Skip to content


Decision - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: decision Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.275 seconds)
Jan 03 2000 (TRI)

Poddar Tubes and Pipes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-03-2000

Reported in: (2000)LC667Tri(Mum.)bai

..... should have been considered first and disposed off after hearing the party as per the decisions in the rulings referred above failure to give opportunity of hearing before disposal of appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2000 (TRI)

indus Engineering Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT179Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the tribunal found that the appeal itself could be disposed of and listed it for decision today the appeal is taken up for hearing after waiving deposit 2 the appellant at .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 2000 (TRI)

Sam Engineering Company Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-06-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT866TriDel

..... the sides we find that the issue on classification stands settled by the tribunal s decision in the case of shakun products reported in 1997 96 e l t 184 wherein .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2000 (TRI)

Pepsu Steel Rolling Mills Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-05-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT779TriDel

..... per annum and they will be liable to pay duty based on that capacity this decision is clearly erroneous it is elementary that once changes are made in the installed machinery .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2000 (TRI)

Spic Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jul-05-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT538Tri(Chennai)

..... the commissioner appeals 6 ld dr has no objection for remand of the matter for decision on merits 7 considered by consent of both sides we take up the appeal and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2000 (TRI)

Suessen Asia Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-05-2000

Reported in: (2000)(92)LC262Tri(Mum.)bai

1 these are four appeals filed by the assessee against the decisions commissioner of customs mumbai made on 30 9 1990 the order passed by the assistant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2000 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Tru Wheels Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jul-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT205TriDel

..... of law arise and since we do not find any reason to disagree with the decisions of this tribunal we hold that points of law arise in the circumstances we allow .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 04 2000 (TRI)

Prockage Soapery Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-04-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT529Tri(Mum.)bai

..... be considered in the context of the remaining parts of the rule in the former decision the tribunal has also made a point that the rule must be so considered as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2000 (TRI)

Herdillia Unimers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-03-2000

Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT504Tri(Mum.)bai

..... known as supported catalysts or of mixtures with a basis of active substances in the majority of cases these active substances are certain metals metallic oxides other metallic compounds or mixtures .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Switch N Control Gears

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-10-2000

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT477Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 5 the respondent is absent and unrepresented and on the last occasion had requested the decision on merits 6 the notification is a continuing notification valid for clearance from 1 4 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //