Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: karnataka dharwad Page 17 of about 721 results (0.099 seconds)

Mar 04 2020 (HC)

Basavaraj S/o Kanteppa Pujar Vs. Shankar S/o Malkappa Nidagundi

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... did come to the bank in a drunken manner and he further remained absent from 24.8.2012 unauthorizedly and further on account of bp and his mental disturbance, he acted in such a manner and should be pardoned for having committed illegal actions of offences and take him again into service. believing the words of the accused persons, he gave .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Ramagouda Narasagouda Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

M/s.sarovara Wines Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Shamiulla Shadaguppi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Shri.raghaendra S/o Devanna @ Devendra Kamblekar Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Manjunath S/o Ramayya Ilager Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Nagaraj D Jannu Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

M/s.lotus Wine Shop Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

M/s.gayatri Liquor Shop, Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Krishnaji Ramanna Kalal Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. the impugned notification dated 29.03.2016 is issued recommending four places in each assembly constituency for granting retail licenses in favour ..... license in favour of government owned or controlled company without reference to or applicability of rule 12(3) of the rules. section 71(2)(e) of the act provides for regulating the grant of a number of licenses. the grant of license to the government owned/ controlled company without reference to the population in any local ..... and or within the scope of that authority, it fails to see 38 how the rule can be challenged on the ground lack of legislative competence. if the act is valid, so are the rules. the tests of arbitrary action which applies to administrative action do not necessarily apply to delegated legislation. in order that delegated legislation .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //