Skip to content


Cotton Textiles Cess Act 1948 Repealed Section 9 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: cotton textiles cess act 1948 repealed section 9 Page 1 of about 402 results (3.194 seconds)
Nov 26 1973 (SC)

Shree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1974SC366; (1974)1SCC468; [1974]2SCR398

..... act 1940 in section 62 read with trade marks rules 96 and 97 treats cotton yarn as textile goods the cotton textiles cess act 1948 provided for levy of cess ..... cotton textile control order 1948 was issued in the month of august 1948 repealing the earlier order in the new cotton textile control order of 1948 ..... rs 17 18 the government procurement price was rs 9 per maund the court held that it was an .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 24 2006 (SC)

Hotel and Restaurant Assocn. and anr. Vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1168; (2007)1CompLJ46(SC); 2006(12)SCALE543; 2007[5]STR161

meenakshi mills ltd v union of india 1974 2scr398 the cotton textiles cess act 1948 and the cotton textiles companies management in that view of the matter even sirsilk ltd v textiles committee and ors air1989sc317 would have no application in the ltd v union of india 1974 2scr398 the cotton textiles cess act 1948 and the cotton textiles companies management of undertakings exercise of its power under section 11 2 of trai act the same having not been done till date in our union of india 1974 2scr398 the cotton textiles cess act 1948 and the cotton textiles companies management of undertakings and liquidation provides for the functions of trai clause a of sub section 1 of section 11 of trai act empowers trai to the trai act the central government issued a notification on 9 01 2004 notifying broadcasting and cable services to be telecommunication

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1994 (TRI)

Shri Dinesh Mills Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2003)(161)ELT894TriDel

newsprint industry the manufacturer catalogue collected from m s greaves cotton amp co ltd also described the imported machine as paper textiles they have also produced their product literature of geo textiles which states that the appellant company has successfully undertaken filed 3 4 and 5 of section xvi of customs tariff act 1975 which indicated that composite plant with two or more also relied on section notes 3 4 and 5 of section xvi pertaining to machinery and mechanical appliances of customs tariff was relied another letter of the importer dated 31 1 90 addressed to the ministry of textiles was also relied in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1959 (HC)

Khimji Poojnja and Co. Vs. N. Ramanlal and Co. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1960)62BOMLR277

effected according to the rules and regulations of the ahmedabvad cotton merchants association if that be so it cannot be said cotton or kapas and cotton seed after the words woollen textiles in paragraph a of sub section 1 of s 2 has to be mentioned that under the government of india act 1935 it was the provincial government only which had power have been issued by the provincial government on 1 4 1948 by notification no 4132 33 d 1 it was directed constitution is to continue in force therein until altered or repealed or amended by a competent legislature or other competent authority india cotton association in pursuance of the provisions of sub section 5 of s 3 and also sanctioned the bye laws suits and in fact decreed in suits nos 75 and 93 of 1953 26 the result is that we must hold

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1956 (HC)

Amir Chand Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1956All562; 1956CriLJ1141

person other than a dealer shall sell toany person controlled cotton cloth except under and in accordance with the conditionsof a conditions under which permits can be obtained under the cotton textiles control of movement order 1948 it was argued in that convicted under section 7 of the essential supplies temporary powers act 1946 no xxiv of 1946 for contravention of clause 6 of clause 6 a of the cotton textiles control order 1948 and clause 4 of the u p controlled cotton cloth yarn dealers licensing order 1948 the penalties provided in those sections in violation of the constitutional right cannot be imposed 3 of cotton yarn not exceeding 10 ib in weight clause 9 of the u p controlled cotton cloth and yarn dealers

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 1979 (HC)

The Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Wvg.) Co. Ltd., Birlagram, UjjaI ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1980MP69; 1980MPLJ272

any other article made wholly or in part of i cotton or ii wool or iii silk or iv artificial silk finishing folding or packing of textiles section 2 g defines textiles this definition as originally enacted read as follows g textiles of 1973 by inserting section 5a made provision for a cess in the nature of duty of excise in substitution of to make rules for carrying out the purpose of the act in particular section 22 2 e empowers the central government contention in the return is that the fee payable under section 12 and rule 21 need not be correlated to every demand dated 11th july 1969 and for refund of rupees 9 66 994 12 recovered as fees from the petitioner under

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 2011 (TRI)

P. Gnanasekar and Another Vs. M/S. R. Kaveri

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

traders have been using the work ice cream to denote cotton cloth and mull poovan textiles who are whole sale dealers in ora 196 tm ch was partner of sri samy textiles before starting sri kannan mills sri samy textiles was using common to the trade in addition we have the criminal action initiated by the respondent they are against the sri kannan trade the registration is in contravention of section 11 sub section 6 8 and 9 of the trade marks act it it for four years had happened to register it first 9 we are in full agreement with this the appellants have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 1973 (HC)

South India Viscose Ltd. Vs. Textiles Committee and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [1973]91ITR595(Mad)

of cotton textiles and to ensure the efficiency of the cotton textile industry promulgated the cotton textiles fund ordinance 1944 establishing textile machinery it was with that object that the cotton textiles fund ordinance 1944 dated 8th july 1944 was originally promulgated other cases finance is provided by the levy of a cess as and by way of export duty and excise duty the cotton textiles fund ordinance 1944 in section 3 ofthe act a committee known as the textile committee a body corporatehaving inspection and examination under section 12 the above said act repealed the cotton textiles fund ordinance 1944 21 in exercise of meeting the pay and allowances of officials and staff under section 7 a the reasonableness of the fee charged under section standards have been fixed the committee s letter dated january 9 1967 clearly showing that no standards have been fixed for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 2000 (TRI)

C.C.E., New Delhi Vs. M/S. Plastikot (Sundersons)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in : (2001)(138)ELT700TriDel

proprietor m s chaukhani india p ltd sonepat manufactures coated cotton fabrics and coated man made fabrics falling under items no fabrics from time to time from the manufacturers of these textiles i e m s ambika textiles burhanpur which were received demanded from them under section 11a of the central excise act 1944 and why penalty should not be imposed on them should have been given the benefit of the provisions of section 4 4 d ii of the central excise act by central excise delhi passed order no 23 90 13 6 90 which is in appeal in the present proceedings the collector

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 07 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Mauli Textiles Through Its Proprietor and Another Vs. United Indi ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

it is stated by the opponent insurance company that the cotton cloths were thick and hence cannot receive fire it is complainants it is contended that the insured m s mauli textiles jalgoan is situated at plot no 29 30 of industrial the co operative society registered under the provisions of mcs act which is also engaged in the business of manufacturing of total value salvage value1 128rs 165541 rs 30 rs 52 96 898 rs 2 70 554 thus from the total value

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //