Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: mumbai Page 19 of about 28,972 results (0.392 seconds)

May 27 1992 (TRI)

Paras V. Doshi Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1992)42ITD749(Mum.)

..... tax liabilities to the extent they stood ascertained and finalised ceased to be mere provisions. according to him, an ascertained liability would not be a provision even under the companies act in the context of part-ill of schedule vi because the very term 'provision' envisages the unquantified and unascertained element. he submitted that when the tax liabilities for and upto ..... 1. under the wealth-tax act, these 25 appeals by the assessees involve common issues. because the assesses are of the same group, all these appeals were heard together. therefore, they are disposed off by a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 1949 (PC)

Habib Ahmed Rizvi Vs. the Crown

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1950CriLJ817

..... commissioner in his executive capacity and is an administrative and not a judicial order. we respectfully agree with the following observations in sandal singh v. dist. mag. & supdt., dehra dun : air1934all148 . 'the high court would have no power to interfere with orders passed by a district magistrate in his executive capacity.' we may also refer to the oases ..... opinion this letter did not supersede b, 19 which was in born in february 1949. the order of the deputy commissioner is not warranted by section 7 of the act and the relevant permit system rules. we have no power, however, to set aside the order for the reasons stated in the following paragraphs.16. section 491, criminal ..... order. * * * *the question is whether this order is illegal. we may point out that the reference to the ordinance is wrong as it had been repealed by act xxiii [23] of 1949.7. here we may give a short account of the law regulating the control of admission into india of persons from pakistan. the first ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2002 (TRI)

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus., Nhava Sheva

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (2002)LC113Tri(Mum.)bai

..... are used for post drilling process. they were therefore not required for oil exploration or exploitation. it sought for the opinion of the indian institute of petroleum, dehra dun (for short iip), as to whether these goods could be considered to be oilfield chemicals and received their opinion that they could not be relying upon this ..... drilling and production is thus not supported by any evidence or technical authority. as against this the definition of the term 'oilfield' in the oilfields (regulation and development) act, 1948 reads as follows : "'oilfield' means any area where any operation for the purpose of obtaining natural gas and petroleum, crude oil, refined oil, partially refined ..... oil and any of the products of petroleum in a liquid or solid state, is to be or is being carried on." 12. no doubt that act is enacted for a different purpose and therefore the definition contained in it would not be applicable to other statutes. however, we think a consideration of this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2014 (HC)

National Project Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... the clearance of the forest. the collector of dehra dun by the impugned order held that the provisions of the act were applicable to the land. the company could not, therefore, take permission under the u.p. act of 1958 from the prescribed authority nor could any further act for fully implementing the housing scheme be done. ..... the purpose for which the corporation is established, the corporation will be dissolved because the raison d'etre is gone. we, therefore, hold that the act is a valid piece of legislation. 5. s.g.aney, learned senior counsel has submitted that the respondent/midc seeking enforcement of certain clauses in the ..... 11.9.2013 passed by the regional officer of respondent no.2/maharashtra industrial development corporation, a body constituted under the provisions of the maharashtra industrial development corporation act, 1961 ( hereinafter referred to as midc), cancelling allotment of plot no.33a/1, admeasuring 55,620 sq. meters situated in midc, industrial area, hingna under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 1938 (PC)

Rajlakshmi Dassi Vs. Bholanath Sen

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1938)40BOMLR1241

..... it is clear that the decree excluded the title of both the widow and the reversionary heirs. the board also based their decision on article 129 of the indian limitation act, 1871, but that part of the decision is not material for present purposes. in the course of the judgment, which was delivered by sir john edge, the judgment of macpherson ..... the case out of the ruling laid down in the shivagunga case, which is quoted above. article 141 of the indian limitation act of 1877 had first appeared in a more limited form in article 142 of the act of 1871, being then confined to the death of a widow. the judgment of the board, delivered by sir richard couch, after ..... referring to these changes, states in reference to article 141 of the act of 1877 (p. 192),:-the words 'entitled to the possession of immoveable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 2014 (HC)

Indirabai Narayan Bivalkar, Deceased Through her L.Rs. and Others Vs. ...

Court : Mumbai

..... right, privilege, perquisite or office and entered as class i, ii, iii, iv or v in the records kept under the rules made under the pensions act, 1871.... section 4: abolition of personal inams and rights in respect of such inams: notwithstanding anything contained in any usage, settlement, grant, sanad or order or a ..... of petitioner's contention. the respondents failed to discharge their burden as they claim that the land vested in the government under the inam abolition act and other act also but failed to prove the same except by raising frivolous pleas. the order so passed by the authorities consistently, on the contrary, supports ..... raising the same earlier are unacceptable and contrary to the record, rightly admitted the ownership/title of the petitioners. 54. the object and purpose of abolition act are completely overlooked by the respondents, only for these petitions, not earlier, when they never raised such contentions earlier by invoking appropriate proceedings and/or objections. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2015 (HC)

Sumit and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... in the complaint petition with regard to any demand for dowry by the appellants; or of any ill-treatment of the respondent by the appellants or commission of any act in connection with any such demand which could amount to `cruelty' within the meaning of section 498a, indian penal code. shri sharan has also urged that no where ..... prima facie shows that, ingredients of sections 498-a, 406, 323, 504, 506 r/w. 34 of ip code and under sections 3 and 4 of dowry prohibition act is made out. it is submitted that, the alleged offence is committed by the accused either at thane district or at deulgaon raja in buldhana district. therefore, the ..... taken at its face value, no offence is constituted against the petitioners. it is submitted that, omnibus allegations are made in the fir. there are no any specific overt acts attributed qua each of the petitioners. the petitioner nos. 8 and 9 are old aged persons, and by no stretch of imagination, the allegations against said petitioners are sustainable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2015 (HC)

Satish Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through Superintendent of Police a ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... a particular case; (b) registered medical practitioner ? means a medical practitioner who possess any medical qualification as defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the indian medical council act, 1956 (102 of 1956) and whose name has been entered in a state medical register. 54. examination of arrested person by medical officer.- (1) when any person is arrested ..... in custody, before j.m.f.c., ambad. the burden was on respondent no. 2 to explain the circumstances. there is specific allegations that respondent no. 2 was acting under the influence of father of respondent no. 5. 21. the affidavit of respondent no. 2 and the record show that respondent no. 2 had the intention to effect ..... government and courts were not followed when the aforesaid actions were taken by respondent no. 2. 11. it is the case of petitioner that by doing the aforesaid acts, respondent no. 2 had kept the petitioner in custody for more than 56 hours and if the period of 24 hours is deducted, the petitioner was kept in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2013 (HC)

Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Mumbai Internationa ...

Court : Mumbai

..... agreement and it is this kind of situation that chlorocontrols contemplates. we have already noted above the material distinction between sections 45 and 8 of the arbitration act and that chlorocontrols was not, strictosensu, concerned with an interpretation of section 8. in the present case, the situation is very different. to put it briefly ..... case was wholly untenable. this is how he placed his response: (a) hdils petition, as laid, is not maintainable under section 9 of the arbitration act. it seeks reliefs beyond the slum rehabilitation contract and against respondents who are not parties to that contract. hdils case rests on the supposition that the slum ..... order dated 23rd august 2013 passed by a learned single judge of this court dismissing the appellants petition under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( the arbitration act ). by consent, we took up the matter for final disposal at the stage of admission. we heard learned counsel for the appearing parties at .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 10 2015 (HC)

Ranjana Vishwanath Shahane Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... be achieved by statutorily mandating the courts to become active seekers of truth. to enable the courts to ward off unjustified interference in their working, those who indulge in immoral acts like perjury, prevarication and motivated falsehood, must be appropriately dealt with. the parties must state forthwith sufficient factual details to the extent that it reduces the ability to put forward .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //