Defensible - Judgment Search Results

Chakareshwar Nath JaIn Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC2009; 1981CriLJ1690; 1981(Supp)SCC11

..... separation under s 10 1 a of the hindu marriage act 1955 the respondent s defenses to the petition inter alia were that she never left the appellant s matrimonial home .....

Ramesh Chandra Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1981(1)SCALE841; 1981Supp(1)SCC60; 1981(13)LC265(SC)

..... suffer r i for three years appeal allowed to the extent herein indicated criminal private defense sections 300 302 and 304 of indian penal code 1860 and section 313 of criminal procedure code .....

Assessing Authority-cum-excise and Taxation Officer, Gurgaon and anr. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC1610; 1981(3)SCALE1067; (1981)3SCC531; [1982]1SCR55; [1981]48STC239(SC); 1981(13)LC688(SC)

..... or grievous hurt would be caused to him right of private defence is essentially a defensive right circumscribed by governing statute i e i p c it should not be allowed .....

Jugmandar Dass Vs. Ram Phal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1982All102

..... anyone from complying purpose achieved so undue technicality only application to strike off tenant s defense fails 5 in view of all this i am not satisfied that the court below .....

Rostker Vs. Goldberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... bernard rostker director selective service system and richard danzig principal deputy assistant secretary of defense the selective service system had been inactive however and funds were needed before ..... substantially furthers an important governmental interest footnote 2 18 as assistant secretary of defense pirie explained perhaps sufficient women volunteers would come forward to meet this need .....

County of Washington Vs. Gunther

Court: US Supreme Court

..... interpretation of like provisions in both statutes more importantly incorporation of the fourth affirmative defense could have significant consequences for title vii litigation pp 452 u s 168 ..... interpreting two sets of nearly identical language more importantly incorporation of the fourth affirmative defense could have significant consequences for title vii litigation title vii s prohibition of .....

Mcelroy Vs. Holloway

Court: US Supreme Court

..... sense reading of a statutory characterization of a defense as an affirmative defense however certainly suggests that its absence is not ..... reading given to this statutory characterization of self defense as an affirmative defense by the supreme court of georgia in the ..... reasonable doubt every fact constituting any and all affirmative defenses related to the culpability of an accused by interpreting .....

Estelle Vs. Smith

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and that interview proved to be a critical stage of the aggregate proceedings against respondent defense counsel were not notified in advance that the psychiatric examination would encompass the issue of ..... reason of insanity at the time of his offense when a defendant asserts the insanity defense and introduces supporting psychiatric testimony his silence may deprive the state of the only effective .....

Polk County Vs. Dodson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... color of state law within the meaning of 1983 footnote 7 in our system a defense lawyer characteristically opposes the designated representatives of the state the system assumes that adversarial testing ..... his client see also aba standards for criminal justice the prosecution function ch 3 the defense function ch 4 2d ed 1980 justice blackmun dissenting one perhaps should be particularly circumspect .....

Sushil Kumar and Others Vs. Collector of Central Excise and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1983(12)ELT687(Del)

..... not contain any provision respecting control of gold but by the defense of india amendment rules 1963 a new part xiia was inserted ..... parliament in 1965 it was never brought into force instead the defense of india fourth amendment rules were notified on 1st november 1966 ..... of a period of six months from the commencement of the defense of india fourth amendment rules 1966 acquire any primary gold by .....