Skip to content


Dated - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: dated Sorted by: old Year: 1913 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.085 seconds)
1913

Northern Pacific Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

..... by mistake as public lands granted to the railroad company under the act of congress dated july 2 1864 13 stat 365 c 217 the lands actually being it is alleged ..... state of washington set aside and established by treaty with the yakima nation of indians dated june nine eighteen hundred and fifty five provided that the claim of said indians to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1913

United States Vs. Baltimore and Ohio R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1913

united states v baltimore ohio r co 231 u s 274 1913 u s supreme court united states v baltimore...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Sukhbir Singh Vs. Nihal Singh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.232

..... it is declared that neither the plaintiff nor the defendants are trustees under the deed dated the 21st of may 1893 this declaration however cannot affect any other right of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1913 (PC)

Venkatesaperumal Chetty Vs. S. Parthasarathy Iyengar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-02-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.986

..... the plaintiff has shown that on the 1st august which was the date of delivery there was a difference of more than 6 annas on ..... per cent per annum from the 1st august 1911 up to this date the plaintiff will have his costs and further interest at 6 per ..... cent per annum from this date up to the date of realization construction of contract exemption from liability ambiguous or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Haridas Roy and ors. Vs. Sarat Chandra Dey and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.121

..... of 1877 the limitation act which governs this case the date of instituting the suit must be held to be the date on which the plaint was filed in the court having ..... costs this appeal is decreed with costs limitation limitation act xv of 1877 section 14 date of institution date of filing in court having jurisdiction

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Makbul Ali Vs. Ali Ahmad

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: (1913)ILR40Cal514

holmwood and chapman jj 1 this second appeal arises out of a suit for redemption brought by the mortgagor plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Bhuphndra Narayan Dutt and ors. Vs. Rajendra Nath Dutt and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.455

..... 20th february 1896 his brother nagendra took out a succession certificate dated the 3rd july following entitling him to collect the debts due ..... this transaction was effected in the first instance by an instrument dated the 29th december 1903 a further and more formal deed was ..... remained on the record as judgment debtors but on the same date the 23rd march the present appellants came in and asked for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Makbul Ali and ors. Vs. Ali Ahmed and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.80

1 this second appeal arises out of a suit for redemption brought by the mortgagor plaintiff against the mortgagee defendant...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Anantha Lakshmi Ammall Vs. Kunnanchankarath Sankaran Nair

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: 18Ind.Cas.579

..... did not pay into court before the expiration of 30 days from the date of sale the deposit of 5 per cent on the purchase money ..... by the court be confirmed the auction purchaser s title would no doubt date from the time of the sale but he does not get a ..... mentioned in the section it is almost impossible that any one whose title dated prior to the attachment could do so it would be hardly reasonable to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1913 (PC)

Anantha Lakshmi Ammal Vs. Kunnanchankarath Sankaran Nair

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-03-1913

Reported in: (1913)24MLJ205

..... not pay into court before the expiration of 30 day s from the date of sale the deposit of 5 percent on the purchase money and ..... by the court be confirmed the auction purchaser s title would no doubt date from the time of the sale but he does not get a ..... mentioned in the section it is almost impossible that any one whose title dated prior to the attachment could do so it would be hardly reasonable to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //