Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 4 of about 12,635 results (0.100 seconds)

Kanuri Sivaramakrishnaiah Vs. Vemuri Venkata Narahari Rao (Died)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960AP186

..... 66 of the hyderabad contract act and, therefore, the money was recoverable thereunder.there is a very elaborate discussion by jagan-mohan reddy, j., on the subject in the course of which leading cases such as ananda mohan roy v. gour mohan mullick, air 1923 pc 189, hansraj gupta v. dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd ..... referred to above were promulgated by the government of madras in exercise of the powers conferred upon them by the essential supplies (temporary powers) act (act xxiv of 1946) (hereinafter referred to as the act). under clause 8 of the madras foodgrains procurement order, a sale by a landholder of any notified foodgrains (of which paddy is one ..... ., air 1933 pc 63 and mohan manucha v. manzoor ahmed khan, air 1943 pc 29, which furnish instances of the principle enunciated above, were noticed. we are in entire agreement with the reasoning of the full bench. in our judgment, in view of section 65 of the indian contract act, .....

Basvarala Satteyya Vs. Malsoor and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1954CriLJ444

..... the civil procedure code and must be interpreted ejusdem generis. the privy council has in - 'hansraj gupta v. dehra dun mussoorie electric tramway co. ltd.' air 1933 pc 63 (b), observed with respect to the interpretation of the corresponding article in the indian limitation act that 'a series of authorities commencing with - 'bai manektaai v. manekji kavasji 7 bom 213 ..... left to the discretion of the court to say whether arrears for a long period should be collected by the process of the court. the magistrate was to act according to the spirit of the code and enforce the whole or any part of the arrears according to his discretion (vide - 'mi mya v. nga ..... years limitation has been fixed from the date when the right to present an application accrues. the learned advocate for the petitioner contends that since tie limitation act is applicable to both the civil and criminal proceedings, this article should also be made applicable to this application.the simple answer to the objection of the .....

Mohamad Hydar and ors. Vs. the State of Hyderabad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1953CriLJ454

..... behalf of persons who had been convicted and sentenced by the special judge, ahmedabad, who was appointed under the bombay public security measures act, act vi of 1947. this act was impugned as being invalid as it sought to lay down a procedure for the trial of cases different from the established procedure under ..... the high court has powers of superintendence over subordinate courts under article 227 of the constitution of india. under section 107 of the government of india act of 1915, the high court possessed revisional jurisdiction under its power of superintendence over subordinate courts. it did exercise the revisional powers where section 115, ..... civil procedure code or section 439, criminal procedure code did not in terms apply. but under section 224. sub-section (2) of the government of india act, 1935 (the appellate and) revisional powers of the high court had been negatived. that the high court's exercise of the powers of revision & exercising .....

N. Sivaraj Madiga and Others M. Durga Reddy

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the suit is liable to be revised within the well laid out parameters contained in section 115 cpc. unless it is demonstrated that the subordinate court has acted in exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity, the revision is not maintainable. it may be true that instead of preferring the revision under ..... that high courts have not always appreciated that although error in a decision of a subordinate court does not by itself involve that the subordinate court has acted illegally or with material irregularity so as to justify interference in revision under sub-s. (c), nevertheless, if the erroneous decision results in the subordinate ..... petitioner/1st defendant threatened the plaintiff with dire consequences and also threatened to file false criminal case under the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act. it was also the case of the plaintiff, the respondent herein, that he approached the high court and instituted w.p.no.15415 of 2010 when .....

J. Yadagiri Reddy and Others Vs. J. Hemalatha and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

This revision is preferred by the defendant Nos.1, 3 and 4 in the suit, who are the respondents as such in I.A.No.1295 of 2014. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff, while the remaining 3 respondents are defendant Nos.2, 5 and 6. I.A.No.1295 of 2014 is filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking amendment of the plaint. O.S.No.1383 of 2005 is instituted seeking partition and separate possession by metes and bounds in accordance with the shares of the parties and for allotment of the share of the plaintiff to the extent of Ac.5.00 gts in Sy.No.30 part, Sy.No.31 part, Sy.No.58 part and Sy.No.59 part of Dasarlapally Village, Kandukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. The 2nd relief claimed therein was for cancellation of registered sale deeds bearing document Nos.3103 of 2003 and 3104 of 2003 dated 12.12.2003. The 3rd relief is for appointment of an Advocate-commissioner to demarcate the suit schedule properties and to allot the share of the plaintiff and the defendants...

Iragam Reddy Thirupal Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented b ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... there is no supersession of the managing committee of the society. according to counsel for petitioners, when the statute, i.e., the andhra pradesh cooperative societies act, 1964 had not defined the term supersession and a provision therein i.e., section 34 dealt with supersession of the managing committee, the word supersession used in ..... the constitution of india. 67. it is true that in sanjay nagayach (3 supra), the supreme court observed that the registrar of cooperative societies should act independently without external pressure or influence or under the dictation. the said principle cannot be applied to the present case because there is no evidence of any ..... cooperative officer, proddutur informing that corrective measures were taken pursuant to an inspection report under section 52 of the andhra pradesh co-operative societies act, 1964 (for short, the act'). he also intimated about the action taken by 4th respondent-society to the general body of the said society in a meeting held in .....

Chennavelli Narsimulu Vs. Molgari Narayan Goud and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the case. for instance, if the election petition is filed on one ground and subsequently, the elected candidate incurs disqualification under section 22 of the act can be presented before the district court. therefore, this court holds that first respondent does not suffer from any inherent lack of jurisdiction, and therefore, ..... (2008 law suit (ap) 806). 15. an identical issue came up for consideration before the madras high court under the provisions of madras village panchayats act. the division bench of madras high court consisting of the then chief justice mr. k. subba rao and mr. justice bhimasankaram considered the issue in venturu ..... hold the post of sarpanch of mudireddipally village, balanagar mandal, mahabubnagar district, for having more than three children after commencement of the a.p. panchayat raj act, 1994 and consequently to declare the petitioner as elected sarpanch of the mudireddypally village, balanagar mandal, mahaubbnagar district. ? 6. the averments in paragraphs 1 .....

M/s. IVRCL-KBL (JV) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-7 ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... sri t.vinod kumar, learned senior standing counsel for income tax, would place emphasis on the words the person from whose income ?, in section 199(1) of the act, to contend that the said person is the subcontractor and not the petitioner, that would require this court to ignore the subsequent words from whose income the deduction was ..... execution of the work; the government had deducted tax at source, from the bills payable to the petitioner, at 1%/2% as stipulated in section 194c of the act; the petitioner had also deducted tds, at the very same rates, while making payment to the subcontractor; both the petitioner and the sub-contractor had filed their respective ..... used for submitting the bid; all the contract works were to be executed only by the constituent member; the very purpose of forming a joint venture was to act as a connecting link between the irrigation department and the joint-venture constituent, and to handover the contract work received from the former to the latter; the jv .....

Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited and Another Vs. The State of Andhra Pra ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... dutiable or prohibited and imposing penalties. the customs officer does not at that stage accuse the person suspected of infringing the provisions of the sea customs act with the commission of any offence. his primary duty is to prevent smuggling and to recover duties of customs when collecting evidence in respect of smuggling ..... dutiable or prohibited and imposing penalties. the customs officer does not at that stage accuse the person suspected or infringing the provisions of the sea customs act with the commission of any office. his primary duty is to prevent smuggling and to recover duties of customs when collecting evidence in respect of smuggling ..... against a person suspected of infringing the provisions of the sea customs act, he is not accusing the person of any offence punishable at a trial before a magistrate." the above conclusion was reached after consideration of several relevant .....

Anireddy Amrutha Devi @ Amruthamma Vs. Anireddy VAsudha @ Vasudha Redd ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

The order dated 19.11.2015 in I.A.No.880 of 2015 in O.S.No.37 of 2015 passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Nalgonda (FAC Judge, VIII Additional District Judge, Miryalaguda) rejecting the prayer of the petitioner-1st defendant, filed under Order VII Rule 10 and 10A of CPC read with Section 151 C.P.C. seeking returning of the plaint, is challenged before this Court. The respondents 1 and 2 are the plaintiffs filed a suit against the petitioner and respondents 3 and 4 herein, who are defendants 1 to 3 respectively in O.S.No.37 of 2015 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge at Miryalaguda. The averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the I.A.No.880 of 2015 in brief are that the suit is filed by the 1st and 2nd respondents-plaintiffs seeking grant of permanent injunction restraining the petitioner-1st defendant from alienating or conveying or delivering possession or otherwise creating rights in favour of the 3rd parties with respect to the suit schedule prop...