Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: mumbai Page 13 of about 28,972 results (0.632 seconds)

Maha Prasad Singh Vs. Ramani Mohan Singh

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1914)16BOMLR824

..... the present case.25. the critical question in this suit is as to whether clause 5 excludes from the jurisdiction of courts established under the bengal singh civil courts act, 1871, suits relating to land where the value of the matter in dispute is more than rs. 1,000. their lordships are of opinion that to this question only ..... it is evident that the government by this section left it to the lieutenant-governor of bengal to decide in future whether courts established under the bengal civil courts act, 1871, should retain jurisdiction within the sonthal parganas, it had already made up its mind that such should not be the case with suits relating to lands pending the ..... regulation, to alter the effect of the notification of august 19th, 1867, which applied to them the civil procedure code of 1859 as amended in 1861. act vi of 1871 is known as the bengal civil courts act, 1871. it is not in the scheduled list. but it was passed at a date when the code of civil procedure, 1859, as amended by .....

Naranbhai Chhaganbhai Vs. Motibhai Ishwarbhai

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1955Bom406; (1955)57BOMLR509

..... date of the promissory note and not from the date of the demand. the plaintiff's suit was filed actually in april 1877 when act of 1859 had been repealed and act of 1871 was in force. under the latter act limitation began to run only when a demand was made. it was held that the suit regarded as a suit upon a promissory ..... note was barred by time.it is true that the act of 1871 was in force when the suit was filed, and it was that act which had to be applied when considering the question whethe the suit was barred or not. but inasmuch as the plaintiff's suit ..... into force.6a. now, it is quite true that in the act of 1877 it was provided by section 2 that nothing contained in the acts of 1871 and 1877 should be taken to revive arty right to sue barred, under the act of 1871 or under any enactment repealed by the act of 1871. acts of 1859 and 1877 appear to have made express provision, in the .....

Smt. Phulwari Jagdambaprasad Pathak Vs. Shri R.H. Mendonca, Commission ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (2000)102BOMLR439

..... wherein the word 'offence' has been defined thus:-'offence' means any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force and includes any act in respect of which a complaint may be made under section 20 of the cattle trespass act, 1871 (1 of 1871)to fortify his submission that the expression 'any of the offences' used ..... in section 2(b - i) of the m.p.d.a. act, would not include in - camera statement, mr. chitnis placed reliance on the following decisions of the ..... said writ petition was preferred by the petitioner vidyadhar verma challenging the preventive detention of his son one mahesh verma as a dangerous person under the m.p.d.a. act. on behalf of the petitioner, the said petition was argued by mr. chitnis, learned counsel for the petitioner in the present petition. in the said writ petition .....

The Province of Bombay Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1954Bom1; (1953)55BOMLR670; ILR1953Bom1081

..... the sense that this court isbound ever after to decide that a claim fortwelve years' arrears is good. that decisionwas passed when either act 14 of 1859 or act 9of 1871 applied to the claim. the present suit was brought after act 15 of 1877 came into force, and it, therefore, must be applied.'clearly, therefore, the decision was based on the application of ..... law.it was true that the act had changed, but art. 131 of act 9 of 1871 which must have been applied was reproduced in the act of 1817 in the same words; there is nothing whatsoever to show that an article more special than art. 131 of ..... judgment. he says that the suit which came up before their lordships had to be decided under the limitation act, 1877, whereas the prior suit which had been filed by the plaintiff was governed either by act 14 of 1859 or act 9' of 1871. now, this is quite true; but it does not appear to me that there had been any change of .....

Shankerappa Irappa Vs. Kotrappa Channappa

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1906)8BOMLR516

..... support of that position. the case of nidhi lal v. mazhar husain, cited for appellant, decided that the object of sections 19 and 20 of the bengal civil courts' act, 1871, was to create in the district judge, subordinate judge and munsiff concurrent jurisdiction upto rs. 1,000.12. on turning to the ..... act vi of 1871, the district judge, subordinate judge and munsiff would have concurrent jurisdiction in respect of all suits not exceeding ..... value of the subject-matter in dispute does not exceed rs. 1,000.14. the civil procedure code referred to was act viii of 1859 and section 15 of the present code corresponds with the section 6, mentioned in section 19 of act vi of 1871.15. the result was that in the absence of any assignment of particular jurisdiction under section 18 of .....

Govind Balkrishna and ors. Vs. Ramchandra Rajaram and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1952Bom395; (1952)54BOMLR263; ILR1952Bom621

..... suit house. they referred to the previous enactments in regard to limitation, namely, act xiv of 1859, the limitation act of 1871 and the act of 1877, and referred lastly to the present provision in the act of 1908. in their lordships' opinion, the effect of the acts of 1871 and 1877 was not to except from the rule laid down in the ' ..... the deceased testator had devised the whole residue of his estate to trustees for dharam. the testator had left him surviving two widows, one of whom died in 1871 and the other in 1888. the heir of the deceased testator filed a suit after the death of the second widow for a declaration that the devise to ..... defendant becomes adverse to the plaintiff, is not applicable where the suit is otherwise specially provided for.'their lordships in terms negatived the contention that article 144, limitation act was applicable to the facts of that case. article 141 was the one which specially provided for a suit filed by a hindu entitled to possession of immovable .....

Lalubhai Surchand Vs. Bai Amrit and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1878)ILR2Bom299

..... footing, through established usage, from the other two contracts with which the ancient authorities link it.49. we have seen that, under section 50 of the registration act viii of 1871, a registered document 'takes effect' against an unregistered one relating to the same property. by section 48 it 'takes effect' against an oral agreement 'unless ..... was afterwards ruled that an unregistered and even an oral title completed by possession could not be displaced by a subsequent registered title without possession. in act viii of 1871 a registered document still takes effect against an unregistered one per se, but the rulings of the courts are adopted in the sense that an oral ..... section 48, to registered contracts over oral ones, was meant to refer--could refer practically--only to prior oral contracts, and that the provision in act viii of 1871, section 48, is to be referred to the same point of time. all registered instruments take effect against oral agreements except where these have been .....

State Bank of India and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through the S ...

Court : Mumbai

..... , 1877 (3 of 1877), or this act. 111 a bare perusal of section 50 would also reveal that ..... on or before 30th september, 2013 such instrument which are executed prior to the commencement of the date of maharashtra tax law (levy and amendment) act 2013 (maharashtra act viii of 2013) in which proper stamp duty is not paid and to forward it to the collector for recovery and on failure to do so ..... act, 1866 (xx of 186b), was in force in the place and at the time in and at which such unregistered document was executed unregistered means not registered according to such act, and, where the document is executed after the first day of july 1871, not registered under the indian registration act, 1871. (8 of 1871), or the indian registration act .....

Emperor Vs. Ramnath Mahabir

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR111

..... in evidence the statement made by the accused ramath before the coroner on september 25, 1925, when the coroner was holding an inquest under the coroner's act, 1871, over the body of the deceased surajballi.2. mr. pendse, for the accused, objects that this statement is inadmissible. he mainly relies upon section 164 of ..... certain statements made in the particular circumstances contemplated by this section 164. it cannot override the general provisions of section 29 of the indian evidence act, except where these circumstances bring the section into operation. section 164 does not apply in this particular ease, because under section 1 of the criminal procedure code ..... him, is immaterial, that a confession is not inadmissible on account of such an omission is expressly provided for by section 29 of the indian evidence act. mr. pendse referred to section 164 of the criminal procedure code as containing a general principle to the contrary. but that is a special enactment applying only to .....

HusseIn Khan Mohamed Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR262

..... definition and takes account of a person detained in prison under the provisions of chapter viii of the code of criminal procedure, 1882, or under the prisons act, 1871. the point that he wants to emphasise by referring to these two definitions is that it is not enough that a person is involved in some criminality or ..... or court-martial, and includes a person detained in prison under the provisions of chap. viii of the code of criminal procedure, 1882, or under the prisons act, 1871. in order that a person should be described as a criminal prisoner, it should be possible to point out that he is committed to the custody under a ..... judgment of conviction is pronounced by a competent criminal court, the security prisoner is to be forthwith treated as a convicted criminal prisoner within the meaning of the prisons act, 1894. according to him, the present petitioner satisfied all the conditions of this clause. initially under the two criminal cases, he had undergone the entire sentence. .....