Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2002KAR2304; 2003(3)KarLJ505
ORDERR.V. Raveendran, J.1. Respondents 1 to 6 were the petitioners and petitioners 1 and 2 were respondents 1(1) and 1(5) in HRC No. 10568 of 1994, on the file of the Court of Small Causes, Bangalore. Respondents 7 to 13 herein were the respondents 1(2), 1(3), 1(4), 1(7), 1(8), 1(9) and 1(10) respectively in the said eviction petition. For convenience, respondents 1 to 6 will be referred to as 'landlords' and the petitioners 1 and 2 and respondents 7 to 13 will together be referred as 'tenants'.2. The said eviction petition was filed by the landlords against the tenants (the L.Rs of A. Rajagopal who was running Mercury Press in the petition schedule premises) under Section 21(1) proviso (h) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 (for short, the 'old HRC Act' or 'old Act'). The petition schedule premises is a non-residential premises, measuring more than 14 sq. nits. The said petition was allowed by order dated 17-11-2001 under proviso (h) to Section 21(1) of the said Act. Feeling aggr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2000KAR2437; 2000(4)KarLJ319
ORDER1. The suit for recovery of unpaid purchase money was decreed by the Trial Court and the decree is resisted and challenged in this revision by the defendant-purchaser, which is at Ex. P. 2. Ex. P. 2 reads as follows:'This agreement dated 29th October, 1979 in favour of M.R. Umakanth, s/o M.V. Ramaiah, residing at Door No. 2023, Mandi-mohallha, Turabali Street, Mysore by S.I. Kamaruddin Shah, s/o Late Syed Mohiddin, residing in the same number. This day i.e., 29-10-1979, I have purchased your house for consideration. In the said house, one Sri S. Narayana is residing as mortgagee and the mortgage period is one year and one month more. Immediately after vacation of the premises by the mortgagee and taking possession by me, I will pay Rs. 5,000-00 (Rupees Five Thousand only) and take an acknowledgement (shara) from you and take back this agreement. Executed the agreement accordingly'. That being the case, the Trial Court ought to have connected those payments to the suit transaction ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1986KAR382
ORDERPatil, J.1. In these two revisions filed under Section 50 of the Karnataka Rent Control Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act, the tenants have sought to challenge the legality and correctness of the orders of eviction dated 24-6-1981 and 3-10-1980 passed by the XI Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, Bangalore City, and the III Additional Civil Judge, Bangalore City, in H.R.C. No. 23 of 1980 and H.R.C. No. 400 of 1975, respectively, on their file.2. Two non-residential shop premises bearing Nos. 57 and 58 situated in Old Taragupet, Bangalore, in occupation of the petitioners are the subject of dispute. They originally belonged to three sisters, namely, Girijamma, Renuka and Sarvamangala, daughters of Veeranna Gubbi, and they were let out together as one unit to Petitioner-1 herein Sree Nataraja Flour Mills and Perfumery Works, on a monthly rent of Rs. 170/-. Petitioner-2 M. A. Narayana Murthy, his father M. V. Aswathanarayana Shetty and B. K. Srinivasa Murthy (Respondent-6 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR1998KAR3104
ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J.1. By these Revision Petitions which have been moved under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the revisionist applicants have challenged the orders dated April 15, 1993 and 3rd July 1993 in E.A.T. Appeal Nos.5/92 and 6/92 respectively passed by the Educational Appellate Tribunal No. 1, Bijapur.2. The facts of the case in brief are that the teacher who is also an employee of the respondent-institution, having felt aggrieved from inaction of the Management-Board in not paying his salary from 1.6.1989 till 1.3.1992, the Management having replied to the notice issued by the employee, filed an appeal under Section 8 of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 and the Tribunal, after having considered the matter, issued the following directions:-'In the result, the appeal is allowed. Acting under Section 10(4) of the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 the following order is ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Reported in : ILR2000KAR5057; 2001(4)KarLJ78
ORDER1. Petitioner-M/s. Lahari Recording Company Private Limited, Bangalore, is defendant in O.S. No. 8125 of 1998, and respondent-M/s. SourabhMarketing and Agencies Private Limited is the plaintiff therein. They are hereinafter referred according to their position in the said suit which is pending on the file of the Trial Court.2. The Trial Court's order dated 1-9-1999 made in O.S. No. 8125 of 1998 rejecting defendant's application i.e., I.A. No. I, filed under Order 7, Rule 11(d) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('CPC' in short) with costs is called in question in this revision. The said application was filed praying to dismiss the plaintiffs suit as its institution in the Civil Court and the jurisdiction of the Court below to try the same is barred by the provisions of the Copyright Act, 1957 ('the Act' in short).2-A. Order VII, Rule 11 of the CPC contemplates rejection of plaint on certain grounds. The relevant clause (d) of Order VII, Rule 11 reads:'11. Rejecti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.54 OF2021AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1068 OF2020IN CRL.A.118 OF2021 BETWEEN:1. Sri. Rangaswamy @ Ranga S/o Ramakrishnappa Aged about 31 years R/at Rangaswamy Provision Store 13th Cross, Near Mullakatamma Temple Mayura Nagara, Andrahalli Main Road Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058.2. Sri. R. Shankar S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 29 years R/at No.106, 2nd Cross 1st Main, Sanjeevini Nagar Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. 23. Sri. Raghavendra @ Raghu S/o. Jayaram Aged about 29 years R/at Om Shakthi Temple Road Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. ...Appellants (By Sri. B.V. Acharya Sr. Counsel for Sri. Vishnumurthy - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka By Chamarajpet Police Station Rep. by Special Publ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.54 OF2021AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1068 OF2020IN CRL.A.118 OF2021 BETWEEN:1. Sri. Rangaswamy @ Ranga S/o Ramakrishnappa Aged about 31 years R/at Rangaswamy Provision Store 13th Cross, Near Mullakatamma Temple Mayura Nagara, Andrahalli Main Road Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058.2. Sri. R. Shankar S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 29 years R/at No.106, 2nd Cross 1st Main, Sanjeevini Nagar Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. 23. Sri. Raghavendra @ Raghu S/o. Jayaram Aged about 29 years R/at Om Shakthi Temple Road Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. ...Appellants (By Sri. B.V. Acharya Sr. Counsel for Sri. Vishnumurthy - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka By Chamarajpet Police Station Rep. by Special Publ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.118 OF2021CONNECTED WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.53 OF2021 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.54 OF2021AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1068 OF2020IN CRL.A.118 OF2021 BETWEEN:1. Sri. Rangaswamy @ Ranga S/o Ramakrishnappa Aged about 31 years R/at Rangaswamy Provision Store 13th Cross, Near Mullakatamma Temple Mayura Nagara, Andrahalli Main Road Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058.2. Sri. R. Shankar S/o. Ramaiah Aged about 29 years R/at No.106, 2nd Cross 1st Main, Sanjeevini Nagar Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. 23. Sri. Raghavendra @ Raghu S/o. Jayaram Aged about 29 years R/at Om Shakthi Temple Road Hegganahalli, Peenya 2nd Stage Bengaluru 560 058. ...Appellants (By Sri. B.V. Acharya Sr. Counsel for Sri. Vishnumurthy - Advocate) AND: State of Karnataka By Chamarajpet Police Station Rep. by Special Publ...
Tag this Judgment!