Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: himachal pradesh Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 143 results (0.871 seconds)

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Pawan Kumar

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC167

..... died, in the facts and the circumstances of the case, which we are going to discuss hereinbelow, gives rise to a statutory presumption under section 114 of the indian evidence act, that either he himself administered the poison to the deceased or she took the poison to end her life on account of his having harassed her and having treated her ..... -b says that dowry for the purpose of the said sub-section (1) shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961. in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961, dowry has been defined to mean-any property or valuable security given or agreed to be given either directly or indirectly-(a) by one party .....

Kasam Deen Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007CriLJ3974,2007(2)ShimLC221

..... challaned in the court of special judge, who after complying with the requirement of section 207, code of criminal procedure, charged him with the offence, under section 20 of the act, and on his pleading not guilty put him on trial. on the conclusion of the trial, appellant was held guilty and therefore, convicted and sentenced, as aforesaid.4. learned counsel ..... appeal is directed against the judgment of special judge, whereby the appellant has been convicted of an offence, under section 20(b) of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act (hereinafter called the act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of rs. 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of .....

Goel Bus Service Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2007HP101

..... criteria for giving different treatment to different roads. the respondents are alleged to have done the same exercise to levy tax under the passengers and goods taxation act, 1955, to over reach the judgment in 'nurpur bus operators union's' case supra.18. contra the case of the respondents have been that the imposition ..... in advance for each route 7th of each commencing month and any violation is dealt with strictly in accordance with the provision of himachal pradesh motors vehicles taxation act, 1972. copy of which is enclosed for ready reference.director transport. hp, shimla-171004.copy.-1. the commissioner-cum-secretary (transport) to the government of ..... himachal pradesh, the special road tax shall become chargeable, on such entry in the specified manner.explanation:for the purpose of special road tax levied under this act, transport vehicles shall include non-transport vehicles when used as transport vehicles by the owner.3-b. establishment of fund for, the payment of ex-gratia .....

Soffimat S.A. and anr. Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... it also bid for setting up heps at bharmour (45 mw) and harsar (60 mw). the petitioner no. 2 m/s. sobra power ltd. a company registered under the companies act having its registered office at chandigarh is stated to be a subsidiary of petitioner no. 1. 3. on 21st june, 2000, memorandum of understandings (mous) were entered into between the .....

Kanshi Ram and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008CriLJ884

..... now well settled that for constituting an offence under section 307 of the indian penal code, it is sufficient in law, if there is present, intent occupied with some overt act in execution thereof. the ingredients of the offence under section 307 of the indian penal code are fully established, in this case, the presence is admitted by the convict appellants ..... that in furtherance of the common intention; the appellants with preparation trespassed into the shop and house and they had the knowledge, intention and knew the circumstances under which they acted with a view to cause the death of dinesh. the prosecution has been able to prove the actus reus and the mens rea.17. the learned trial court has rightly .....

Kamla Devi and ors. Vs. Surindra and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(1)ShimLC218

..... 1980-81 are erroneous, their status was changed from manager/mohatmim to hissadar without any basis.7. on coming into force of the himachal pradesh common lands (vesting and utilization) act, 1974 shamlat lands had vested in the state except the lands used or reserved for village community. the trust or its property did not vest in the state nor the ..... for his own use. udham singh never created a charitable trust of suit property nor did he ever dedicate the same to the public. the widow of udham singh never acted as manager or trustee of the alleged charitable trust. the entries in revenue record as 'rafai-am' are wrong. smt. balwant devi, daughter of smt. bijjarwal, was mother of ..... of the endowment.it has been further held that even if a part of dharamshah was used by the general public for long time but continuance of such a benevolent acts/chanty would not lead to creation of a trust. the plaintiffs in the present case have failed to prove the tests laid down by the apex court to prove .....

Chamera Hydro Electric Project Vs. Ganga Ram and ors. and Gian Chand a ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(3)ShimLC243

..... -0 gair mumkin rs. 600/-gharat burd.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------4. the land owners were aggrieved by the compensation awarded by the collector, therefore, they preferred reference petitions under section 18 of the act. the learned district judge enhanced the compensation as follows:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------sr. no. & title of the amount of awarded by net amountno. petition compensation the court of enhancedawarded by compensationthe collector ..... reference made by collector. therefore, appellant cannot be permitted to question that the reference petitions were time barred. the applications filed by land owners under section 18 of the act for making reference to the district judge were validly referred by the collector and the finding recorded by learned district judge on issue no. 2 regarding limitation in the impugned .....

Jai Kumar Muni Chand Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(HP)417,[2008]303ITR133(HP)

..... the sales-tax which, at the relevant time, was 10 per cent. the rate of sales-tax was enhanced by a retrospective amendment to the h.p. general sales-tax act w.e.f. 1st feb., 1979. the assessee challenged the amendment before the high court. his writ petition was dismissed on 23rd april, 1980. thereafter the assessee filed special leave .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. H.P. Agro Industries

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(HP)183,[2008]301ITR118(HP)

..... have been sufficient for the said purpose., the decisions cited by dr. pal contemplate situations where specific provision had been made in sections 30 to 36 of the act and it was felt that what had been specifically provided therein could not be excluded under section 37. the clarification introduced by way of sub-section (5) to ..... the expression 'residential accommodation including any accommodation in the nature of a guest house' used in sub-sections (3), (4) and (5) of section 37 of the act. while the two expressions can be similarly interpreted, a distinction has been sought to be introduced for the purposes of section 37 by specifying the nature of building to be ..... of the first appellate authority in directing the ao not to reduce the amount of subsidy to arrive at the actual cost of assets under section 43(1) of the it act, 1961, for allowing depreciation?3. the first question is squarely covered by a judgment of the apex court in britannia industries ltd. v. cit and anr. : [2005] .....

Sonu Kumar and Bal Krishan Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2007(2)ShimLC158

..... read with sections 34, 323 read with sections 34, 376(g) of the indian penal code and section 3(x) of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes (prevention of atrocities) act, because the prosecutrix was alleged to belong to a scheduled caste. all the accused pleaded not guilty to the charge. the trial court then proceeded to try the case and .....