislation for the abolition of intermediaries [see raghubir singh vs. state of ajmer reported in air 1959 475], transfer to tenant in possession by way of compulsory purchase of all lands not required by the land holder for their ..... authority is designated without any adjudicatory procedure before him and without any substantive law or principles before him.143. mr. pal referred to the decision of delhi transport corporation (supra) and submitted that it may also be characterized as excessive delegation of legislative function because what should be the amount and what principles ..... years on terms and conditions agreed and stated in the said letters.192. the petitioner paid permits and the costs of registration. the petitioner paid lease rent annually as well as all municipal and panchayet rates and taxes and other outgoings. the writ petitioner admittedly commenced the establishment of a factory and whilst .....

Kishwar Jahan and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(3)CHN857

..... of koikata police had no authority whatsoever to summon riz at lalbazar. referring to the decision reported in : 1955crilj526 , h.n. rishbud v. state of delhi, which explains what 'investigation' under the code would consist of, it was contended that examination of persons should also fall within the ambit and scope of investigation ..... , bidi leaves & tobacco merchants association v. state of bombay; : 1986crilj41 , savitri v. govind and : (1954)iillj686sc , edward mills co. ltd. v. state of ajmer.45. he proceeded to argue that the cbi could, without registration of any fir, investigate the case. in support of such submission reference was made to the manual which provides ..... medical sciences employees' union (regd.) v. union of india; : 2006crilj3283 , hari singh v. state of u.p.; 1991 cr. lj 2583, surinder singh ahluwalia v. delhi spl. police establishment; : air2008sc907 , sakiri vasu v. state of u.p.30. approach of the court in directing cbi investigation-(i) having regard to the facts and .....

Joydeep Mukherjee and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors. ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2008(2)CHN546

..... v. state of andhra pradesh]; air 1965 sc 130 [state of madhya pradesh and ors. v. champalal and ors.]; : air1967sc87 [dalchand and ors. v. delhi improvement trust (new delhi development authority), new delhi] and : air2003sc3140 [pratibha nema and ors. v. state of m.p. and ors.].65. mr. ray further contended that if a statute has directed to ..... co. ltd. v. finsbury borough council, the court held that before 1944 the claimants owned certain property consisting of fifty-five flats which were subject to the rent restriction acts. on june 24, 1944, the flats were completely demolished by enemy action, and a cost of works payment in respect of the damage was determined to ..... bombay, the situation was one in which a lease between the bombay port trust and certain parties was terminated in exercise of contractual rights and the lease rent was abnormally increased. it was held that there was always an obligation on the part of public authorities in their acts of omission and commission to be .....

G.D. Bhattar and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1957Cal483,61CWN660

..... from one, nagindas mehta, and that later on on the 11th april, 1949 another accused received a sum of rs. 25,000/- towards it at the constitution house in new delhi and forged certain documents purporting to be orders passed in official capacity and intended to confer some advantages or benefits on the panna diamond mining syndicate. the accused were charged .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Clive Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1972]85ITR531(Cal)

..... same.'9. the decision of the madras high court in the case of estate of vr. rm.s. chockalingam chettiar v. commissioner of income-tax was noted by the delhi high court at page 603. the observations of the madras high court, relied on by mr. roy and quoted earlier, are to be read and understood in the ..... entitled thereto, by deducting the tax appropriate to that income, or by crediting himself with the amount when accounting. the following classes of income are taxed at source :-- (i) rents under short leases......... (x) dividends paid by a body of persons, which includes joint stock companies.' 47. in article 309, at page 206 of the same volume, under ..... the tenants, the company admitted liability to be assessed to income tax under schedule d, but the crown claimed that, in making the assessment under schedule d, the rents, which far exceeded the annual value as assessed under schedule a must be included, allowance being made for tax assessed under schedule a. the matter came up on appeal .....

Ashok Kumar Todi Vs. Kishwar Jahan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR2011SC1254

..... two months from the date of service of authenticated copy of the order. the said order directing investigation by the cbi is contrary to the provisions of the delhi special police establishments act or any other law now in force. the investigation sought to be carried out by the cbi was therefore illegal and contrary to the ..... a copy of the said report to him. b) in any event, the purported investigation carried out by the cbi is contrary to the provisions of the delhi special police establishments act and the question of investigation by cbi without prior consent of a state government is under consideration by a larger bench of the hon'ble ..... against him for commission of offences under the indian penal code as also recommendation of departmental action. the findings of cbi were wholly without jurisdiction, ultra vires the delhi special police establishment act, null and void and completely beyond the activities required to be carried out by the cbi in terms of the order dated 16th october, .....

Kabari Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shrimati Ila Basu and ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... , to determine the lease. [please refer relevant extract attached herewith - sanjiva row - transfer of property act - volume 2 - seventh edition universal law publishing company, new delhi at pg 1832, section 111, syn.9/ marked as annexure a pg nos. 4 & 5].4. section 111(g) of the tp act makes it clear that forfeiture of ..... in contending that the consequence of such determination of lease would make mukherjees and thereby the original defendant no.9 as rank trespassers and the benefit of rent protection statute would not be extended to such persons. the defendants would rather presume and contend that consequent upon such determination of lease a monthly tenancy ..... would only establish that notwithstanding any such agreement on 4th september, 1978 as alleged by the original defendant no.9, the said defendants continued to pay rent to the estate of amiya mukhjerjee and till the filing of the suit for specific performance. the character of the said defendants continued to remain as tenants .....