Coverage - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: coverage Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 1,118 results (0.178 seconds)Kasat Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-04-2006
Reported in: (2006)(105)ECC409
1 heard both sides in these appeals the appellants are an assessee under the central excise act and their directors...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSamson Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-2006
samson v california 04 9728 2006 october term 2005 samson v california supreme court of the united states samson v...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmbuja Cement Eastern Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Air
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-25-2006
Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC727
1 the appellants being aggrieved by an order of commissioner of customs appeals airport mumbai filed the present appeal m...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Abraham J. Tharakan, Vs. the Commissioner of Central
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Oct-11-2006
Reported in: (2007)(115)ECC132
1 these appeals have been filed against order in original no 38 2005 dated 7 10 2005 passed by the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. M.R.F. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-13-2006
Reported in: (2006)(109)ECC167
1 all these appeals are by the revenue appeals e 3170 to 3177 98 are against an order passed by...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVikraman @ Diksoo Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-23-2006
Reported in: 2008(1)KLJ169
v ramkumar j 1 the 2nd accused in s c no 1969 2002 on the file of the court of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGoyal Mg Gases Ltd. Vs. Premium International Finance Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-2006
Reported in: II(2007)BC147; 138(2007)DLT259; 2009(93)DRJ831
gita mittal j 1 this application has been filed under the provisions of order 37 rule 4 read with rule...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTXcell Automation Vs. Government of Punjab and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-22-2006
Reported in: (2007)146PLR685; (2007)5VST308(P& H)
1 this petition seeks quashing of order dated february 28 2005 annexure p 6 passed by respondent no 2 excise...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWest Asia Maritime Ltd. Vs. the Income-tax Officer,
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai
Decided on: May-19-2006
Reported in: (2008)111ITD155(Chennai)
1 these two appeals by the assessee are directed against the order of the cit appeals and relate to the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Arun Kumar Vs. Sri Ramdass Motor Transport Limited and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-19-2006
Reported in: 2008ACJ227; 2007(1)ALD319; 2007(3)ALT282
..... is evident from the fact that section 147 itself provides for coverage of liability 16 the underlined portion of the section clearly ..... clear that there does not exist a total prohibition as to coverage of liability towards persons travelling in goods vehicles the insurer ..... non fare paying passengers under it in the converse case the coverage to non fare paying passengers is wider one which can .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial