Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter ix coffee tea mate and spices Sorted by: recent Court: delhi Page 1 of about 101 results (0.113 seconds)

Jan 20 2016 (HC)

Vikas Singh Vs. Lieutenant Governor and Others

Court : Delhi

..... ; (ii) bye-law 2.51 whereof defines master plan as the master plan for delhi approved by the central government under the delhi development act, 1957 and the amendments made from time to time; (iii) bye-law 2.02 whereof provides that the words and expressions not defined in the bye-laws shall have the ..... same meaning or sense as in the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957, delhi development act and the master plan for delhi; (iv) bye-law 2.03 whereof provides that all ..... units, parking standards etc. for various categories of buildings including modifications thereof made from time to time shall be applicable mutatis mutandis in the building regulations and that all amendments / modifications made in the building regulations will automatically be included as part of the bye-laws; (v) bye-law 2.36 whereof defines floor area ratio (far) .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2002 (TRI)

Sony India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Icd, New

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2002)(82)ECC436

..... not applicable to the facts of the present case where interpretation of rule 2(a) of interpretative rules in customs tariff is involved. even otherwise in view of the amendment on 14-3-97 which, according to the commissioner, has retrospective effect, the complexity of the process is irrelevant. therefore, the commissioner ..... kits of ctv for model kv-2185ge. reliance is placed on rule 2(a) of the general rules for interpretation of the first schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975 in support of the allegation that the 94 consignments were to be treated as complete ctv, unassembled or disassembled. it was also alleged that the ..... subsequent to the process of texturising, poy that was imported would have the denierage stated under item (iii). therefore, for the purpose of imposing duty under the customs tariff act the intention of the importer to utilize the component for manufacturing ctv sets is not relevant. learned member technical distinguished the case cc v. milsnny electronic works, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 28 2002 (TRI)

Sony India Ltd. Vs. Cc, Icd

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2002)(103)LC288Tri(Delhi)

..... not applicable to the facts of the present case where interpretation of rule 2{a) of interpretative rules in customs tariff is involved. even otherwise in view of the amendment on 14.3.1997 which, according to the commissioner, has retrospective effect, the complexity of the process is irrelevant. therefore, the commissioner ..... 2002 (142) elt 16 (sc) : 2002 (103) ecr 283 (sc), the supreme court has reiterated the same legal position in an assessment under the customs tariff act. the orders passed by the tribunal were set aside and remanded for fresh consideration for the reason that the tribunal had declined to place reliance on the explanatory ..... process of text rising, poy that was imported would have the denier age stated under item (iii). therefore, for the purpose of imposing duty under the customs tariff act the intention of the importer to utilize the component for manufacturing ctv sets is not relevant.learned member technical distinguished the case cc v. mitsuny electronic works .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 1992 (HC)

Sai Overseas Imports and Exports Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 48(1992)DLT512; 1993(41)ECC114

..... 24.864 m.t. of stainless steel circles. the respondents in terms of heading 73.15(2) in part iii of the 1st schedule of the customs tarrif act (for short called 'the act'), demanded from the petitioner duty at the rate of 225% on the value of the imported goods. the said duty was imposed at the rate of ..... reproduce the relevant headings as they stood at the relevant time, which are as follows : heading sub-heading no. and standard central no. description of rate of excise article duty tariff item (1) (2) (3) (4) 73.12 hoop and strip, of iron 40% 26aa or steel, hot-rolled or cold rolled. 73.13 sheets and plates, of ..... the writ petition was moved and the said application was also allowed on 10th may, 1982. in the amended writ petition the petitioner also challenged the custom tarrif amended bill 1982 which sought to amend the heading 73.15 with retrospective effect from 1st january, 1981. during the pendency of the writ petition the petitioner also filed an additional affidavit on 23rd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 1984 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Bhor Industries Ltd. and anr.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (1985)LC363Tri(Delhi)

..... s file no.5/8-147/79b in the case of bhor industries) were imported after 1-8-1978 on which date tariff heading 39.01/06 underwent a change by virtue of the customs tariff (amendment) act of 1978 which, came into force on 1-8-1978. the new entry made the heading fully aligned with the corresponding headings ..... of the customs co-operation council nomenclature (cccn).8. shri sundar rajan then drew our attention to this tribunal's order no. c-449 ..... plasticizer-was, therefore, held to be not falling under heading 39.01/06 of the customs tariff act as it stood at the relevant time, i.e. prior to the 1978 amendment.14. now, let us look at the 1978 amendment and its effect. the pre-amendment heading read: "39.01/06-artificial resins such as condensation, polycondensation, polyaddition, polymerisation and .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 1981 (HC)

Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1985(4)ECC303; 1986(25)ELT171(Del)

..... whether this can be legally done within the frame-work of the sea customs act, 1878. 9. it is necessary at this stage to refer to the scheme of the relevant provisions of the act which was passed in 1878 to consolidate and amend the law relating to levy of sea customs duties. this may be done conveniently in three parts : (a) the charging section ..... v : the duties prescribed the central law referred to in section 20 are ar rates specified according to a fixed tariff or according to the value of the goods. section 29, thereforee, requires that on importation of any goods into any customs port, the owner of such goods shall, in the bill of entry, state, to the best of his knowledge and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 1979 (HC)

P.V. Mohammad Baramy Sons Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi686

..... modify its export policy as announced on june 5, 1978 but without any success. in the meanwhile the central government issued the exports (control) twenty-seventh amendment order, 1978, amending part a, schedule i of the exports (control) order, 1977 by substituting the words 'teak wood (tectone grandis)' in place of the words 'teakwood ..... applyingthe above decisions to the matters before us we have no hesitation in holding that the impugned ban brought in by the exports (control) twenty-seventh amendment order, 1978, disallowing export of teak even in sawn sizes must be held to be invalid and unconstitutional. we are assuming the validity of section 3 ..... to be goods of which the import or export has been prohibited under section 11 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), all the provisions of that act shall have effect accordingly. (3)notwithstanding anything contained in the aforesaid act, the central government may, by order published in the official gazette, prohibit restrict or impose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Director Directorate of Education & Anr vs.mohd. Shamim & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... ram 2003 scc online del 570 and vinod kumar chowdhry vs. narain devi taneja (1980) 2 scc120that the existing provisions of the act unless excluded from application to the amended provisions, extend to the amended provisions as well. section 25a merely gives the provisions of section 25b and 25c an overriding effect rc.rev. 279/2014 page 21 ..... for the respondents also refers to madhu gupta vs. gardenia estates (p) ltd. 2011 (184) dlt103holding that the procedure prescribed in section 25b does not permit amendment of application for leave to defend and states that though special leave petition was preferred thereagainst but the same was withdrawn. it is 39. it cannot be forgotten ..... revisional power and which is different from the appellate power; that section 25b is a self-contained provision; (xxv) reliance is placed on commissioner of customs and central excise vs. hongo india private ltd. 2009 (5) scc791holding that in the absence of any provision in section 35 (h) of the central excise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2019 (HC)

Irb Tumkur Chitradurga Tollway Limited (Earlier Known as Irb Tumkur Ch ...

Court : Delhi

..... 2011, vide letter dated january 30, 2012 informed petitioner that financial consultant and credible management & consultant (pvt.) ltd. has examined the term loan agreement and amendment to the financing agreement and has furnished their comments in terms of annexure a and annexure b annexed with the said letter. it was categorically stated that draft ..... mr. justice v. kameswar rao judgment v. kameswar rao, j1 the present petition has been filed by the petitioner under section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 ( act of 1996 , in short) with the following prayers: it is therefore humbly prayed that this hon'ble court may be pleased to: a. stay the ..... 06, 2000 seeking reference to the disputes to the arbitration. as the respondent failed to comply, the appellant filed an application under section 11 of the act. according to the appellant, clause 67.3 of the general conditions of the contract forming part of the contract between the public works department and the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2019 (HC)

Khandwala Enterprise Private Limited vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... goods of the description as specified in column (3) of the table appended hereto and falling under the chapter, heading, sub-heading or tariff item of the first schedule to the customs tariff act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said table, when imported into india from the ..... dated 31st december, 2016. the relevant portion of notification 152/2009-cus, dated 31st december, 2009, as so amended, reads thus: in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the central government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to ..... itc (hs), 2017 scheduled-1 (import policy) in exercise of powers conferred by section 5 of s.o. (e): the foreign trade (development & regulation) act, 1992 (as amended from time to time) read with paragraph 2.01 of the foreign trade policy, 2015-2020, the central government hereby notifies indian trade classification (harmonised system) of import .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //