Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Page 10 of about 24,707 results (3.426 seconds)

Jan 27 2017 (HC)

S. Gunasekari Vs. Mohan, The Inspector of Police, Mangadu Police Stati ...

Court : Chennai

..... deal. 11. from the above facts and circumstances of the case, it is prima facie evident that the accused have dealt with the property belonging to the petitioner by committing acts of impersonation and forgery. in the opinion of this court, the petitioner should be protected from dispossession by any one. therefore, this court directs the respondent police to offer protection ..... (prayer: petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act to punish the respondent, since the respondent did not obey the court order passed by this court in crl.o.p.no.21928 of 2015, dated 1/9/2015.) 1. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2017 (HC)

Ajay Kumar Bishnoi and Another Vs. Debts Recovery Tribunal-I and Other ...

Court : Chennai

..... either impound passport or to put any restriction on travel abroad in exercise of its powers to pass an interim order under section 19(6) of the debts recovery tribunal act. the same view has been taken in sanjeev r.apte vs. i.f.c.i.ltd. [(2009) 3 plr 44], and a.s.mittal vs. p.o., debt recovery ..... the writ jurisdiction of this court. if so, the writ petition is perfectly maintainable. 6. the learned senior counsel for the petitioners would submit that the debts recovery tribunal act does not authorise the tribunal to make the impugned order. in this connection, he relied on the observations of the hon'ble supreme court in v.t.khanzone vs. reserve ..... to be dismissed since the petitioners have approached this court under article 226 of the constitution of india, instead of preferring statutory appeal under section 20 of rddb and fi act, 1993. in this connection, he relied on the judgment in punjab national bank vs. o.c.krishnan and others [2001 supp(1) scr 466]. the hon'ble supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

R. Ranga Babu and Others Vs. AR. Devendran Prop. Singer Sewing Machine

Court : Chennai

..... the demand broke down the landlords faith and expectation and the landlords were thrown pillar to posts by showing the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent) control act, 1960 as amended by act 23 of 1973 as a weapon. a person who is occupying the landlords tenanted portion of the property as tenant must always bear in mind that he/she ..... have proved their bonafide requirement and they have succeeded in their claim u/s 10 (3) (a) (iii) of the tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent) control act 1960 as amended by act 23 of 1973. 11. it is my considered opinion that when the landlord had indicated about the type of business that the propose and pleadings need not necessary ..... rcop.no.1128 of 2009 for the relief of own use and occupation under section 10 (3) (a) (iii) of tamil nadu buildings (lease and rent) control act 1960 as amended by act 23 of 1973 stated that the revision petitioners are the absolute owner of the subject property and the land-lord of the premises bearing old door no. 118 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

Subru @ Subramani Vs. State, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Royakotta ...

Court : Chennai

..... recovered. these accused have no explanation to offer in respect of the possession of these properties. this would give rise to a presumption under section 114 of the indian evidence act that they were the perpetrators of the entire crime. 23. the learned counsel for the appellant would submit that in the fir the names of three accused have been ..... card, which is the primary evidence. since the cellphone with the memory card itself is recovered, there is no question of complying with section 65-b of the indian evidence act. that was analysed by the experts, who have stated that they contained the recording of the rape committed on p.w.1 by these four accused. 21. as a ..... a fine of rs.10,000/- each.7.a1u/s.354 ipcrigorous imprisonment for two years with a fine of rs.5000/-.8.a1u/s.67(a) of information technology act, 2000rigorous imprisonment for two years with a fine of rs.50,000/-. in respect of the other offences, the trial court has acquitted them. challenging the said conviction and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

R. Sivasubramaniyan Vs. R. Periasamy and Others

Court : Chennai

..... of people interested and determination of them is necessary for the disposal of the said suit. (ii) the validity as to explanation (1) to section 59 of the indian succession act, 1925 is raised. (iii) another issue of public importance, alleged is that the state is losing revenue to the extent of few crores of rupees every year through court fees ..... of action against the defendant. 15. while considering the extra ordinary original jurisdiction of the high court, the same is ordained by clause 13 of letters patent act. clause 13 of the letters patent act reads as follows: "and we do further ordain, that the said high court of judicature at fort william at madras shall have power to remove, and to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

M. Karunagaran Vs. The Secretary, Chennai Port Trust, Administrative O ...

Court : Chennai

..... of the benefits meant for sc/sts. the judgment rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in kumari madhuri patil's case is a direction to the states concerned to act swiftly and to put in place an institutional mechanism whereby the 13. the sustainability of the direction issued in kumari madhuri patil's case has come to be doubted later .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

A.T. Jacob and Others Vs. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Sub Inspecto ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... myriad kinds of cases wherein such power should be exercised. ...... 6. where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code of the concerned act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the code or the concerned ..... act, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party. 6. this court perused the order of the judicial magistrate dated 19.08.2009. as per the order, the judicial .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2017 (HC)

G. Punniyamoorthy and Others Vs. Krishnamoorthy (Died) and Others

Court : Chennai

..... .656, this court has held that the respondents / plaintiffs are perfectly justified in having instituted the civil suit, without resorting to the remedy under the provisions of the rent control act, in view of the fact that the appellants have denied the title of the landlord. 24. in view of the catena of decisions referred above, when the appellants 1 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2017 (HC)

Muthukumar @ Vellaian Vs. The Secretary to Government, Home Prohibitio ...

Court : Chennai

..... have been taking the view that generally an affidavit filed by a police officer before the detaining authority to take action under the provisions of the act for detaining illicit distillers, goodas, etc. can only constitute a covering letter for the materials sent to the detaining authority for consideration and for deciding ..... in short, the commissioner of police himself was part of the team of complainants otherwise called as sponsoring authorities. thereafter, he turned the chair and acted in a different capacity as the detaining authority. the sponsoring authority and detaining authority are practically one and the same in all these matters. 43. ..... the sponsoring authority in these five cases submitted separate applications to the commissioner of police, madurai city, to detain the concerned detenus under the tamil nadu act 14 of 1982. the commissioner, while attesting the affidavits of the sponsoring authority, made an endorsement that the deponent solemnly affirmed before him on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2017 (HC)

K. Kannusamy Vs. T. Sumathi

Court : Chennai

..... for the relief in a matrimonial cause should be strictly proved. as observed in the forgoing paragraphs, the standard of proof in case of all proceedings under the act that the court must be satisfied on a preponderance of probability that the ground for relief is proved and normally, the court requires that the evidence of a ..... categorically stated that if we grant divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown, then we shall by judical verdict be adding a clause to section 13 of the act to the effect that irretrievable breakdown of the marriage is also a ground for divorce. in our opinion, this can also be done by the legislature and not ..... respondent had insisted the appellant to hand over his entire salary to the respondent for her maintenance for which the appellant was not amenable. having been aggrieved by the act of the appellant, the respondent had, at the instigation of her father, threatened the appellant not to provide any financial assistance to his parents and also insisted .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //