Dedicator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: dedicator Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 37 results (0.007 seconds)Barry Vs. Barchi
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1979
barry v barchi 443 u s 55 1979 u s supreme court barry v barchi 443 u s 55 1979...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Kafi Khan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-11-1979
Reported in: AIR1979Cal354
orderm n roy j 1 in this rule the petitioner has impeached the charge sheet in annexure b the enquiry...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBell Vs. Wolfish
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1979
bell v wolfish 441 u s 520 1979 u s supreme court bell v wolfish 441 u s 520 1979...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Ganapathi Subramaniam and Three ors. Vs. S. Ganapathy Sunaram Pilla ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Oct-18-1979
Reported in: (1980)1MLJ464
..... though within the same compound or premises in this case lakshamana pillai has chosen to dedicate some properties for the services to be rendered in the siddhi vinayagar temple without reference ..... court s observation that as exhibit a 1 refers to shanmugasundareswarar siddhi vinayagar temple the dedication should be taken to be in favour of the samadhi called shanmugasundareswarar is not at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Gas Pipe Line Co. Vs. Mccombs
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1979
..... while acknowledging that 7 b expressly requires commission approval before a producer may withdraw dedicated natural gas from the interstate market the majority held that strict compliance with ..... have taken had an application been timely filed additionally the jurisdictional status of all dedicated acreage would become uncertain since the property would be subject to retroactive commission .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Executive Officer of Sri Ranganathaswami Devasthanam, Sri Rangam A ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-02-1979
Reported in: (1979)2MLJ280
..... as follows the above extract indicates that the property has been dedicated to the charity winch is the performance of the mandagapadi ..... courts below as not creating an endowment or constituting a complete dedication according to them a charge alone is created over a ..... 1890 the recitals therein are quite clear they make an absolute dedication of the properties mentioned in schedule 10 to the kattalai .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAyesha Khatoon and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-02-1979
Reported in: 1979(1)CHN426,83CWN776,[1980]126ITR489(Cal)
..... 10 of the bengal wakf act 1934 wakf means the permanent dedication by a person professing islam of movable or immovable property for ..... under the mussalman law the wakif may at the time of dedication reserve to himself the power to alter the beneficiaries either by ..... 127 in the former case is has been held that a dedication in general terms for charitable purposes highly commendable according to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Swarup and anr. Vs. Municipal Board, Bulandshahr and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jul-03-1979
Reported in: AIR1979All361
..... of municipal board mangalore supra the supreme court held that inference of dedication of a highway to the public may be drawn from long ..... court held that it was not disputed that the metalled road was dedicated to the public the inference that the side lands are included ..... behalf of the government being included in the public street it was dedicated to the public for the purposes of use as such and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGorelal and anr. Vs. Mulua
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-1979
Reported in: AIR1980MP73
..... on business orotherwise is not a public road a publichighway is dedicated not to a limitedsection of the public but for all subjects ..... road but it may neverthelessbe a highway if it has been dedicated tothe public at large as in the case of trunkroads therefore ..... not apublic road neither there is evidence toshow that this was dedicated to the public therefore the objection of the learned counsel cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFcc Vs. Midwest Video Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-02-1979
..... 406 u s 649 distinguished under the rules cable systems are required to hold out dedicated channels on a first come nondiscriminatory basis operators are prohibited from determining or influencing the ..... 100 television markets to design their systems to include at least 20 channels and to dedicate 4 of those channels for public governmental educational and leased access the rules were reassessed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial