Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1977Cal199,(1977)1CompLJ175(Cal),82CWN252
..... authorities concernedi to remove those unauthorised structures. since the tenant did not do so, the suit was filed by the landlord under section 13(1)(k) of the delhi and ajmer rent control act, 1952.12. in the other appeal, being appeal no. 121 of 1963, also the facts were similar and the suit was filed on the basis ..... 1574. two appeals were heard analogously by the supreme court wherein a common question with respect to the application of the first proviso to section 57(2) of the delhi rent control act, 1958, came up for consideration and the said provision is in the following terms;section 57(2): notwithstanding such repeal, all suits and other proceedings under ..... , apart from denying the material allegations, contended that he was a tenant in the premises in question from the predecessor-in-interest of the plaintiff respondent at a rent of rs. 24/- per month, payable according to english calendar month and at first his tenancy consisted of 2 rooms and a privy which was used by him .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR2006Cal102
ORDERKalyan Jyoti Sengupta, J.1. Both the aforesaid applications were heard together as the points involved in both the matters are identical. Both these two applications owe their origin to the judgment and order dated 17th March, 2004. This order was passed on settlement being arrived at by and between the plaintiff on the one hand and the defendant Nos. 3 and 4 on the other. In view of the settlement and on the basis of suggestion given to the Court by both the parties this order was passed. In terms of this order the defendant No. 3 being the applicant of G. A. No. 3035 of 2004 was directed to transfer the property atJagmohan Village, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as the said property) to the plaintiff in terms of the agreement dated 7th September, 2000 read with the agreement dated 12th September, 2002 for consideration of Rs. 21.10 crores. The plaintiff is directed to make ready at its own costs the stamp paper and complete all legal formalities require...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1878)ILR3Cal64
..... named therein.' by section 5 the administration of civil, and criminal justice and the superintendence of the settlement and realization of the public revenue and of all matters relating to rent within the said territory, are vested in such officers as the said lieutenant-governor may, for the purpose of tribunals of first instance, or of reference and appeal, from time ..... it, and if so, in what district and to what extent. he might possibly have determined only to apply the provisions of section 5, relating to the public revenue and rent, and of section 7, as to cesses, in one tract, while he applied the whole law in another. the supreme legislature could have no knowledge beforehand of what would be .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1891)ILR18Cal652
..... . no doubt the dewani and the regulations recognised ferries in the sense that engagements to pay tolls were not absolutely illegal, and so they did in regard to ground rents in markets; but not in the sense that the owners possessed a monopoly. we have not been able to find the other authorities referred to either in the case ..... of the existence of a monopoly. it decided, and decided only, that the lessee of collections made on a bridge erected in place of a ferry must pay the rent specified in his lease. no reference was made in it to the case decided in 1852. but the point was in issue in the case of parmeshari proshad narain ..... plaintiffs stated that the permutta-guzarghat-aglapur ferry was settled with their predecessors in title with the settlement of a 6-anna share of pergunnah khalilabad entered in the government rent-roll as no. 113; and they asserted that from the time of the permanent settlement downwards till about 1286 they had been in undisputed possession of this ferry, they .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : (1910)ILR37Cal467
Lawrence H. Jenkins, C.J.1. The appellant, Ashok Chandra Nandy, having died since the institution of these appeals, there are at present before the Court 18 appellants, all of whom have been convicted under Chapter VI of the Indian Penal Code of offences against the State. Two of the appellants, Barindra Kumar Ghose and Ullaskar Dutt, were convicted under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death; eight of them, i.e., Indra Nath Nandi, Upendra Nath Banerjee, Bibhuti Bhusan Sircar, Hrishikesh Kanjilal, Sudhir Kumar Sircar, Sailendra Nath Bose, Hem Chandra Das and Barendra Chandra Sen, were convicted under Sections 121, 121A., 122 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to transportation for life; Abinash Chandra Bhattacharjee was convicted under Sections 121 and 121A of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to transportation for life: Indu Bhushan Roy was convicted under Sections 121A and 122 and sentenced to transportation for life; Pares Chandra Maulik,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : 7Ind.Cas.359
Lawrence Jenkins, C.J.1. The appellant, Ashok Chandra Nandy having died since the institution of these appeals, there are at present before the Court 18 appellants, all of whom have been convicted under Chapter VI of the Indian Penal Code of offences against the State. Two of the appellants, Barindra Kumar Ghose and Ullaskar Dutt, were convicted under Sections 121, 121A and 122 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to death eight of them, i.e., Indra Nath Nandi, Upendra Nath Banerjee, Bibhuti Bhusan Sircar, Hrishikesh Kanjilal, Sudhir Kumar Sircar, Sailendra Nath Bose, Hem Chandra Das and Barendra Chandra Sen, were convicted under Sections 121, 121A, 122 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to transportation for life; Abinash Chandra Bhattacharjee was convicted under Sections 121 and 121A of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to transportation for life: Indu Bhushan Roy was convicted under Sections 121A and 122 and sentenced to transportation for life, Pares Chandra Maulik, Sisir...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1924Cal257
Mookerjee, J.1. This is an application for review of a criminal case on the certificate of the Advocate-General under Clause 26 of the Letters Patent. The petitioner Barendra Kumar Ghose was tried on the 16th and 17th August at the fourth Criminal Sessions of this year by Mr. Justice Page and a Special Jury, on a charge of offences punishable under sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code. He pleaded not guilty to the first count and guilty to the second count. The Jury returned a unanimous verdict of guilty of murder, with the result that the accused was convicted and sentenced to death under Section 302. On the 22nd August an application was made on his behalf to the Advocate-General for a certificate under clause 26 of the Letters Patent. On the 27th August, the Advocate-General heard Counsel for the prisoner in support of the application. On the 29th August, the Advocate-General granted a certificate in the following terms:Certificate of the Advocate-General of Bengal under cl...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1931Cal298
..... this court which has been filed a day too late.11. the relevant facts necessary for deciding this question are as follows : the plaintiffs, opposite parties, obtained a decree for rent against the petitioner and other persons on 17th july 1927. against this decree the petitioner preferred an appeal to the district judge of bankura which was dismissed by him on ..... should not be registered though filed out of time.2. there is no dispute as to the facts:the plaintiffs, opposite parties brought a suit for recovery of arrears of rent alleged to be due from the present petitioner (defendant l) and several other persons. that suit was decreed on 17th july 1927, and an appeal by defendant 1 was dismissed .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1942Cal180
..... a gift, would be a sufficient transmutation of possession.92. no authority whatever has been cited to substantiate the contention that the reversion and the right to receive rent which were vested in the settlor at the time of the wakf could not constitute mowkoof. it is hardly necessary to observe that such a proposition would have the ..... portion of the corpus was postponed until the expiry of the lease, and secondly because in any case the reversion remaining in the wakif and his right to receive rent from an intermediate lessee could not ever be mowkoof (thing appropriated). in support of this-argument, the conditions of a wakf according, to shia law were adverted to ..... was in supersession of an earlier lease which the prince had executed in her favour for the selfsame properties under which rs. 1500 was payable as the net monthly rent. on 14th june 1917, the prince executed a wakfnama (ex. e-a 38) which covered those twenty-eight items of immovable property included in shaheba khatoon's .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kolkata
Reported in : AIR1952Cal656,56CWN453
..... act on their own knowledge and on their own inspection and give decision without hearing either party, unless a party claims to be heard, see 'r. v. brighton and area rent tribunal,' (1.950) 1 all er 946. many persons exercise judicial functions besides those who are called judges. mere names are not a safe guide for discovering -where the judicial ..... that court primarily exists in its appellate jurisdiction to deal with disputed questions of fact'.75. a similar view was taken in india in the case of 'khurshed mody v. rent controller, bombay', air 1947 bom 46,in which it was held that the high court would not refuse to issue a writ of certiorari merely because there was a right .....
Tag this Judgment!