Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dehra dun act 1871 Court: chennai Page 8 of about 24,675 results (0.183 seconds)

Khaji Muhammad HussaIn Sahib Vs. the Masjiday Mahmood Jamait Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1940)2MLJ436

..... an exclusively religious purpose is a charitable purpose and whether a society formed for such a purpose would be a charitable society within the meaning of the act because in our opinion where a society is formed for certain purposes whose paramount object is charitable, the fact that some of the purposes may not ..... relief sought in the plaint. he formulated his contention thus : (1) the society was a religious society and therefore incapable of incorporation under the societies registration act as only charitable societies could be incorporated thereunder; and (2) even if the society was a validly incorporated society it could not acquire by prescription the office ..... , 1918. in view of this common danger everybody including the defendant conceived the idea of forming a society and getting it registered under the societies registration act and vesting the management of the mosque in a governing body of the society. accordingly a society was formed and registered under the name and style of .....

Muthu Chettiar Vs. Muhammad HussaIn and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 55Ind.Cas.763

..... words joint mortgagors. we think that no significance should be attached to this omission, as the expression 'co-contractors' is capable of including joint mortgagors. the indian act is a general one applicable to simple debts and real debts as well. whatever may have been the justification for making a difference between the two classes of cases ..... in england, by section 21 of the indian limitation act the legislature apparently intends to abrogate such distinction in this country. there is no reason, on principle, why there should be a distinction between the case of ..... ordinarily impose a liability on the other by anything done by him. the general principle being that a suit should be dismissed if barred by limitation, any act which avoids this result must be charged against the party responsible for it and not against the other in whose favour the law has created a right to .....

Fazullah Sheriff Vs. Abdul Wahab Khan and Six ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1996(1)CTC180

..... compensation as a condition precedent for delivery and this petition is not maintainable. the executing court, by order dated 18.11.1985, has dismissed e.a. no. 1871 of 1980 filed by the petitioner herein after considering the contentions of the parties.4. the main contention of the counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner remained ..... heard both the counsel. of course, the point raised by the petitioners counsel is an appreciable one. when a suit for ejectment is filed, section 4 of the act provides that in a suit for ejectment against a tenant in which the landlord succeeds, the courts shall ascertain the amount of compensation, if any, payable under section ..... stating that the petitioner herein never filed any petition before the court claiming compensation for the superstructure. he also never filed any petition under section 9 of the act to enforce his right to purchase the land. they allowed the suit to be decreed ex-parte in 1973. in the e.p. also without claiming any .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Standard Triumph Motor Co. Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1979]119ITR572(Mad)

..... the income-tax officer shall have the right to be heard either in person or by a representative.'...... he has referred us to certain other sections of the act where, according to him, the determination is also subjective,...... by what we mustadmit is a very adroit and plausible piecing together of some of these sections, ..... received, and under that system, book profits are assessed as liable to tax......... mr. kolah pressed into service the argument based on section 13 of the act that the mercantile system of accounting regularly adopted by the assessee was obligatory on the income-tax authorities for computation of his income. while agreeing generally with that ..... liable to tax all income, profits or gains from whatever source derived, accruing or arising or received in british india or deemed under the provisions of the act to accrue, arise or to be received in british india. the question that arose for the determination of the courts was whether, under the mercantile system, profits .....

The Secretary, Board of Revenue, Income Tax Vs. the Madras Export Comp ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1924Mad63

..... as arbitrators. but i think it is not going too far to say that that decision has been treated as being based on the view that the land acquisition act made the chief court arbitrators, and no more. that view appears to have been adopted by lord macnaughten himself in the special officer, salsette building sites v. dasabhai ..... to empower the judges to sit as arbitrators and without appeal, but it would require plain language to impose such duties and there is nothing in the income tax act, to indicate any such intention. whether in this case we are sitting in our original jurisdiction, or in bur appellate jurisdiction as was held in birendra kishore manikya ..... the decision of the privy council in rangoon botatoung co. ltd. v. the collector, rangoon [1912] 40 cal. 21 was against this view. under the land acquisition act, i of 1894 where lands are taken over for public purposes, the collector is appointed arbitrator between the government and the parties. under section 18, he may be required .....

K.S. Suresh Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)200CTR(Mad)392

..... proceedings even dated march 21, 2005, concluded that the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2000-01 have been validly reopened under section 147 of the act and decided to proceed further, which necessitated the petitioners to prefer the above writ petitions.17. mr. janarthana raja, learned counsel for the petitioners, specifically ..... letter dated november 29, 2004, the respondent by letter dated december 7, 2004, furnished the reasons for reopening the assessment under section 147 of the act. in response to the reasons furnished by the respondent for reopening the assessment referred to above, the petitioners submitted their objections on december 27, 2004, ..... . 10607, 10628 and 10631 of 2005, challenging the consequential proceedings of provisional attachment even dated november 25, 2004, issued under section 281b of the act are the same and identical, arising under similar facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petitions are heard and disposed of jointly at the admission .....

M. Munusamy Vs. Sri Vedantha Desikar Devasthanam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ309

..... 4 standing on the land belonging to the 1st defendant belongs to the plaintiff and the plaintiff is entitled to the protection under the madras city tenants protection act.(b) directing the 2nd defendant to deliver vacant possession of the residential portion in his occupation and also direct the 2nd defendant and the 3rd and 4th defendants ..... government order.15. before the institution of the suit, first defendant filed another suit for declaration that he is a tenant under the madras city tenants protection act. he also wanted eviction of defendants 2 to 4 therein. third defendant herein is the third defendant in that suit also. plaintiff herein was made a party ..... and is paying consumption charges. since he has put up the super-structure, he is entitled to the protection under section 9 of the madras city tenants protection act, and is entitled to purchase the property. he also prayed for dismissal of the suit.5. third defendant, appellant herein, in his written statement, contended that .....

Padmini Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu and Others

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2964

..... order passed in w.p. no. 10924 of 1992. the writ petition is directed against the notification under s. 3(1) of the commissions of inquiry act, 1952 (central act 60 of 1952) with the following terms of reference, viz., '(i) to inquire into the allegation of death of thiru nandagopal, son of thiru ramasamy in ..... collusion with the station house officer (the head of the police station). the supreme court has in that judgment said that a state is liable for tortuous acts of its employees and that for police atrocities, the state should pay compensation to the victims. pending adjudication of damages, therefore, interim compensation ex debito justitiae ..... any person in any court, the public prosecutor or assistant public prosecutor in charge of the case shall conduct the prosecution, and the pleader so instructed shall act therein under the directions of the public prosecutor or assistant public prosecutor, and may, with the permission of the court, submit written arguments after the evidence is .....

Sankaranarayanan Iyer Vs. Sri Poovananathaswami Temple, Through Execut ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1949)2MLJ171

..... the general law or common law as it might be called and do not fall within section 92, civil procedure code or its corresponding equivalent, section 73 of madras act ii of 1927, for these provisions do not authorise suits against third parties and strangers for possession of trust properties claiminga hostile title, raghavalu chettiar v. ..... implead the fourth in their suit to recover alienated property, the judicial committee dismissed the suit, because their lordships were of the opinion that those plaintiffs were acting from motives personal to themselves and sought to recover the property for their own use. in. baraboni coal concern, ltd. v. gokulananda mahanta thakur (1933 ..... country, it must be remembered that there are fundamental differences between the english and the indian systems. it is for this reason that the indian trusts act, which is modelled on the english law of trusts, specifically declares in section 1 that its provisions do not apply to public or private religious or .....

Manoharan Vs. Ms.Nagaladi Investments

Court : Chennai

..... exorbitant interest at the rate of 25.20% on the loan borrowed by the appellant contrary to section 3 of tamil nadu prohibition of charging exorbitant interest act 2003 (tn act no. 38 of 2003)?(3) whether the courts below are right in awarding interest at the rate of 25.20% contrary to the provisions of the ..... but the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant / defendant is that the appellant/defendant is an agriculturalist and therefore, the benefits of tamil nadu agriculturists relief act (iv of 1938) are to be showered on the appellant/ defendant. one cannot ignore an important fact that if a person claims that he is an agriculturalist, ..... then the onus squarely rests on him to prove that he comes within the purview of the definition of agriculturalist under the tamil nadu agriculturists relief act (iv of 1938).17. the trial court has found that the appellant / defendant has not established to the satisfaction that he is an agriculturalist entitled to the .....