Deceptive - Judgment Search Results

Zauderer Vs. Office of Disc. Counsel

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of a substantial governmental interest the state s contention that the problem of distinguishing deceptive and nondeceptive legal advertising is different in kind from the problems presented by ..... advertising simply to spare itself the trouble of distinguishing such advertising from false or deceptive advertising the first amendment protections afforded commercial speech would mean little indeed if .....

Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc Vs. Scientific-atlanta, Inc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not answer the objection that petitioner did not in fact rely upon respondents own deceptive conduct liability is appropriate petitioner contends because respondents engaged in conduct with the purpose ..... proximately caused charter s misstatement of income petitioner has alleged that respondents knew their deceptive acts would be the basis for statements that would influence the market price of .....

United States Vs. O'Hagan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... id at 476 similarly full disclosure forecloses liability under the misappropriation theory because the deception essential to the misappropriation theory involves feigning fidelity to the source of information if ..... under that section be reasonably designed to prevent acts and practices that are fraudulent deceptive or manipulative as the majority itself recognizes there is no general duty between all .....

Wockhardt Limited Vs. Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)2MLJ467

..... would be likely to deceive or cause confusion section 12 prohibits registration of identical or deceptively similar trade marks which is already registered in the name of different proprietor in ..... of the respondent it is now well settled that the court while considering likelihood of deception or confusion must make allowance for imperfect recollection and the effect of careless pronounciation and .....

Itc Limited Vs. Cg Foods (inida) Private Limited

Court: Karnataka

..... that sufficiency of similarities and not dissimilarities is the relevant test for likelihood of deception he contends that the sufficiency of similarity analysis cannot be done without looking at ..... consideration of these two aspects cannot be completely separated from each other as whether deception or confusion is likely is ultimately a single question of fact source identification being .....

Walter Bushnel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Mankind Pharma Pvt. Ltd. and Another

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... drotikind 80 by the respondent in relation to pharmaceutical preparations which are identical and or deceptively similar to the trade mark drotin is dishonest mala fide tainted and in bad faith ..... they have thus overall structural and phonetic similarity and therefore likely to cause confusion and deception to a man of average intelligence and of imperfect recollection the medicinal product being used .....

Lupin Limited Vs. Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

..... the defendants are infringing the plaintiff s registered trademark the impugned mark nebistol is deceptively similar to the plaintiff s registered trademark nebistar the marks are phonetically almost identical ..... an overarching public interest that requires a lower threshold of proof of confusing or deceptive similarity where the trade marks in question are applied to pharmaceutical products drugs .....

ITC Ltd Vs. Britannia Industries Ltd

Court: Delhi

..... the plaintiff s packaging trade dress of sunfeast farmlitedigestive all good biscuit by using a deceptively and confusinglysimilar trade dress for its nutri choice digestive zero biscuit the relief claimed in ..... appears reasonable britannia s rejection of these suggestions has brought about a situation where the deception and confusion in the mind of the average health conscious consumer is likely to .....

United Biotech Pvt. Ltd Vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd a ...

Court: Delhi

..... arguments were substantially the same the learned single judge first took up the issue of deceptive similarity between the two competing marks forzid and orzid according to the learned single judge ..... the plaintiff thereby causing damage to him in the process difference between the confusion and deception is to be understood this difference was explained by lord denning in 8220 difference confusion .....

Prem Nath Mayer Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1972Cal261,76CWN459

..... of fact the provisions of the act enjoin this court to determine questions of deception confusion and deceptive similarity and that can only be done by taking into consideration the evidence tendered ..... the registrar the allahabad high court held that there was no possibility of confusion and deception and there was no justification for refusal to register the trade mark lakshmandhara for the .....