Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: criminal law amendment act 2005 section 7 amendment of the first schedule Court: chennai Page 1 of about 123 results (0.288 seconds)

Oct 01 2010 (HC)

C. Narendra Kumar, and ors. Vs. State Bank of India, and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... was filed for a relief of declaration to declare sub-sections 2 to 7 of section 17 of the sarfaesi act, as amended and substituted by section 10 (b) of enforcement of security interest and recovery of debt laws (amendment) act 2004 as ultra vires. this writ petition was filed after the dismissal of the earlier writ petition in wp ..... such an allegation has been made by the petitioner. therefore it was stated that the third respondent reserves his right to proceed against the petitioner in the appropriate criminal court for defamation.8. we have heard the counsel for both sides at length. by consent of the counsel for both sides, the writ petition itself is ..... bribe was specifically denied. the third respondent has also filed a separate affidavit contending that no such demand was ever made by him and he intend to take criminal action or defamatory proceedings against the petitioner.5. the first respondent further contended that originally, the petitioner filed w.p. no. 2449 of 2009, the first .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1950 (HC)

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

..... to be implied so as to avoid any room for controversy.12. i shall now examine, how & to what extent the provisions of the criminal law amendment act, unamended & amended, are inconsistent with the fundamental rights in part iii of the constitution. it is not seriously disputed by the learned advocate general though he did not ..... declaration by the govt. to be challenged in any manner. one could not find a better illustration of the exercise of naked arbitrary power than the original criminal law amendment act. the govt. had only to issue a notfn. on a subjective satisfaction that an association was unlawful & it was infallible & conclusive. it is ..... ; & (d) to promote, encourage & popularise are, literature & drama.'the notfn. by the resp. the state of madras, dated 10-3-1950 under section 16, criminal law amendment act, 1908, declaring the society an unlawful assocn. is in the following terms :'whereas in the opinion of the state govt. the assocn. known as the people's education society .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1912 (PC)

Muthukumarsawmi Pillai and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 14Ind.Cas.896

..... clause 26 of the letters patent, there can, in my opinion, be no doubt that it is unsustainable. the conviction of the accused was under the criminal law amendment act, xiv of 1908. that statute entitles the governor-general in council or the local government to direct that the special procedure prescribed therein should apply to the ..... crown, has taken the preliminary objection that article 26 of the letters patent has no application to a case tried in accordance with the provisions of the indian criminal law amendment act and we have, therefore, no jurisdiction to review the case. that article must be considered in connection with articles 22, 23, 24, and 25. article ..... for the purpose of seeing whether or not the remaining evidence justified the decision of the jury. in the present case under section 11(3) of the criminal law amendment act, 1908, the decision is that of the majority of the court, and the reasons for that decision have been given in a most careful and elaborate judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 15 1912 (PC)

The King-emperor Vs. Nilakanta Alias Brahmachari and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)22MLJ490

..... under clause 26 of the letters patent, there can, in my opinion be no doubt that it is unsustainable. the conviction of the accused was under the criminal law amendment act, xiv of 1908. that statute entitles the governor-general in council or the local government to direct the at the special procedure prescribed therein should apply to ..... crown has taken the preliminary objection that article 26 of the letters patent has no application to a case tried in accordance with the provisions of the indian criminal law amendment act and we have therefore no jurisdiction to review the case. that article must be considered in connection with articles 22, 23, 24 and 25. article 22 ..... for the purpose of seeing whether or not the remaining evidence justified the decision of the jury. in the present case under section 11(3) of the criminal law amendment act, 1908, the decision is that of the majority of the court, and the reasons for that decision have been given in a most careful and elaborate judgment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 1912 (PC)

Muthukumaraswami Pillai and Seven ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1912)ILR35Mad397

..... clause 26 of the letters patent, there can, in my opinion, be no doubt that it is unsustainable. the conviction of the accused was under the criminal law amendment act, xiv of 1908. that statute entitles the governor-general in council or the local government to direct that the special procedure prescribed therein should apply to the ..... crown has taken she preliminary objection that article 26 of the letters patent has no application to a case tried in accordance with the provisions of the indian criminal law amendment act and we have therefore no jurisdiction to review the case that article must be considered in connection with articles 22, 23, 24 and 25. article 22 ..... for the purpose of seeing whether or not the remaining evidence justified the decision of the jury. in the present case under section 11 (3) of the criminal law amendment act, 1908, the decision is that of the majority of the court, and the reasons for that decision have been given in a most careful and elaborate judgment. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 12 1949 (PC)

In Re: Bisabathuni Ramalingayya

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1950Mad391

..... such unlawful assemblies and meetings. kindred offences under sections 144, 145, 146 and 148, penal code are bailable under the code of criminal procedure. by analogy, the offence under section 17 (1), criminal law amendment act, similar to those offences, can be argued to be bailable. merely to prevent this, the above clause has been introduced. if the intention of the legislature was to prevent ..... panchapakesa ayyar, j.1. the learned public prosecutor is afraid that the language used in section17 (3), criminal law amendment act of 1908 will make it impossible for this court to grant bail to persons like the petitioner, accused of an offence under section 17 (1). his fears are groundless. section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1965 (HC)

P.S. Sadagopachari and anr. Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1966Mad432; 1966CriLJ1452

..... not the power of a court of session. but this does not affect the question of jurisdiction of the special judge under s. 8(1) of the criminal law amendment act to take cognisance of offences either on police charge sheet or private complaint or otherwise. the learned advocate for the petitioners referred to s. 193 crl. p ..... of cl. (3) of s. 8 of the criminal law amendment act which extends only such of the provisions of the criminal procedure code, not covered by the previous clauses 1 and 2 of sec. 8 of the criminal law amendment act. the said first part of clause (3) of s. 8 of the criminal law amendment act is governed by the latter part of the said clause ..... take cognisance of all the offences charged against the petitioners and others as private complaint of the collector of customs. under s 8(1) of the criminal law amendment act a special judge may take cognisance of offences without the accused being committed to him for trial, and in trying the accused persons he shall follow the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1953 (HC)

In Re: A. Vaidyanatha Iyer

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1954Mad350; (1954)IMLJ15

..... the criminal law amendment act, 1952, act 46 of 1952 came into force on 28-7-1952, certain proceedings were pending against the petitioner herein under section 161, i. p. c. before a special magistrate who had already framed charges against the petitioner and posted the case for further hearing to 12-8-1952. under section 10 of act 46 of ..... that along with the principal offender, the abettor, who offers a bribe is also made liable. section 4 of that act deals with an amendment of section 164, criminal p. c. it is unnecessary to refer to the amendments carried out by section 5. section 6 confers power on the state government to appoint special judges. sub-clauses (a) ..... -examined. against that order of the learned special judge, this criminal revision petition has been filed.2. in order to appreciate the question of law-raised, it would be advantageous to briefly trace the various provisions of act 46 of 1952. by section 3 of that act a new section is enacted and inserted in the indian penal .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 10 1977 (HC)

M. Karunanidhi Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1977Mad310; (1977)1MLJ182

..... compendiously as the central laws.4. the main points urged by counsel ..... this common judgment.3. the acts with which we are concerned are the i.p.c., the code of criminal procedure, 1973, the prevention of corruption act, 1947, the criminal law (amendment) act, 1952, and the tamil nadu public men (criminal misconduct) act, 1973. we shall refer to these enactments hereafter as the penal code, the procedure code, the corruption act, the criminal law (amendment) act, and the state act and to the first four .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 1951 (HC)

In Re: V. Vengan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1952Mad95; (1951)2MLJ241

..... with the ideals, the letter and the spirit of the constitution. the convictions of the peti. tioners are confirmed under section 1 (1) (b), criminal law amendment act and the sentences reduced to the period they had undergone until i released them from jail.13. on the day i delivered this judgment another baton ..... thia north indian shop. mr. bamchandran and mr. venkataraman who appeared for the petitioners and made contributions to the arguments contended further that section 7, criminal law amendment act, 1932 has been rendered ultra vires as being in breach of this fundamental right under article 19(1)(a). arguments could not be finished on the ..... days were entirely different. there was then a deliberate disobedience of some existing laws and a courting of imprisonment. the analogy does not also stand constitutional scrutiny. picketting of toddy shops, illegal though it was under section 7, criminal law amendment act, was in pursuance of the policy of prohibition and all liquor shops have .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //