Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter ix coffee tea mate and spices Sorted by: recent Page 9 of about 959 results (0.262 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Sharadamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Janaki Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Prakashnath Vs. State By Special Public Prosecutor

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt. Priyadarshini Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri T Krishna Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Uma Balagavi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt K N Nagarathnamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

B T Sanjeevaiah Vs. B S Jayaram

Court : Karnataka

..... takes away jurisdiction of civil court; (10) though section 7 mandates constitution of additional benches across the state, same have not been constituted; (11) amendment act provided for abatement of proceedings only in respect of two enactments and it is discriminatory.24. before embarking upon the journey of discussion on the above points, ..... the bar, we are of the considered view that following point would arise for our consideration:"whether the karnataka land grabbing prohibition act, 2011 (karnataka act 38 of 387 2014) and amendment act 30 of 2020 or any of its provision requires to be struck down on the ground of same being violative of the constitution ..... notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or custom, usage or agreement or decree or order of a court or any other tribunal or authority, the provisions of klgp act-2011 as amended from time- to-time would prevail and the offence of land grabbing committed would continue. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //