Customs Tariff Amendment Act 2003 Chapter Xxix - Judgment Search Results

A. Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1982Delhi1008

customs tariff amendment bill no 50 of 1982 and the customs tariff amendment act no 40 of 1982 and the notification tariff amendment bill no 50 of 1982 and the customs tariff amendment act no 40 of 1982 and the notification dated time to stainless steel sheets objects and reasons of the amendment bill 13 the next submission made in this regard is made an order under section 132a of the income tax act directing the assistant collector not to release the goods rather be or could be less than what is specified in chapter 73 15 of the schedule i to the customs tariff of this petition was issued for 2 7 1982 on 29 6 1982 news of the contempt petition was published in

Bhikamchand Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993(43)ECC36

is claimed to fall under 73 15 2 of the customs tariff item for the purposes of import duty the petitioner valuation of the goods imported the rates of duty and tariff valuation applicable to a particular case of import is the the said contract with the foreign supplier the customs tariff amendment bill 1982 was introduced in parliament on 15 4 1982 the criteria fixed under section 15 1 a of the act can have no relevance in the matter of application to in support of the writ petitions states that he imported 29 077 metric tonnes of stainless steel circles defective circles in

Akbar BadrudIn Jiwani of Bombay Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1990SC1579; 1990(27)ECC69; 1990(47)ELT161(SC); JT1990(1)SC256; 1990(1)SCALE176; (1990)2SCC203; [1990]1SCR369; 1990(1)LC514(SC)

000 in lieu of confiscation under section 125 of the customs act 1962 the option to be exercised within 60 days act 1975 thus the elaborate statutory scheme of the customs tariff import schedule got applied to the import schedule as well heading number of the first schedule to the customs tariff amendment act 1985 as amended on 24 1 1986 and each that in interpreting items in statutes like the sales tax acts resort should be had not to the scientific or technical each heading number in column 1 corresponds to the respective chapter and heading number of this first schedule to the customs into blocks or slabs of a rectangular including square shape 29 appendix 2 part b of the import and export policy

M/S. Chheda Industries Vs. Collector of Customs, Madras

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC2080; 1997(91)ELT241(SC); JT1997(4)SC215; 1997(3)SCALE329; (1997)6SCC88; [1997]3SCR343

tariff heading 73 15 has been subsequently amended by the customs tariff amendment act of 1982 by which tariff entry 73 classifiable under customs tariff entry 73 15 2 instead under tariff entry 73 15 1 as contended by the importers the imported in the guise of folded angles and circles the amendment whereby angles shapes section and circles of stainless steel are 15 has been subsequently amended by the customs tariff amendment act of 1982 by which tariff entry 73 15 2 has relies upon note 1 n of the chapter note of chapter 73 dealing with iron and steel and articles thereof entry

Super Traders and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1983(12)ELT258(Del)

2 of the schedule no order was obtained from the customs authorities no resort was made to the remedies of appeal lower rates of duty by virtues of general agreement on tariff and trade gatt in that context the fact that international parliament to have allocated special urgent time to pass the amendment act 15 of 1982 that the sole reason why the steel in 73 15 2 as under the customs tariff act there is no distinction between prime and defective items all include circles in this connection one cannot ignore that under chapter 73 note 1 n specifically has said that sheets are unconditionally or with such conditions as it may deem fit 29 one other reason why this court should refrain from interfering

Nirma Limited. Vs. Saint GobaIn Glass India Limited and ors.

Court: Chennai

..... sections 9 a to 9 c in the customs tariff act vide the customs tariff amendment act 1995 6 of 1995 which replaced the ..... the said soda ash is classified under chapter 28 of the act under subheading no 2836 20 according to ..... upon another interim order passed by this court on 29 4 2011 wherein this court while modifying its ..... 2006 9 scc 90 cit v shelly products 2003 5 scc 461 12 9 to substantiate his .....

Haridas Exports Vs. All India Float Glass Mfrs. Association and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC2728; [2002]111CompCas617(SC); II(2002)CPJ11(SC); 99(2002)DLT76(SC); 2002(82)ECC683; 2002LC14(SC); 2002(145)ELT241(SC); JT2002(5)SC253; 2002(5)SCALE253; (2002)6SC

the above the mrtp act and the provisions of the customs tariff act cover the same subject matter as the scope first time inserted provisions 9a to 9c in the customs tariff act vide the customs tariff amendment act 1995 no 6 9c in the customs tariff act vide the customs tariff amendment act 1995 no 6 of 1995 which replaced the provisions other laws there was no specific provision in the mrtp act which made any other law inapplicable and there was no supply distribution or control of goods for such export 26 chapter v contains provisions relating to restrictive trade practices and unfair to restrictive trade practices is dealt with by section 37 29 we will first consider whether the mrtp act has extra

Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2006(202)ELT23(SC); JT2006(12)SC478; 2006(9)SCALE124; (2006)10SCC368

for the respondent has relied on rule 7 of the customs tariff identification assessment and collection of anti dumping duty on anti dumping duty imposition of section 9a of the customs tariff act 1975 held once dumping of goods from a country act 1975 which was inserted by the customs tariff second amendment act 1982 section 9a was substituted by the customs tariff from a careful reading of section 9a of the tariff act and rule 6 of the rules it is clear that this court in sterlite industries india ltd v designated authority 2003ecr1018 sc observed thus in our view it is not necessary appeal has been filed against the impugned final order dated 29 11 2000 passed by the cegat customs excise and gold

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court: Chennai

..... a new section 9 a under the customs tariff amendment act 14 of 1994 to take effect from 01 01 ..... a special economic zone to the domestic tariff area 29 section 30 of the central enactment and section ..... trading corporation v state of tamil nadu 2003 129 stc 294 a bench of this court was ..... with chapter viii the expression customs area is defined in section 2 11 to mean the area of a customs station .....

Collector of Customs Vs. Bhor Industries Ltd. and anr.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1985)LC363Tri(Delhi)

covered by note 2 c to chapter 39 of the customs tariff accordingly he allowed the appeals however the central government did not undergo any change even when in 1978 the tariff entry itself underwent revision 15 we have already seen plasticizers to a pre 1 8 1978 importation leaving side the amendment of 1978 for the nonce the order discussed the issue of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act c e t for short after clearance of the goods adopted all the arguments of shri deshpande he emphasised that chapter note 2 c spoke of resols liquid polyisobutylenes and similar chemical compound it would not fall within chapter 28 or 29 since it is not specified elsewhere the appropriate classification would