Counsel - Judgment Search Results

Lawyer Vs. Department of Justice

Court: US Supreme Court

on the present record that proponents of the plan included counsel authorized to represent the State itself, and there is no

Advocate Cuddalore; Collector of South Arcot Vs. an Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1958CriLJ1321

his client. That duty continues even after the relationship of advocate and client has ceased, and therefore this prohibition cannot be

Advocate-general of Madras Vs. Sri Amanullakhan, Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ219

in cold blood, what precisely were the words uttered by Counsel, this would be a matter of considerable difficulty. That is

Advocate General of Madras Vs. Amanullakhan, Advocate, Salem 1

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad162; 1967CriLJ551

Penal Code.(4-A) The other part of the argument of learned counsel is that the facts have to be strictly proved, and

Ashok Pandey, Advocate Vs. Satish Chandra Mishra (Presently, Advocate ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2003)2UPLBEC1294

created by the Constitution like Deputy Chief Minister or Additional Advocate General and to declare that 'a' (single constitutional offices) can

M.S. Rahi, Advocate Vs. Bhoop Singh, Advocate

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2005)140PLR122

who is residing with landlord.5. Before this Court, the learned counsel for the petitioner has vehemently argued that the landlord has

J.R. Parashar, Advocate and ors. Vs. Prasant Bhushan, Advocate and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2001SC3395; 2001(49)BLJR2222; 2001CriLJ4207; 2001(4)Crimes217(SC); JT2001(7)SC189; 2001(5)SCALE524; (2001)6SCC735; 2002(1)LC62(SC)

an FIR based on the complaint of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 contended that the petition was

State of A.P. Rep. by the Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Vs. S. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(2)ALT461

the 7th respondent through Sri S. Ramachandra Rao, learned Senior Counsel. Counter-affidavit has been filed by the 4th respondent and written

Re:mohit Chaudhary, Advocate Vs. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate

Court: Supreme Court of India

giving no time to a party situated at Mumbai and counsel at Delhi to prepare. An enquiry be made and practice

“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That the Petitioner Was Not Pr ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

following order was passed by this Court on 26.2.2013:- Learned counsel, inter-alia, contended that the petitioner was not present at the