Skip to content


Dated - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: dated Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.117 seconds)
Aug 28 2001 (TRI)

Suchitra N. Date Vs. Collector of Customs (Prev.),

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-28-2001

..... kept the gold in safe custody with smt date at a later date however smt date changed her statement she claimed that she had ..... also changed his confession following the second statement made by smt date the commissioner in the impugned order confiscated the gold and ..... was claimed that the officers had entered the residence of smt date without having panch witnesses that the panch witnesses were not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2001 (HC)

Mrs. Meena Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Mar-30-2001

Reported in: 2001(49)BLJR1605; 2001CriLJ3573

orderdeoki nandan prasad j 1 this application has been filed under article 226 of the constitution of india by the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Konark Printing and Packaging Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-09-2001

..... of duty has been rejected by the authorities the duty demand has notbeen quantified till date 2 on hearing both sides and noting that the penalty amount is very small without .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Sportking Synthetics Vs. Cce, Chandigarh

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-09-2001

..... direct the applicants to deposit rs one lakh towards penalty within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order on such deposit pre deposit of balance penalty shall stand .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Mono Acrylic Manufacturing Vs. C.C. Amritsar

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-09-2001

Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC619

..... acrylic off cuts sheets etc and claimed clearance thereof against bill of entry no 229 dated 8 6 96 the value of the goods was declared as us 6222 equivalent to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

M/S Dynamatic Technologies Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

..... the matter to examine the issue afresh as per the final order no 2822 99 dated 4 11 99 he requested that in line with that matter the same may be .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

Yangir Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)(134)ELT462Tri(Mum.)bai

..... three more months can be granted to the applicant s for complying with the order dated 23 5 1996 we therefore direct that in modifying the earlier order the applicant may .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

M/S. Dancap Electronics and Others Vs. C.C.E. B'Lore I And Others

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)(132)ELT202Tri(Bang.)

..... order no s 155 177 2001 as well as final order no 249 299 2001 dated 27 2 2001 in the case of m s wipro ltd and others most of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Eagle Flask Industries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT883Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the department this ground does not merit any discussion at all 4 board s instruction dated 3 3 1988 and 13 2 1990 have also been cited to agitate against the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

Shri Sarbjit Singh Vs. Cc New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-08-2001

..... owner of the truck on supurdari of rs 3 00 000 vide acmm court order dated 11 6 99 was liable for confiscation under section 115 2 though the truck has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //