Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter x cereals Court: karnataka Page 6 of about 408 results (0.123 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Vinayaka Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. A S Nirmala Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Venkatesh Vs. M/s Green Apartments

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Bhandarkar's Arts And Science College Trust Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Highland Enterprises Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri S Somashekara Reddy Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

G S Mahadev Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Jamnalal Bajaj Seva Trust Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

S B Jagadeesh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

B.s. Biddappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //