Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: rajasthan Page 86 of about 8,415 results (0.440 seconds)

Oct 18 1984 (HC)

Bhera Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1986Raj113

..... compensation and remanded the case to the land acquisition officer to examine the petitioner's case solely on the point of compensation under the relevant provisions of the act. this finding of the learned single judge was not assailed by the respondents before us.10. no other point survives for our consideration.11. the result ..... annexure r. 1) dt. april 17, 1967, he became functus officio. this was thus necessitiated for us to consider the relevant provisions of the act. section 11 of the act deals with enquiry and award by collector. the collector has been empowered to make an award within the time specified in the section. section 12 provides ..... the collector, sriganganagar. here, it may be stated that the assistant colonisation commissioner, rajasthan canal project, suratgarh, district sriganganagar was also the land acquisition officer under the act who passed the order dt. april, 17, j967 and he was arrayed as respondent 2 in the writ petition. the order (annexure rule 1) was passed by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1951 (HC)

The Mewar Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. the Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1951Raj161

..... shree sukhdeo narain as the industrial tribunal, is as follows :'(we omit the unnecessary portion). in exercise of the powers conferred by section 7, industrial disputes act, 1947 (xiv [14] of 1947) the government of rajasthan is pleased to constitute an industrial tribunal consisting of shri sukhdeo narain, a retired judge of the ..... the industrial court. the decision of the industrial court would, in its turn, be appealable to the appellate tribunal. further, section 87 of the same act, while defining the duty of the industrial court, provides for decision of appeals against orders passed by the registrar, against decisions given by the commissioner of labour ..... try all suits of a civil nature excepting suits of which their cognizance is either expressly or impliedly barred.'the words used in section 9, industrial disputes act, prohibit the calling into question of any appointment of an industrial tribunal 'in any manner.' these words, in our opinion, impliadly bar the jurisdiction of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1987 (HC)

Shyam Sunder Agarwal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1988Raj145; 1988(1)WLN131; 1(1988)WLN(Rev)24

..... largess. we have no hesitation in holding that the allotment of land reserved and set apart for industrial purpose under section 92 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 has to be made in accordance with these rules by adopting a procedure which would give equal opportunity to all eligible intending claimants to be considered ..... the relevant rules for allotment of government land set apart for industrial purpose are framed in exercise of the powers conferred by section 100 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 and these rules are called the rajasthan land revenue (industrial areas allotment) rules, 1959. rule 1a defines 'industrial area' to mean an area of ..... relevant statutory provisions relating to allotment of government land in such a situation. the statutory provisions are only a few. section 92 of the rajasthan land revenue act, 1956 empowers the collector, subject to the general orders of the state government, to set apart land for any special purpose or for any public or municipal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 1978 (HC)

Lalchand Vs. Sant Ram

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1979Raj140; 1978(11)WLN133

..... gazette vide notification dated oct. 29, 1975 and which was subsequently replaced by the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) (amendment) act, 1976 (amending act no. 14 of 1976). the amended provisions of sub-section (4) of section 13, which are relevant for the purposes of this revision petition, are ..... hiralal's case. but the provisions under consideration in the calcutta case were entirely different. sub-section (2b) of section 17 of the calcutta rent act, which was under consideration before their lordships of the calcutta high court, specifically provided that no application for extension of time for deposit or payment of ..... his order dated may 28, 1977 maintained the order passed by the trial court. hence this revision application,2. sub-section (4) of section 13 of the act was substituted by the rajasthan premises (control of rent and eviction) (amendment) ordinance, 1975 (rajasthan ordinance no. 26 of 1975) which was published in the rajasthan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 1963 (HC)

Dhannalal and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1964Raj106

..... of a particular activity by another body. according to this view also if the delegation amounts to self-effacement where the principal directs the delegate to act entirely in its discretion without indicating the policy such delegation alone is bad.judged from this standard, in our opinion, section 6-a merely assigns the ..... its power of legislation. (3) it cannot abdicate its legislatiye functions, and therefore while entrusting power to an outside agency, it must see that such agency acts as a subordinate authority and does not become a parallel legislature. (4) the doctrine of separation of powers and the judicial interpretation it has received in america ..... .7. before we examine the various contentions it will be perhaps useful to recall the legal provisions touching the subject. the rajasthan entertainment tax act, 1957 (hereinafter called the act) provided for the leyy by the state government of a tax in respect of admission to theatres, cinemas and other places of public entertainment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1966 (HC)

Chauthmal Vs. the State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1967Raj179

..... notification it must override the general provision relating to the execution of contracts on behalf of the municipal boards contained in section 80 (7) of the rajasthan municipalities act.21. section 92 (2) divides properties managed and controlled by the board into two classes (i) properties which vest in and belong to the board and ( ..... the sale was not completed as the approval of the collector was not taken as required under the proviso to section 80 (1) of the rajasthan municipalities act. i shall deal with this question later. even if the sale was not completed the impugned order of the state government is without jurisdiction as the conditions ..... writ of certiorari was filed on the ground that the decision of the lower court was without jurisdiction for the reason that the chairman of the appellate authority acted as such without being appointed in accordance with law and the constitution of the tribunal, therefore, was illegal. a preliminary objection was raised by the opposite .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1973 (HC)

Samarathmal and ors. Vs. Jugaldas and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1974Raj104; 1973()WLN813

..... that the state government may issue under section 43 (1) (iv) as that power automatically vests in the transport authority by section 63 (1) of the act. we, however, need not go into this controversy as in our opinion the petitioners are disentitled to get relief in the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction on account of ..... only be conveniently possible as suggested in the aforesaid supreme court authority under section 43 (1) (in). tyagi, j. further after examining the scheme of the act and considering the provisions of section 63 (3) proviso dispensing with the compliance of the provisions of section 57 for granting the counter-signature on permits reached the ..... of the constitution of india and challenged the impugned resolution inter alia on the ground (i) that a scheme under section 68-c of the motor vehicles act for kota-ravat bhata route having been published no counter-signatures could be granted to samrathmal on neemuch-kota route as it completely covered the route under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1993 (HC)

Rashid Mohd. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj167b; 1994(1)WLC626; 1993WLN(UC)512

..... post or the commercial taxes officer of the area where he ordinarily resides or carries on any business or provides any service, and the provisions of the rajasthan sales tax act, 1954 (act no. 29 of 1954) as applicable to a registered dealer or casual trader shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to such dealer or, as the case may be, such person ..... as may be notified by the state government from time to time but not exceeding the rates notified for motor vehicles under section 5 of the rajasthan sales tax act, 1954 (rajasthan act 29 of 1954) or fifteen per cent of the purchase value of a motor vehicle, whichever is less: provided that no tax shall be levied and collected in ..... vehicles which are purchased outside the state and brought in the state of rajasthan for use or sale therein and are liable to be registered under the motor vehicles act, 1939 (central act 4 of 1939). no tax has been levied on such of the motor vehicles which are registered in any other state of union territory for a period of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1981 (HC)

Praja Sahkari Udyog Bharatpur Ltd. Vs. Joint Registrar, Co-operative S ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj205; 1981()WLN650

..... h.c. kumar to escape from the hold of joint registrar, co-operative societies, bharatpur who is the only competent authority under the rajasthan co-operative societies act to take action against the petitioner society. while deciding the contempt application no. 32/79 filed by the petitioner-society, i have already decided that vide ..... appeal no- 67/74 pending against the decision of the learned single judge. the society was registered as an industrial society under the rajasthan co-operative societies act, 1965 and it was registered subject to the conditions laid down in the bye-laws as registered with the certificate of registration. the bye-laws registered ..... of co-operative societies, rajasthan vide registry receipt receipt no. 678, dated 7-12-1971 for seeking amendment for the adoption of uttar pradesh co-operative societies act, 1965 and rules made thereunder on the ground that the proposed principal place of business of the petitioner stands shifted from bharatpur to launi (u. p.). .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 22 1971 (HC)

Lal Singh and ors. Vs. Tejsingh and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1972Raj137; 1971(4)WLN674

..... substantially one for cancellation of the sale-deed dated 18-7-57 court-fee shall be computed under section 33(1)(a) of the rajasthan court-fees and suits valuation act on the value of the property for which the sale-deed was executed namely rs. 24,000/. the valuation for purposes of jurisdiction will be the same. the suit is ..... 38(1)(a) of the rajasthan court-fees and suits valuation act, which runs as follows:--'38. suits for cancellation of decrees etc.-- (1) in a suit for cancellation of a decree for money or other property having a money value, or ..... on appeal. he held that the suit was one for declaration and possession and court-fee was payable under section 24(a) of the rajasthan court-fees and suits valuation act.3. on behalf of the applicants it is contended that the suit is substantially one for the cancellation of the sale-deed and that court-fee is payable under section .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //