Creaturely - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: creaturely Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 290 results (0.006 seconds)T.S. Sarma Vs. Director, Ministry of Mines and
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Jun-10-2004
Reported in: (2005)(2)SLJ245CAT
1 the applicant filed o a no 980 2003 seeking for setting aside the inquiry proceedings conducted by the inquiry...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDempo Engineering Works Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: (2004)(97)ECC103
a appellant had filed classification declaration no 125 95 96 claiming classification under 89 05 for a product pontoon with...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBpl Limited Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-30-2004
Reported in: (2008)11VST835(Karn)
..... of the amount as determined by the authority held right to file is only a creature of statute and no one can claim it a vested right or an independent right .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Karnataka Vs. Thimmappa and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-06-2004
Reported in: 2004CriLJ1968
..... between democratic education and monolithic system of cultural totalitarianism a child is not a mere creature of the state the parents have the right to decide as to whether their children .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Dheer Singh Bhatti
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-24-2004
Reported in: IV(2004)CPJ33(SC); JT2004(8)SC17; 2004(8)SCALE187; (2005)9SCC555
..... the legislature is ultra vires the legislature in that situation does not become a helpless creature as it continues to remain a living pillar of a living constitution though it cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shantamma Vs. Bangalore Mahanagar Palike and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-06-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)KarLJ63
..... possession and enjoyment of immovable properties suffice it to state that the bbmp is a creature of a statute and cannot perpetuate a wrong by not making available a form for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers' Association
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-10-2004
Reported in: AIR2004SC3905; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)839; 2004(2)CTC430; [2004(101)FLR219]; JT2004(3)SC474; 2004(2)KLT1(SC); (2004)IILLJ327SC; (2004)4MLJ6(SC); 2004(3)SCALE116; (2004)10SCC460; 2
..... the workmen employed by them ii the tribunal being a creature of the reference cannot adjudicate matters not within the purview ..... company it is therefore dear that the tribunal being a creature of the reference cannot adjudicate matters not within the purview ..... workmen employed by them and that the tribunal being the creature of the reference cannot adjudicate matters not within the purview .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.B. Jodhamal Vs. State and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-06-2004
Reported in: AIR2005J& K81,2005(1)ARBLR534(J& K),2004(3)JKJ311
..... 23 it is settled law that the arbitrator is the creature of the contract between the parties and hence if he ..... express condition of the supplementary agreement the learned arbitrator being creature of the agreement was bound by the provisions contained in ..... be without jurisdiction for the reasons that an arbitrator being the creature of the agreement draw his jurisdiction from the agreement itself .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNovartis Ag and anr. Vs. Mehar Pharma and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-23-2004
Reported in: 2005(3)BomCR191; 2005(30)PTC160(Bom)
..... one country has a persuasive value in another patent and design rights are statutory creatures territorial in nature and dependent only on specific registration in each country registration of ..... however been enacted in utter disregard of the constitutional restrictions giving rise to a draconian creature untrammelled by any constitutional restraints as would be evident from the following a unlike .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMagna Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-05-2004
Reported in: RLW2004(4)Raj2097; 2004(4)WLC347
..... it under section 38 of the act of 1994 the review being creature of the statute in absence of any provision for review the authority ..... orders under section 38 of the act of 1994 the review being creature of the statute in absence of any express provision for review the ..... the power to review does inhere in any authority and is a creature of statute apart from the judgments cited on the side of learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial