Skip to content


County Court - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: county court Page 1 of about 7 results (0.013 seconds)
Apr 20 1891 (FN)

Scotland County Court Vs. United States Ex Rel. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

Hill - 140 U.S. 41 (1891) U.S. Supreme Court Scotland County Court v. United States ex Rel. Hill, 140 U.S. 41 any restriction on the amount to be raised, the county court was expressly authorized to do all that was necessary to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1881

Ralls County Court Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

to protect the interest and credit of the county. Such county court may appoint an agent to represent the county, vote to consider whether the command of the writ that the court cause the tax to be collected is in excess of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 1886 (FN)

Cape Girardeau County Court Vs. Hill

Court: US Supreme Court

in accordance with the valuation then last made by the county assessor for county purposes, provided however that no county, city, April 19, 1886 118 U.S. 68 ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 12 1883 (FN)

Knox County Court Vs. United States Ex Rel. Harshman

Court: US Supreme Court

the kind involved in these suits are debts of the county. Holders are entitled to payment out of the general funds . MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court. In United States v. County of Clark, 96 U. S.

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 1908 (FN)

Braxton County Court Vs. West Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

1905 was insufficient to meet the ordinary expenses of the county, pay the interest, and provide a sinking fund for outstanding caused it to be entered upon the records of the court. Such levy of sixty-five cents would produce the sum of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1979 (FN)

County Court of Ulster County Vs. Allen

Court: US Supreme Court

v. Allen - 442 U.S. 140 (1979) U.S. Supreme Court County Court of Ulster County v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140 (1979) analysis of Tot v. United States was used by the Court in United States v. Gainey, 380 U. S. 63 (1965),

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 31 1887 (FN)

Meriwether Vs. Muhlenburg County Court

Court: US Supreme Court

county court, it means a court presided over by the county judge alone, and should be held to so mean when 26. The county court is also described as "the county court of levy and disbursements" when reference is made to its

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //