Declaration Of Uses - Judgment Search Results

Rathinasabapathi Odayar Declared Major Vs. Gopala Odayar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1929Mad545; 121Ind.Cas.126; (1929)56MLJ673

33 is, Manu having premised two sets of six sons, declares the first six to be heirs and kinsmen, and the

Rathnamasari Declared Mad and ors. Vs. the Secretary of State for Indi ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1923)44MLJ132

1913 and the 26th September, 1913 and a special valuation statement submitted by him on the 12th June, 1913. With reference

V. Sampathkumari (Minor) by Next Friend and Husband C. Venkatachalapat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1962)2MLJ464

of the Court to make or refuse to make a declaration in such a suit and in that particular case they

Nittala Achayya (Dead) and ors. Vs. Nittala Yellamma, Lately a Minor b ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1923Mad109; (1922)43MLJ615

of the deceased person, has filed this suit for a declaration that the will is a forgery and does not affect

Aravamudha Iyengar, Formerly a Minor Since Declared Major and His Guar ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1952Mad245; (1952)1MLJ251

the present suit was instituted by the plaintiff for a declaration that the adoption of the first defendant by Rukmani Ammal

Reply by Way of Counter Affidavit of Kamlesh Kumari Vs. State of Punja ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

and 22.12.2011 prior to the issuance of memo dated 27.02.2013 declaring the cadre of Gram Sewak/Gram Sewika as a diminishing cadre

“1. Whether Plaintiff Is Entitled to Declaration as Prayed Vs. Swara ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the case are that the plaintiffs-respondents filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction, challenging the validity of Will allegedly suffered

S. Krishnaswami Aiyar, Late Minor by Guardian Meternal Uncle, Doraswam ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1935)68MLJ251

reference to that portion of the lower Court's decree which declares his interest in the plaint mentioned business liable to the

T.S. Swaminatha Odayar, Lately a Minor by Guardian Meenakshi Achi but ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1938)2MLJ704

Paragraph 11 of the lower Court's order contains the necessary declaration but there is no reason why the liability should be

“1. Whether the Plaintiffs Are Entitled to Declaration to the Vs. Sm ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

necessary parties and the plaintiffs are not entitled for the declaration that the order dated 16.6.2003 passed by the Assistant Collector