Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Page 1 of about 11,174 results (0.084 seconds)

Jaison Vs. State of Kerala, rep. by Public Prosecutor

Court : Kerala

..... cessation of the violent symptoms of the disorder, but a restoration of the faculties of the mind sufficiently to enable the person soundly to judge the act; but the expression does not necessarily mean complete or prefect restoration of the mental faculties to their original condition. so, if there is such a ..... the time or immediately afterwards, also by evidence of his mental condition and other relevant factors. every person is presumed to know the natural consequences of his act. similarly every person is also presumed to know the law. the prosecution has not to establish these facts. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [11]. the section itself provides that ..... insanity is proved or admitted, certain considerations have to be borne in mind. mayne summarises them as follows:"whether there was deliberation and preparation for the act; whether it was done in a manner which showed a desire to concealment ; whether after the crime, the offender showed consciousness of guilt and made efforts .....

M/S.Muthoot Finance Ltd Vs. Corporation of Cochin

Court : Kerala

..... affects his interest 5 (1999) 2 klt465 6 (2009) 3 klt92 wpc224214 15 only from the issuance of notifications and declarations under the land acquisition act; therefore, any attempt to curb the rights of the owners of lands, until the publication of those statutory notifications and declarations, would result in infraction ..... exhibit wpc224214 2 p2 environmental clearance by the ministry of environment & forests, government of india, new delhi; (2) exhibit p3 composite consent under various pollution acts issued by kerala state pollution control board; (3) exhibit p4 no objection certificate issued by airports authority of india; (4) exhibit p5 no objection certificate issued ..... minister of environment & forest, government of india, new delhi by letter dated0311.2010. exhibit-p3: true copy of the composite consent under various pollution acts issued by the kerala state pollution control board by order dated2203.2011, which is valid till2003.2014. exhibit-p4: true copy of the no objection .....

Pankajakshan Vs. Sumesh

Court : Kerala

..... petitioner submitted that the courts below have not properly appreciated the nature of cross-examination of pw1 and wrongly applied the presumption under section 139 of the act and convicted the revision petitioner in both the cases which is unsustainable in law.7. the learned public prosecutor supported the concurrent findings of the courts, ..... intimating dishonour and demanding payment of these cheques. he had not paid the amount. so, he had committed the offence punishable under section 138 of the act.4. the complainant filed two separate complaints, one complaint in respect of exts.p1 and p2 cheques and another complaint in respect of exts.p9 and p10 ..... separate private complaints filed by the first respondent herein as complainant against the revision petitioner in both the cases under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act (hereinafter called the act).3. the case of the complainant in both the cases was that the revision petitioner borrowed a sum of `.2 lakhs and agreed to .....

Nobby Philip Vs. Chacko P.Mathew

Court : Kerala

..... . it is submitted that he is ready and willing to appear before the learned magistrate and apply for bail.3. the offence involved is under section 138 of n.i act and it is a bailable offence. accordingly, the crl.m.c is disposed of directing the chief judicial magistrate court, palakkad to consider and pass appropriate orders on the bail ..... is the accused in c.c no. 125/2012 on the file of the chief judicial magistrate court, palakkad. the offence alleged is punishable under section 138 of negotiable instruments act. the crl.m.c is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner under sections 82 and 83 of cr.p.c in c.c no. 125/2012.2 .....

Ajimon Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... the honourable mr.justice p.bhavadasan tuesday,the22d day of october201330th aswina, 1935 crl.a.no. 2005 of 2008 ( ) ------------------------------------- sc2502006 of addl. sessions court/ special court (ndps act cases), thodupuzha. ....... appellant(s):accused ------------------------------------- ajimon, s/o.pappan, kaithamattom house, kochukarunatharuvi, elappara idukki district. by adv. sri.babu s. nair respondent(s): state ..... she revealed the incident to anybody. the said conduct of the accused spoken to by pw1 shows that it could not have been a consensual act. the delay in lodging the complaint very severely agitated by the learned counsel, according to the learned public prosecutor, has no merits. the ..... there was consent or not. as already noticed, there is no suggestion to pw1 to that effect and if normally it was a consensual act, it would have been repeated. the incident in this case is a solitary instance and the testimony of pw1 to the effect that she .....

MartIn Vs. the Government Secretary

Court : Kerala

..... or other appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to take necessary steps to acquire the petitioner's property if necessary as per the provisions of the land acquisition act within a time stipulated by this court. c) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ order or direction commanding the respondents to consider ext.p9 representation within w ..... , if the respondents actually want the property of the petitioner, it is open for w.p.(c)no.22047/2013 3 them to invoke the provisions of the land acquisition act and that the sixth respondent/district collector is the competent authority/acquisitioning officer in this regard.4. heard the learned government pleader as well, who submits that the matter will .....

K.Mari Vs. the Intelligence Inspector

Court : Kerala

..... /m- 2716/2012 dated 17 12/2012 exhibit-p6- true copy of the notice vc/v 222/2013-14 dated 01 07/2013 under section 4 (2) of the kvat act issued by the respondent. respondent(s)' exhibits: nil /true copy/ p.a.to.judge sts a.m. shaffique, j --------------------------------------- w.p.(c). no. 17123 of 201.---------------------------------------- dated this ..... to the aforesaid facts, i am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of as follows:- the competent authority under the kerala value added tax act shall dispose of the adjudication process within a period of ten days in respect of ext. p6 notice under section 47(2) of the kerala value added tax ..... been detained by the respondent authorities. according to the petitioner, it is a motor vehicle registered under the kerala motor vehicles act and does not call for any payment of tax under the kerala value added tax act. the vehicle was brought to the state of kerala by road and was not carried.3. the petitioner is admittedly not .....

Rajesh Francis Vs. Preethi Roslin

Court : Kerala

..... an interpretation, we are satisfied, would bring in uniformity in the provisions relating to declaration of nullity of marriage under the hindu marriage act, special marriage act and the divorce act. such interpretation, we have no hesitation has got to be preferred, consistent with the mandate of article 44 the constitution. 24. we ..... to us, have not considered this question specifically. the possibility of and the opportunity to understand the expression "access" in section 112 of the evidence act in the light of the modern scientific developments has not been considered in earlier binding precedents which understood the said expression "access' to mean mere ..... more meaningful, effective, vibrant and contextually relevant manner to enable the courts to do justice. 53. the presumption under section 112 of the evidence act must certainly be shivering in its shoes. with the advent of science and technology when biological paternity can be ascertained by authentic scientific data, it .....

Rev. Father Joseph Mundassery, Chavakkad Taluk Vs. Michael, Contractor ...

Court : Kerala

..... other hand cheques were issued in discharge of an existing liability. probably, there may be offence under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act for which the complaint should have been filed as prescribed under the negotiable instruments act. the dispute between the petitioner and the first respondent is of a civil nature. even if it is assumed that amounts were due .....

Laila and anr. Vs. Muhammedali

Court : Kerala

Reported in : AIR2009Ker173; 2009(2)KLJ793

..... 1994. but that dissatisfaction/inadequacy is certainly insufficient to dislodge or rebut the conclusive presumption available under section 112 as defined under section 4 of the evidence act. lingering vague doubts in the mind of the courts are not sufficient to dislodge the presumption under section 112. for the reason that it has not been ..... other as proved, and shall not allow evidence to be given for the purpose of disproving it.22. we shall now consider section 112 of the evidence act which enacts the conclusive presumption regarding the legitimacy of a child born during the subsistence of marriage and 280 days thereafter. it reads as follows:112. birth ..... relationship, where matrimonial relationship is not there between the contestants, the dispute can be only about paternity and not legitimacy. section 7(1) of the family courts act does not cover a dispute regarding paternity by itself. it covers only a dispute regarding legitimacy of a child born. it is in that context that both the .....