Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-05-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 115-116 OF2017(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 26523-26524 OF2012 Secretary Mahatama Gandhi Mission & Another Appellants Versus Bhartiya Kamgar Sena & Others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 117-118 OF2017(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 26525-26526 OF2012 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 119-120 OF2017(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 26519-26520 OF2012 JUDGMENT Chelameswar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The first appellant in all these three appeals is a charitable trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The first appellant established and has been administering two engineering colleges, one at Nanded and another at Aurangabad in the State of Maharashtra. The first respondent appears to be an unregistered body of persons who are the employees of the first appellant. They are the staff of the abovementioned two engineering colleges belonging either to the category of teaching or non-teaching staff. The details ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-02-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.37 OF1992ABHIRAM SINGH .APPELLANT VERSUS C.D. COMMACHEN (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. .RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.8339 OF1995NARAYAN SINGH .APPELLANT VERSUS SUNDERLAL PATWA & ORS. .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Madan B. Lokur, J.1. The foundation for this reference relating to the interpretation of Section 123(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 to a Bench of seven judges has its origins in three decisions of this Court.2. In Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen[1]. the election in 1990 of Abhiram Singh to the No.40, Santa Cruz Legislative Assembly Constituency for the Maharashtra State Assembly was successfully challenged by Commachen in the Bombay High Court. While hearing the appeal against the decision of the Bombay High Court, a Bench of three learned Judges expressed the view that the content, scope and what constitutes a corrupt practice under sub- sections (3) or (3A) of Section 123 of the Repres...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-22-2017
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Original Civil Jurisdiction Writ Petition (C) No.118 of 2016 Shayara Bano Union of India and others Petitioner Respondents versus with Suo Motu Writ (C) No.2 of 2015 In Re: Muslim Womens Quest For Equality Jamiat Ulma-I-Hind versus Writ Petition(C) No.288 of 2016 Aafreen Rehman Union of India and others versus Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition(C) No.327 of 2016 Gulshan Parveen Union of India and others versus Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition(C) No.665 of 2016 Ishrat Jahan Union of India and others versus Petitioner Respondents Writ Petition(C) No.43 of 2017 Atiya Sabri Union of India and others versus Petitioner Respondents JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI. 2 Sl. No.1. Divisions Part-1 2. Part-2 3.4.5. Part-3 Part-4 Part-5 6.7. 8.9. A. B. C. Part-6 Part-7 I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Part-8 Part-9 Consideration of the rival contentions, and our Index Contents The petitioners marital discord, and the petitioners prayers The prac...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-24-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO494OF2012JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD.), AND ANR. ..Petitioners VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..Respondents WITH T.C. (CIVIL) NO151OF2013T.C. (CIVIL) NO152OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO833OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO829OF2013W.P.(CIVIL) NO932OF2013CONMT. PET. (CIVIL) NO144OF2014IN W.P.(C) No.494/2012 T.P.(CIVIL) NO313OF2014T.P.(CIVIL) NO312OF2014S.L.P(CRL.) NO.2524/2014 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.37/2015 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.220/2015 1 CONMT. PET. (C)NO.674/2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.829/2013 T.P.(CIVIL)NO.921/2015 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.470/2015 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.444/2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.608/2016 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 W.P.(CIVIL) NO.797/2016 CONMT.PET.(C)NO.844/2017 IN W.P.(C) NO.494/2012 W.P. (C) No.342/ 2017 AND WITH W.P.(C) NO.000372/2017 JUDGMENT Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are : A The reference B Decision in M P Sharma C D E F...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Nov-23-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.67 OF2017NIKESH TARACHAND SHAH PETITIONER UNION OF INDIA & ANR. RESPONDENTS VERSUS WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.103 OF2017WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.144 OF2017WITH WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO.152 OF2017WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2012 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7326 OF2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2013 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7786 OF2017 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2014 OF2017(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CRL) NO.7789 OF2017 1 JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. Leave granted.2. The present writ petitions and appeals raise the question of the constitutional validity of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Section 45(1) imposes two conditions for grant of bail where an offence punishable for a term of imprisonment of more than 3 years under Part A of the Schedule to the Act is involved. The conditions are that the Public Prosecutor must be given an oppo...
Tag this Judgment!