Corrigendum - Judgment Search Results

Bell Vs. Cone

Court: US Supreme Court

bell v cone 535 u s 685 2002 october term 2001 syllabus bell warden v cone certiorari to the united...

George Vs. State Bank of Travancore

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR2002Ker214; [2002]111CompCas385(Ker)

s sankarasubban j 1 fourth defendant in o s no 89 of the 1988 of the sub court ernakulam is...

Epoch Enterrepots Vs. M.V. Won Fu

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2003SC24; JT2002(8)SC546; (2003)1SCC305

banerjee j 1 leave granted 2 issuance of warrant for the arrest of the vessel m v won fu berthedat...

Shambhoo Sharan Pandey and anr. Etc. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2209

j c gupta j 1 criminal appeal no 2079 of 1986 is by shambhoo sharan pandey and his son kaushal...

Nallabothu Purnaiah Vs. Garre Mallikarjuna Rao (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD260

t ch surya rao j 1 the unsuccessful plaintiff has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree dated 9...

Rashid Vs. the State of Maharashtra .

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: II(2002)DMC601

1 the appellant original accused no 1 hereinafter referred to as the appellant and onemariyam begum shaikh safi original accused...

Union of IndiA. Vs. S.P. Goyal and State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002BomCR(Cri)699; 2002CriLJ4146

1 looking to the issue involved in this matter itwas decided by consent of the parties that at thisstage itself...

The State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Kalu Ram and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(9)SC416; 2003(10)SCALE849; (2004)12SCC543

..... on such bought out items duty initially demanded for one year period but by a corrigendum the period reduced to six months liability to duty disputed held in such circumstances even .....

Joginder Singh and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(9)SC429

..... on such bought out items duty initially demanded for one year period but by a corrigendum the period reduced to six months liability to duty disputed held in such circumstances even .....

K.M. Sharma Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 13(7), New Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC1715; (2002)174CTR(SC)210; [2002]254ITR772(SC); JT2002(4)SC10; 2002(3)SCALE383; (2002)4SCC339; [2002]2SCR1047; 2002TAXLR803; [2002]122TAXMAN426(SC)

..... rs 100 was thus an accidental slip which the tribunal was entitled to correct the corrigendum issued by the tribunal was therefore not a fresh award per pathak j contra once .....