Corresponding - Judgment Search Results

P. Chandra Sekhar Naidu and ors. Vs. Correspondent, Ssrso Upper Primar ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(1)ALD152; 2003(6)ALT693

g bikshapathy j 1 the batch of writ petitions and contempt cases can be disposed of by a common order...

Ajmeera Govind Vs. Principal and Correspondent, Arvinda Residential Sc ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005ACJ1436; 2004(4)ALD442; 2004(5)ALT383

order1 aggrieved by the award of the motor accident claims tribunal cum additional district judge nizamabad dated 20 11 1998...

A. Ruckmani Vs. the Correspondent, Gandhiji Aided Middle School,

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2003)2MLJ4

v s sirpurkar j 1 the appellant herein challenges the common order passed by the learned single judge of this...

S. Kasi Vs. the Secretary/Correspondent, A.V.M. Marimuthu Nadar Higher ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(4)CTC129

ordere padmanabhan j 1 the writ petitioner who was a teacher in the first respondent school has come forward with...

Ajmeera Govind Vs. Principal and Correspondent, Arvindo Residental Sch ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: I(2005)ACC69

orderb s a swamy j 1 aggrieved by the award of the motor accident claims tribunal cum additional district judge...

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... deposed that he is a telecommunication and electronic engineer sim cards imsi code which corresponds to telephone number are assigned by telephone companies and they are unique no call ..... mobile no 9810510816 9810510816 it thus stands established that the persons having the sim card corresponding to mobile no 9811489429 9811489429 was inter changing the mobile instrument with deceased terrorist .....

State. Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

..... farhan deposed that he is a telecommunication and electronic engineer sim cards imsi code which corresponds to telephone number are assigned by telephone companies and they are unique no call could ..... addressed by airtel to inspector mohan chand sharma providing certain details of mobile numbers their corresponding sim numbers etc the said letter is dated 17th december 2001 and in the captioned .....

Kishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)46SCL385SAT

..... said regulations and pending before it shall be deemed to have been preferred under the corresponding provisions of these regulations 128 it is an admitted fact that galan subsidiaries acquired 26 ..... said regulations and pending before it shall be deemed to have been preferred under the corresponding provisions of these regulations 192 scope of regulation 47 is unambiguous it saves any action .....

Peerless General Finance and Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2003)85ITD215(Kol.)

..... the relevant provisions of the income tax act 1922 and the corresponding provisions under the income tax act 1961 the relevant provisions ..... of the act under the 1922 act there was no restriction corresponding to restrictions placed under section 80 of the 1961 act ..... considered the provisions of the 1922 act vis a vis the corresponding provisions under the 1961 act the legislative history and the .....

Peerless General Finance and Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2003)79TTJ(Kol.)915

..... consider it necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of the it act 1922 and the corresponding provisions under the it act 1961 the relevant provisions considered by their lordships of the supreme ..... kerala high court have considered the provisions of the 1922 act vis a vis the corresponding provisions under the 1961 act the legislative history and the amendments effected to section 80 .....