Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: dangerous machines regulation act 1983 chapter ii administration of the act Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.050 seconds)

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. State (Cbi/Spe)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2120; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)157; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)762; 1997(1)BLJR263; 1998CriLJ2930; 1998(3)SCALE53; (1998)4SCC626; [1998]2SCR870

..... by widening their coverage and by strengthening the provisions.2. the prevention of corruption act, 1947, was amended in 1964 based on the recommendations of the santhanam committee. there are provisions in chapter ix of the indian penal code to deal with ..... ., concurring, said that the house of commons was not subject to the control of her majesty's courts in its administration of that part of the statute law which had relation to its own internal proceedings, and that the use ..... abuse might occur, but this possibility which he considered remote, had to be balanced against the potential danger flowing from either the absence of a bribery statute applicable to members of congress or holding that such a statute violated the constitution. as ..... legislature was competent to take proceedings against the judge in the exercise of its powers, privileges and immunities. the adjectival clause 'regulating the procedure of the legislature' in article 194(1) governed, it was held, both the preceding clauses relating to ..... rao do not lay down any different principle. on the other hand in sanjeev coke ., : [1983]1scr1000 , this court has laid down:-'no one may speak for the parliament and parliament is never before ..... voice or gesture or the aid of a machine, is treated as an extension of speech or a substitute for speech and is given the protection that the spoken word has. two comments need to be made in regard to the plain language of the first part of sub-article (2). first, what has protection is .....