Skip to content


Current - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: current Year: 1916 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.057 seconds)
May 01 1916 (FN)

Lamar Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-01-1916

lamar v united states 241 u s 103 1916 u s supreme court lamar v united states 241 u s...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1916 (FN)

Minerals Separation, Ltd. Vs. Hyde

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-11-1916

minerals separation ltd v hyde 242 u s 261 1916 u s supreme court minerals separation ltd v hyde 242...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1916 (PC)

Arasayee Ammal Vs. Sokkalinga Mudali

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-02-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.84

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1916 (PC)

Narayanaswamy Naidu Minor by His Mother and Next Friend Sayamma Vs. Ma ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-20-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.83

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1916 (PC)

Sultan Ahmad Ali Rajah Avergal of Cannanore Vs. Arakkal Adi Rajah Cher ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.106

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1916 (PC)

Lingam Krishna Bhupatt Devu Garu Vs. Jogani Venkataswamy

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-04-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.235

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 24 1916 (PC)

Ravur Munisami Naidu and ors. Vs. Pandala Muthial Naidu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-24-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.79

..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise ..... two explanations under clause iv of rule 14 b and make him ineligible for the current selection or for all future selection depending on whether the acquittal is honourable or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 01 1916 (FN)

United States Vs. Archer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-01-1916

..... agricultural purposes by the extension of the dike the high water current of the river has been deflected over and across a large ..... but was covered in part or in whole by slacker water the current during high water seasons being as aforesaid struck against and impinged ..... stated in addition to the danger which threatened the levee said current impinging upon the banks of the stream and the neck of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1916 (PC)

A.K.A. Khan Ghuznavi Vs. National Bank of India, Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-04-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.34

..... then due to you from messrs a h ghuznavi co on current account or otherwise howsoever including all interest charges and other expenses ..... the moneys overdrawn by messrs a h ghuznavi co upon their current account with you i the undersigned abdul karim aim ahmed khan ..... then due to you from messrs a h ghuznavi co on current account or otherwise howsoever including all interest charges and other expenses .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1916 (PC)

Bhuvaragha Iyengar Vs. Natesa Iyer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-03-1916

Reported in: AIR1918Mad1302; 37Ind.Cas.768

..... if borrowing for charges which should be met out of the current income is treated as legal necessity it will enable the limited ..... slight that the kist in question could not be paid from the current income the estate in question was fairly large and now produces ..... the same footing as kist as they should be paid from the current income and similar considerations apply prima facie the conversion of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //