Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).971973 OF2008BHASKAR SHRACHI ALLOYS LTD. ETC.ETC. VERSUS .APPELLANT(S) DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1914 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).45044508 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4289 OF2008JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 This group of appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as learned Appellate Tribunal). The challenge in the appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as CERC) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Corporation) from the consumers of electricity generated and transmitted by the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).971973 OF2008BHASKAR SHRACHI ALLOYS LTD. ETC.ETC. VERSUS .APPELLANT(S) DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1914 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).45044508 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4289 OF2008JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 This group of appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as learned Appellate Tribunal). The challenge in the appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as CERC) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Corporation) from the consumers of electricity generated and transmitted by the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).971973 OF2008BHASKAR SHRACHI ALLOYS LTD. ETC.ETC. VERSUS .APPELLANT(S) DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1914 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).45044508 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4289 OF2008JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 This group of appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as learned Appellate Tribunal). The challenge in the appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as CERC) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Corporation) from the consumers of electricity generated and transmitted by the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).971973 OF2008BHASKAR SHRACHI ALLOYS LTD. ETC.ETC. VERSUS .APPELLANT(S) DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION & ORS. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1914 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).45044508 OF2008CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).4289 OF2008JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, J1 This group of appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 23rd November, 2007 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal for Electricity at New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as learned Appellate Tribunal). The challenge in the appeals before the learned Appellate Tribunal was against the order of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (hereinafter referred to as CERC) dated 3rd October, 2006 determining the tariff 2 chargeable by the Damodar Valley Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Corporation) from the consumers of electricity generated and transmitted by the Corporation. The tariff has been determined under the provisions of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad
Reported in : (1984)9ITD206(All.)
1. This is an appeal filed against the order dated 21-2-1980 of the learned Commissioner (Appeals) by the U.P. Forest Corporation--the assessee ('the corporation') for the assessment year 1976-77.2. The corporation was constituted by the UP State Government under Gazette Notification dated 25-11-1974 under Section 3(1) of the U.P.Forest Corporation Act, 1974 ('the 1974 Act')- It is a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal capable of suing and being sued in its corporate name. It has power to acquire, hold and dispose of property. The Act was brought into existence to provide for the better preservation supervision and development of forests and better exploitation of forest produce within the State and for matters connected therewith. Section 3(3) provides that the corporation shall, for all purposes, be a local authority. Section 14 of the 1974 Act enumerates its functions, they being:-- (a) to undertake removal and disposal of trees and exploitation of forest r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Patna
B.N. Agrawal, J.1. This writ application has been filed for quashing orders dated 12.1.1996, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Hazaribagh, contained in annexures 4, 5 and 6, whereby purporting to act under Section 7A of the Bihar Electricity Duty Act, 1948 (hereinafter to be refereed to as 'the Act') bank accounts of the petitioner-company in three banks viz. United Commercial Bank, Ranchi, State Bank of India, Ranchi and Bank of India, Ranchi have been attached for payment of the amount of surcharge under Section 3A of the Act. Further prayer has been made for a declaration that the petitioners are not liable to pay amount of surcharge under Section 3A of the Act.2. Short facts are that petitioner No. 1is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act having its registered office in the district of Hazaribagh and petitioner No. 2 is its Deputy Manger (Accounts). The petitioner-company is manufacturer of alloys, tool and special steel and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF APRIL, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NOs.15967-15969/2017 c/w 21196/2017, 18876/2016 & 18948-18950/2016 (LA-BDA) & 21193-21195/2017 (BDA) W.P.Nos.15967-15969/2017 BETWEEN:1. SRI S. HAREESH S/O. LATE N. SHANTHARAM, AGED ABOUT52YEARS, 73/52, 2ND FLOOR, CHANDRA APARTMENT, 4TH CROSS, BASAWESHWAR LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560 040.2.3. SRI M.S. SHANMUKHA S/O. M.K. SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMGONDALU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562 132. SRI S. GURUPRASAD S/O. LATE N. SHANTHARAM, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, NO.24, 13TH CROSS, GAYATHRI LAYOUT, BASAVANAPURA ROAD, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE 560 036. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SMT. MAYA HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, - 2 - 2.3. 4.5. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE 560 001. THE BANGALORE DEV...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JANUARY, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION Nos.3536-3538/2015 & WRIT PETITION No.3539/2015 (LA-KIADB) S/O. NARAPPA, AGED ABOUT53YEARS, S/O. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, S/O. MURIGEPPA, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, BETWEEN:1. D. SHARANAPPA2 D. JAYAPPA3 B.M. SHIVAKUMAR4 B. MANJAPPA5 D. BASAVARAJA S/O. NARAPPAM, AGED ABOUT48YEARS, (BY SRI: P.H. VIRUPAKSHAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. ALL ARE R/AT MAHAJENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HARIHARA TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT 577 601. S/O. H.B. REVANAPPA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS ... PETITIONERS STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, #14/3, 2ND FLOOR, R.P.BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, 2 BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.3.4. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NRUPATHUNGA...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION Nos.17852-17856/2014 & 17969/2014 c/w W.P.Nos.17290/2014 & 17673-17687/2014, W.P.No.20626/2016 (LA-BDA) In W.P.Nos.17852-17856/2014 & 17969/2014 BETWEEN:1. M/S. EVERSHINE MONUMENTS (EARLIER KNOWN AS M/S. GRANITE EXPORTERS) A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.15, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE, REP. BY ITS PARTNER, MR. MUNNAVAR BASHA AGED ABOUT83YEARS.2. MR. MUNNAVAR BASHA S/O. LATE MOHAMMED BASHA, AGED ABOUT83YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.15 VITTAL MALLYA ROAD, BANGALORE 560 001.3. MRS. MAQBOOL JAAN W/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 517 425.4. MRS. MUDASHIRA BEGUM D/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, AGED ABOUT45YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRADESH 517 425.5. MRS. REHANA BEGUM D/O. ASGAR AHAMAD PASHA, - 2 - AGED ABOUT40YEARS, RESIDING AT LAKSHMIPURAM, KUPPAM, ANDHRA PRAD...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- :1. :- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE01T DAY OF DECEMBER, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA W.A.No.1415/2018 (LA BDA) BETWEEN: SRI. L.RAMAREDDY, SON OF LATE LINGA REDDY, AGED ABOUT73YEARS, RESIDING AT No.10/1, 26TH MAIN ROAD, HSR LAYOUT, AGARA VILLAGE, AGARA POST, BENGALURU 560 034. APPELLANT (BY SRI. SAMPATH BAPAT, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560 001. REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY.2. THE COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560 020.3. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, - :2. :- KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU 560 020.4. NANDA RANGASWAMY, WIFE OF RANGASWAMY, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDING AT No.213, D BLOCK, BRIGADE PALM SPRING APARTMENT, J.P.NAGAR7H PHASE, BENGALURU 560 078.5. SHAMEEM FATIMA, WIFE OF M.ENAYATH ULLA SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT59YEARS, REPRESENTED BY G...
Tag this Judgment!