Dated - Judgment Search Results

Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers (P.) Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... petitioner and the third respondent there was no reference to date of any resolution now the respondents have fabricated the said ..... of the allotment cannot be sustained inasmuch as the directors report dated 2 9 1999 specifically records the allotment of these shares ..... appointment as additional director was also indicated in the directors report dated 2 9 1999 thus it is evident that the petitioner .....

Sona Steering Systems Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)78TTJ(Delhi)213

..... such special discount was neither paid in the past nor in future till date therefore the alleged discount was nothing but application of its income the ..... of rs 10 each at the end of 6 months from the date of allotment and consequently face value of the debenture was to be ..... of the company within a short period of 6 months from the date of allotment it was only part b which was to be returned .....

Puri Bros. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: [2002]122TAXMAN82(NULL)

..... had filed an appeal or any reference was pending on the date of taxation under the scheme referred to above according to the ..... the petitioner submits that a reply was sent to the communication dated 1 3 1999 it is submitted that the benefit of tax ..... the total tax determined and payable but which remains unpaid on the date of making a declaration under section 88 this therefore represents the .....

Romesh Lal Mottan and ors. Vs. State and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3386

..... made it shall also be countersigned by the arrestee and shall contain the time and date of arrest 3 a person who has been arrested or detained and is being held .....

Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Saroj Devi and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2002ACJ1146

..... shall also be paid at such rate and from such date not earlier than the date of making the claim as may be specified in ..... section 140 shall be deducted from the principal amount as on the date of its payment and interest shall be recalculated on the balance amount ..... of the principal sum from such date 23 thus what can safely be concluded from the above discussion .....

Subhash Arora Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2002]82ITD346(Delhi)

..... the shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was not income chargeable to tax the honble supreme court ..... of shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was income chargeable 8 now we would deal with the ..... of shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was income chargeable from a bare perusal of section 47 .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dayawati Modi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)623; 97(2002)DLT170

..... be additional reasons for doing so it may be mentioned at this stage that order dated 12 12 1974 of the income tax appellate tribunal is annexed as annexure in the .....

Jindal Photo Films Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)(103)LC270Tri(Mum.)bai

1 the dispute in this case relates to valuation of photographic film processing machine imported by the appellant the facts...

Subhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... the price of the shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was not income chargeable to tax the hon ble supreme court held that ..... between the price of shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was income chargeable 8 now we would deal with the contentions raised by .....

Subhash Arora Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)82ITD345(Delhi)

..... the price of the shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was not income chargeable to tax the hon ble supreme court held that ..... between the price of shares of the first company and the second company on the date of exchange was income chargeable 8 now we would deal with the contentions raised by .....