Court : Delhi
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4489/2018 Judgment delivered on:10.10.2018 SACHIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ...... RESPONDENTS Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State. Insp. Raj Kumar Saha, SHO New Usman Pur with ASI Suresh Kumar, PS New Usman Pur. JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. On oral prayer of the petitioners, Mr. Sudhir Kumar, husband of respondent No.2 is impleaded as respondent No.3. Amended memo of parties has been filed along with affidavit. The same is taken on record.2. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.379/2013 under Sections 451/354/324/325/5IPC and Section 3 SC/ST Act, CRL.M.C. 4489/2018 Page 1 of 3 Police Station New Usmanpur.3. Parties are related to each other. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the daughter-in-law and son of the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~11 & 12 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3941/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 13976-13977/2015, 2473/2018 SHOBHANA BHARTIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 3947/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 17806-17807/2015, 2472/2018 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.39412015 Etc. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 12 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) On the criminal complaint (DLC/NDD/IO/2015/2398) dated 14.08.2015 of the second respondent (the complainant), the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~11 & 12 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 3941/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 13976-13977/2015, 2473/2018 SHOBHANA BHARTIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State + CRL.M.C. 3947/2015 & CRL.M.A. Nos. 17806-17807/2015, 2472/2018 HINDUSTAN MEDIA VENTURES LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Kapur, Mr.Vivek Suri, Mr. Mayank Datta and Mr.Aashneet Singh, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. Crl. M.C. No.39412015 Etc. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 12 Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) On the criminal complaint (DLC/NDD/IO/2015/2398) dated 14.08.2015 of the second respondent (the complainant), the pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. h August, 2018 Date of decision :1st October, 2018 + CS (OS) 616/2017, I.A. 2232/2018 & 9146/2018 SH ANIL CHAUDHRY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma and Ms. Poonam Lau, Advocates. versus YAKULT DANONE INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Tanuj Bhushan, Ms. Nandita Chauhan & Ms. Advocates. (M:8800491497). Kruttika, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff- Shri Anil Chaudhary was appointed as a CFO and Company Secretary of the Defendant company on 16th January, 2007. He continued in the employment of the Defendant company until September, 2010. The Defendant company is a joint venture between Yakult Honsha Company Ltd., Japan and Danone Probiotics, Singapore, which in turn is a subsidiary of Group Danone, France.2. The brief background of the present suit is that imports of machinery were made by the Defendant in the year 2007-08. The Directorate of Reven...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. h September, 2018 FAO2702011 KISMAT SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Diwan and Mr. Lalit Kumar, versus Advocates PIARIYA DEVI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT1 The greatest challenge before the judiciary today is frivolous litigation. False claims are a huge strain on the judicial system. In Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC470 the Supreme Court observed that the Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted with frivolous litigation and a mechanism needs to be evolved to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession towards senseless and ill-considered claims. Relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereunder: 191. The Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted, with frivolous litigation. Ways and means need to be evolved, to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession, towards senseless and ill-con...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~22 to 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:27. h September, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4943/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33054/2018 ANIL SHERE Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD ... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4944/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33055/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD .... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4945/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33056/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. No.4943-4945/2018 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of proceedings relating to three different criminal complaint cases (CC635817, 63and 6357/17) which were brought before the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate by the respondent company each alleging offences punishable under ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~22 to 24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:27. h September, 2018 CRL.M.C. 4943/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33054/2018 ANIL SHERE Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD ... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4944/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33055/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD .... Respondent Through: None CRL.M.C. 4945/2018 and Crl. M.A. 33056/2018 ANIL SHERE ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dudeja, Advocate versus CHOYANG HEALTH CARE INDIA PVT LTD... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA Crl. M.C. No.4943-4945/2018 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) 1. These petitions arise out of proceedings relating to three different criminal complaint cases (CC635817, 63and 6357/17) which were brought before the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate by the respondent company each alleging offences punishable under ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:25. 09.2018 + W.P.(C) 7435/2015 ERICSSON INDIA PRIVATE LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.M. S. Syali, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mayank Nagi & Mr.Tarun Singh, Advocates. versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) The petitioners grievance is that the penalty imposed under 1. Section 271G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the Act) was illegal because the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) did not possess the requisite jurisdiction, when he issued first show-cause notice dated 30.04.2014 upon the default of the notice dated 18.02.2014, requiring the petitioner/assessee to produce the relevant documents under Section 92D(3) of the Act. The time given for this purpose was till 25.03.2014. It is therefore submitted that the default, W.P.(C) 7435/2015 Page 1 of 7 if an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h March, 2018 Decided on:24. h September, 2018 CRL.A. 666/2017 STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for the State. versus SATISH KUMAR ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. D.K. Mathur, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By the present appeal, State seeks setting aside of order dated 4th November, 2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the conviction for the offences punishable under Section 2(ia) (a) (b) (j) and (m) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (in short PFA Act) read with Rules 23, 28 and 29 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 (in short PFA Rules) punishable under Section 16(1A) of PFA Act was upheld. However, the sentence was reduced to the period till the rising of the Court and he was directed a fine of 35,000/- in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 15 days.2. Brief facts of the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h April, 2018 Decided on:17. h September, 2018 W.P. CRL. 2826/2016 ROSHAN LAL LALIT MOHAN & ANR ........ Petitioners Represented by: Mr.A.Maitri with STATE & ANR Ms.Radhika Chander, Advocates versus ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Avi Singh with Ms. Purnima, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr.A. Vijay Kumar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 The present writ petition is directed against the order dated 15th October, 2015 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (NI Act) in CC No.8667/2013, titled as National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Roshan Lal Lalit Mohan, whereby the said case was transferred to Bhubaneswar, Orissa in view of Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 since the complainant/ Respondent No.2 National Agricultural Co-operative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. had its account at Indian Overseas Bank, Bhubaneswar, Oris...
Tag this Judgment!