Court : Delhi
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 12/2018 Decided on:17. h September, 2018 RAKESH STATE Through: Mr. Naomi Chandra, Advocate ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP ..... Respondent + CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant faced prosecution in Sessions case no.arising out of first information report (FIR) no.of police station Gandhi Nagar, involving offences punishable under Sections 376, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short, POCSO Act). By order on sentence dated 18.09.2017, after conviction by judgment dated 13.09.2017, punishment was awarded in the form of rigorous imprisonment for 10 years with fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence under Section 376(2) IPC, rigorous imprisonment for one year for offence under Section 506 Part-II IPC, no separate sentence having been awarded under Section 6 of POCSO Act. By the said order, directions were als...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:18.04.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:12.09.2018 LPA1602018 & CM APPL. Nos. 11741-44/2018 CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Krishnan Venugopal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rahul Goel and Ms. Anu Monga, Mr. Neeraj Lalwani, Mr. Rishabh Arora and Mr. Nitish Sharma Advocates. versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Ms. Shreya Singh, ...Respondents Shishodia Mr.Manan Ms.Aakansha Kaul, Advocates for R-1/CCI. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The present appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 09.03.2018 of a learned Single Judge of this court. The LPA No.160/2018 Page 1 of 63 impugned judgment upheld the orders dated 16.01.2018 and 17.01.2018 passed by the first Respondent i.e. Competition Commission of India (hereinafter CCI). The CCIs orders were passed on the two review/recall applications an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h September, 2018. RSA1752017 & CM No.24021/2017 (for stay) RANBIR SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.K. Jain, Adv. Versus SAJANTI RAM CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. C.M. Sharma, Adv. ..... Respondent This Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil 1. Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment [dated 18th February, 2017 in RCA No.196/2016 (Unique ID No.02402C0034422016) of the Court of Additional District Judge, Shahdara]. allowing the First Appeal filed by the respondent / plaintiff against the judgment and decree [dated 25th April, 2016 in Civil Suit No.275/2010 (Unique ID No.02403C0221442010) of the Court of Additional Civil Judge, Shahdara]. of dismissal of suit filed by the respondent / plaintiff against the appellant / defendant for recovery of Rs.1,25,000/- along with interest and costs. Resultantly, vide the impugned judgment, a decree has been passed in favour of the resp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 3044/2016 & CM Nos. 12845/2016, 18410/2016 & 26211/2017 WALMART INDIA PVT. LTD. versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CENTRAL VIGILANCE COMMISSION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent :Mr Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr Anuj Berry, Mr Mahak Bhatt, Mr Nikhil Pillai, Mr Adit Punj, Mr Raghav and Ms Reva Mann, Advocates. :Ms Tatini Basu, Advocate for CVC. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 Walmart India Private Limited (hereafter WIPL) has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the inquiry being conducted by the Central Vigilance Commission (hereafter CVC) in terms of summons dated 29.10.2015 and letters dated 16.11.2015 and 29.03.2016 be set aside. The CVC had initiated an inquiry on the basis of a news report published in The Wall Street Journal on 19.10.2015 and in other newspapers, where...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + NEERAJ SINGAL W.P.(CRL) 2453/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Ms. Ranjana Gawai, Mr. Arshdeep Singh, Mr. Hemant Shah, Mr. Aditya Pujari, Ms. Anusha Nagarajan, Ms. Vasudha Sen, Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Mr. Sumit Bindal, Ms. Shivika Singh, and Mr. Akshat Gupta, Advocates. Roy versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, ASG ........ RESPONDENTS and Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Narula, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, Mr. Narindra Mann, Mr. Kavinder Gill, Mr. Arunendra Singh, Mr. Abhishek Ghai, Mr. Rajat Gava, Mr. Shravan Kumar Shukla, Ms. Mallika Hiramath, Mr. Harshul Choudhary, Mr. Sood, Mr. Viplav Acharya with Ms. Mann Kapila, Sr. Asst. Director, Mr. P.C. Maurya, Addl. Director, Mr. S.S. Sahnai, Addl. Director & Mr. Ajeet Srivastava, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 Mr. Satish Aggarwala & Mr. Vinee...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. h August, 2018 CRL.M.C. 2653/2011 and Crl. M.A. 19114/2014 and 15474/2017 NARESH NAGPAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, proxy counsel versus SAMIR JASUJA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Mohit Daulatani, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (no.3132/1/2007) instituted by the respondent, after a preliminary inquiry, the Metropolitan Magistrate by order dated 27.02.2008 summoned the petitioner as accused for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The present petition invoking the inherent power of this court under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.PC) was filed seeking quashing of the said order and the proceedings arising out of the criminal complaint, it having been presented in August 2011 on the plea that the knowledge about the issuance of the process was gained only after non-bailable warra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h May 2018 Decided on:24. h August 2018 + CRL.A. 129/2012 + KULWINDER ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil and Ms. Pooja Swami, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. CRL.A. 139/2012 KAMALA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anubha Rastogi and Mr. Shreeji versus Bhavsar, Advocate. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. Ms. Sumita Kapil, Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Jitender Sharma, Mr. S. Rajan, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Hanumant Sakhuja, Advocates. Mr. Jitendra Sethi and Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocates for Accused Nos. 25, 39, 67, 68, 75. Crl.A. 129/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 209 + CRL.A. 190/2012 KARAMPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h May 2018 Decided on:24. h August 2018 + CRL.A. 129/2012 + KULWINDER ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil and Ms. Pooja Swami, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. CRL.A. 139/2012 KAMALA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anubha Rastogi and Mr. Shreeji versus Bhavsar, Advocate. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. Ms. Sumita Kapil, Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Jitender Sharma, Mr. S. Rajan, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Hanumant Sakhuja, Advocates. Mr. Jitendra Sethi and Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocates for Accused Nos. 25, 39, 67, 68, 75. Crl.A. 129/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 209 + CRL.A. 190/2012 KARAMPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h May 2018 Decided on:24. h August 2018 + CRL.A. 129/2012 + KULWINDER ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil and Ms. Pooja Swami, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. CRL.A. 139/2012 KAMALA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anubha Rastogi and Mr. Shreeji versus Bhavsar, Advocate. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. Ms. Sumita Kapil, Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Jitender Sharma, Mr. S. Rajan, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Hanumant Sakhuja, Advocates. Mr. Jitendra Sethi and Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocates for Accused Nos. 25, 39, 67, 68, 75. Crl.A. 129/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 209 + CRL.A. 190/2012 KARAMPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. h May 2018 Decided on:24. h August 2018 + CRL.A. 129/2012 + KULWINDER ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sumita Kapil and Ms. Pooja Swami, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. CRL.A. 139/2012 KAMALA & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anubha Rastogi and Mr. Shreeji versus Bhavsar, Advocate. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, SPP with Mr. Ashish Negi, Ms. Sushila and Ms. Shikha Mehra, Advocates. Ms. Sumita Kapil, Mr. M.L. Yadav, Mr. Mukesh Kalia, Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Mr. Ajay Verma, Mr. Jitender Sharma, Mr. S. Rajan, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Mr. R.P. Luthra and Mr. Hanumant Sakhuja, Advocates. Mr. Jitendra Sethi and Mr. Hemant Gulati, Advocates for Accused Nos. 25, 39, 67, 68, 75. Crl.A. 129/2012 & connected matters Page 1 of 209 + CRL.A. 190/2012 KARAMPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M...
Tag this Judgment!